A Senate panel voted Tuesday to advance legislation that would block states from imposing labeling requirements for genetically modified foods.
"Now is not the time for Congress to make food more expensive for anyone,” said Sen. Pat RobertsPat RobertsCNN's Acosta: 'The fix is in' on who gets to ask Trump questions GOP senators to Trump: We support 'maintaining and expanding' Gitmo Kansas treasurer wins GOP nomination to fill House seat MORE (R-Kan.), who sponsored the bill.
Supporters of the bill say that a patchwork of state rules will make it more costly for food companies to comply and that those costs will be passed on to consumers. They also say that additional labeling requirements are unnecessary for foods that have already been deemed safe by the government.
But Democrats who oppose the bill say consumers have a right to know what’s in the food they’re eating.
The GOP-backed bill would “move production methods into the shadows” and “give agriculture a black eye,” said Sen. Patrick LeahyPatrick LeahyVerizon angling to lower price of Yahoo purchase: report Dem senators call for independent Flynn probe Overnight Cybersecurity: White House does damage control on Flynn | Pressure builds for probe MORE (D-Vt.).
“The legislation undermines the public’s right to know,” he added.
The bill would replace state-by-state mandatory GMO labeling requirements with a voluntary national standard.
The committee’s top Democrat, Sen. Debbie StabenowDebbie StabenowTrump's pick to lead Medicare won't say if she supports negotiating prices with drug companies Overnight Finance: Fed chief tries to stay above partisan fray | Bill would eliminate consumer agency | Trump signs repeal of SEC rule on foreign payments Lawmakers urge Trump to raise trade issues with Abe MORE (Mich.) said it does not go far enough to protect consumers.
“It must contain a pathway to a national system of mandatory disclosures for consumers,” she said. “The bill before us today does not meet that important requirement. A voluntary program is not enough to meet consumer demand. That’s why I will not be voting for it."