By The Hill Staff - 10/16/13 08:39 PM EDT
IRFA, sponsored by Rep. Jason ChaffetzJason ChaffetzHouse GOP alleges political interference in EPA water rule Chaffetz says he'll vote for Trump Chaffetz: 'Years' of Clinton investigations to come MORE (R-Utah), would have made performance royalty fees paid by Internet radio services more in line with those paid by cable and satellite broadcasters.
“We [Internet radio] are the only ones who pay on a per-track basis versus a percentage of revenue for satellite or zero in broadcast,” Herring told CNET. Terrestrial radio broadcasters pay no performance royalty fees, though Rep. Mel Watt (D-N.C.) introduced a bill last month to change that.
“I'm not asking for the zero rate of broadcast,” Herring said. “I'm asking for everyone to pay a similarly calculated rate.”
Ted Kalo, executive director of musicians’ group musicFIRST, challenged Herring’s comments in a statement. “The more Pandora parrots the line 'it's not about lowering rates,’ the more obvious it becomes that is all this is about,” he said.
“Artists weren't fooled by double-talk about 'fairness' when it became clear that Pandora was seeking nothing more than a race to the bottom when it comes to paying music creators for performances.”
Because Pandora pushed for Chaffetz’s bill, Herring’s comments may be too late, Casey Rae, interim executive director of the Future of Music Coalition said.
“Herring's comments about not lowering artist payouts but instead harmonizing standards between platforms might have been better said a year ago. ... Now it's going to be much harder for Pandora to recapture goodwill in the artist community.”
Rae suggested that Pandora differentiate itself from other Internet radio services by engaging with artists.
“In order to make themselves indispensable, they'll need to have the artists and songwriters on their side,” he said.