Major hurdles await NSA reform bid

The fight to rein in the National Security Agency (NSA) is about to face its biggest test yet.
 
A reform bill heading to the Senate floor this week is meeting with opposition from both sides of the aisle and critics who threaten to dismantle the fragile coalition of lawmakers, tech companies and privacy advocates who have signed on to back the USA Freedom Act.
 
Supporters were not certain that they had the 60 votes necessary to overcome a procedural hurdle on Tuesday.
 
More than a year after Edward Snowden first revealed the powers of the spy agency, Congress is either about to give it a makeover or head back to the drawing board.
 
“None of us are sure, even though the attempt to bring it up occurs, whether or not it actually succeeds,” one tech industry advocate fighting in favor of the bill told The Hill.
 
“I would not consider it a done deal at this point.”
 
Sen. Patrick LeahyPatrick Joseph LeahyOvernight Regulation: Massachusetts AG sues Equifax | Trump weighs easing rules on gun exports | EPA nominee to fight worker safety rule in court Trump to ease rules on gun exports: report Overnight Defense: Senate passes 0B defense bill | 3,000 US troops heading to Afghanistan | Two more Navy officials fired over ship collisions MORE’s (D-Vt.) USA Freedom Act would end the NSA’s ability to collect records about Americans’ phone calls, including information about whom they call, how often and how long the conversations last. The metadata records do not include details about the substance of people’s conversations.
 
The bill would also add a team of privacy advocates to the federal court overseeing the nation’s spying programs and give tech companies additional ways to tell the public about the information they have to hand over to the government. Companies have said that revelations about the NSA have cost their businesses billions of dollars.
 
It has the support of a bipartisan group of lawmakers, ranging from Sen. Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzWhatever you think the Alabama special election means, you’re probably wrong This week: Congress gets ball rolling on tax reform Week ahead: Senators work toward deal to fix ObamaCare markets MORE (R-Texas) to Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), as well as major tech companies, the Obama administration and groups including the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Rifle Association.
 
Yet Sens. Dianne FeinsteinDianne Emiel FeinsteinGun proposal picks up GOP support Gingrich: Banning rapid fire gun modification is ‘common sense’ House bill set to reignite debate on warrantless surveillance MORE (D-Calif.) and Saxby ChamblissSaxby ChamblissLobbying World Former GOP senator: Let Dems engage on healthcare bill OPINION: Left-wing politics will be the demise of the Democratic Party MORE (R-Ga.) — the two leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee — have both expressed reservations, worrying that it would go too far.
 
Chambliss this week called it a “terrible” bill and told The Hill that he would work to filibuster it on Tuesday.
 
Feinstein has been less adamant in her opposition, but told reporters this week that she “still [has] problems” with the bill and hoped they could be worked out on the floor.
 
She and Leahy have long been working to reach an agreement and “will continue working together to make sure the Senate passes strong legislation to end the bulk collection of Americans’ phone records,” a Leahy aide said.
 
Feinstein and Chambliss are not alone.
 
Sen. John CornynJohn CornynGun proposal picks up GOP support House bill set to reignite debate on warrantless surveillance Republicans jockey for position on immigration MORE (R-Texas), the chamber’s second-ranking Republican, said that he feels “a little uncomfortable trying to jam though something that’s significant and important to our national security in a lame-duck session where you have people looking for the exit door who either have retired or been defeated.”
 
“This is something we shouldn’t be doing in a big rush under these circumstances in my view,” he said.
 
At the same time, some of the chamber’s strongest advocates of civil liberties say the bill is too weak. 
 
Sen. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulHouse bill set to reignite debate on warrantless surveillance Authorizing military force is necessary, but insufficient GOP feuds with outside group over analysis of tax framework MORE (R-Ky.) — a likely 2016 presidential candidate and frequent critic of government spying — “does not feel that the current NSA reforms go far enough,” an aide said.
 
The aide added that Paul would not vote for the bill unless it drops a provision extending the expiration of the Patriot Act from June to 2017, and said that he is also considering additional measures to strengthen the bill.

If the bill does manage to get the 60 votes to overcome a filibuster, lobbyists and advocates watching the process expect Feinstein or another likeminded lawmaker to introduce measures that would require private phone companies to keep certain customer records for a period of time beyond current Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requirements.
 
Feinstein is also likely to push for an amendment that blunts the influence of the privacy advocates on the secretive federal surveillance court and may try to attach portions of her cybersecurity bill, which has been lambasted by privacy advocates for giving too much information up to the government.

Multiple sources off of Capitol Hill expected Paul to introduce an amendment that would give more Americans the legal grounds to sue the NSA for its activities, a provision that could be troublesome for the administration.
 
Sen. Ron WydenRonald (Ron) Lee WydenHouse bill set to reignite debate on warrantless surveillance Senate confirms No. 2 spot at HHS, days after Price resigns Overnight Cybersecurity: Equifax CEO faces outraged lawmakers | Dem presses voting machine makers on cyber defense | Yahoo says 3 billion accounts affected by 2013 breach MORE (D-Ore.) is working on an amendment to add an additional measure ending “backdoor” searches of Americans through a legal authority meant to target foreigners, an aide said.
 
Sen. Mark UdallMark UdallDemocratic primary could upend bid for Colorado seat Picking 2018 candidates pits McConnell vs. GOP groups Gorsuch's critics, running out of arguments, falsely scream 'sexist' MORE (D-Colo.) has sided with Wyden on the backdoor searches and is going to “make every effort” to address the issue, his spokesperson said.
 
If the bill came up as-is, “it’s too early to say” whether or not Udall would vote for it, spokesman Mike Saccone told The Hill.
 
Any of those amendments could threaten the entire coalition.
 
Congress has to act at some point, however. The phone records program is among the Patriot Act provisions that expires in June and spy leaders say losing it entirely would be disastrous.
 
A fight over the issue next year would be a “whole different landscape” said Laura Murphy, head of the ACLU’s Washington office. Republican control of the Senate would set new terms for the debate and install new leaders of the Senate and Intelligence Committees who seem less inclined to deal.
 
A win, meanwhile, would put wind in reformers' sails, they say.
 
“Victory begets victory, and if we can pull that off, that sets the conditions for more and better reforms in the future,” said Kevin Bankston, policy director at the New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute.
 
“While if we fail, it makes it much harder for us to move on to the next critical issues that we would address.”