FEATURED:

Hoyer urges Boehner to let House 'work its will' on transportation

Earlier this month, the Senate passed a $109 billion proposal that would authorize spending for roads, bridges and other transportation infrastructure projects for the next two years. Sponsored by Sens. Barbara BoxerBarbara Levy BoxerKamala Harris endorses Gavin Newsom for California governor Dems face hard choice for State of the Union response Billionaire Steyer to push for Dem House push MORE (D-Calif.) and James InhofeJames (Jim) Mountain InhofeOvernight Defense: First Gitmo transfer under Trump could happen 'soon' | White House says Trump has confidence in VA chief | Russia concedes 'dozens' of civilians injured in Syria clash Pentagon budget euphoria could be short-lived House passes deal to end shutdown MORE (R-Okla.), the bill sailed through the upper chamber with a 74-22 vote. Twenty-two Republicans voted in favor of the bill.

Without congressional action, the gas tax for the highway trust fund will expire at the end of March.

Despite the bipartisan vote in the Senate, BoehnerJohn Andrew BoehnerRestoring fiscal sanity requires bipartisan courage GOP congressman slams primary rival for Ryan donations Speculation swirls about Kevin McCarthy’s future MORE and other GOP leaders have resisted the upper chamber's bill. After failing to rally support for their own five-year reauthorization bill, the Republicans are now trying to push through a short-term extension. Even that, however, is facing an uncertain future.

GOP leaders had scheduled a Monday evening vote on a three-month extension, but they yanked the bill when it emerged that Democrats were uniting against it in hopes of forcing a vote on the Senate bill instead. The GOP measure was on the suspension calendar, meaning it would have needed support from two-thirds of the House to pass — a hurdle requiring the backing of dozens of Democrats.

GOP leaders on Tuesday will try again to pass their short-term version. Hoyer, for one, is hoping they abandon that strategy in favor of the Boxer-Inhofe bill.

"You had very substantial bipartisan agreement in the United States Senate," Hoyer said. "I don't know why that shouldn't be reflected over here [in the House]."