By Keith Laing - 05/22/12 08:05 PM EDT
Reid said he was confident Boxer and counterpart in the House, Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman John Mica (R-Fla.), could finish the highway bill negotiations with either or House Speaker John BoehnerJohn BoehnerIn House GOP, Ryan endorsement of Trump seen as inevitable House GOP faces dilemma on spending bills Overnight Finance: Puerto Rico bill clears panel | IRS chief vows to finish term | Bill would require nominees to release tax returns MORE (R-Ohio), as is customary on hard-to-handle issues in bicameral negotiations.
"I think Boxer can handle it herself," Reid said, though he added "I'll be happy to meet with anybody to get it done."
Reid said the holds on a compromise emerging from the conference committee was not necessary the "pay-for," or the way lawmakers will fund the transportation measure.
Prior to passing a pair of short-term extensions of the current law that authorizes funding for transportation, the House had proposed a five-year, $260 billion version. In addition to the longer length of time and higher amount, the House measure proposed paying for additional transportation spending beyond the roughly $35 billion that is brought in by the federal tax on gasoline by increasing domestic oil drilling.
The Senate-passed version of the measure uses a packages of tax loopholes lawmakers say can be closed to make up the approximately $13 billion difference.
Despite the vastly different approaches of the chapters, Reid said Tuesday"the pay-for on this bill isn't that difficult.
"I don't think that's going to hold things up," Reid said.
Reid did not mention one of the biggest areas of disagreement between his chamber and the Republican-led House: the inclusion of a provision mandating the approval of the Keystone XL oil pipeline.
However, there have been indications the provision might not survive the negotiations.