Five Senate Democrats are sponsoring a bill that tries to fix what they call an oversight in how Native Americans and Alaskan Natives are treated under ObamaCare.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) contains a number of special provisions for Native Americans, including an exemption from the requirement that all Americans obtain health insurance, known as the individual mandate.
The lawmakers are concerned, however, that the current law contains multiple definitions of “Indian,” which can lead to inconsistent benefits.
The healthcare law only recognizes Native Americans who are members of a federally recognized tribe or corporation.
That’s a narrower definition than is used by Medicaid, however, as well as the Indian Health Service, which provides health services to Native American communities.
As a result, people recognized by those programs but who aren’t members of tribes could miss out on special cost-sharing provisions provided for them under the ACA. They also could lose their ability to enroll in plans bought in new health insurance marketplaces on a month-to-month basis, rather than during certain enrollment periods.
The new bill would align the Affordable Care Act definition of Native Americans and Alaska Natives to that used by other laws.
“I have heard from Alaska Tribal Health organizations for months about the urgent need to introduce legislation that will serve as a technical fix within the ACA to broaden the definition of Indian as applied to Alaska Natives,” said Sen. Mark BegichMark BegichPerez creates advisory team for DNC transition The future of the Arctic 2016’s battle for the Senate: A shifting map MORE (D-Alaska).
Earlier this year, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a regulation making sure that the discrepancy between different health programs would not force Native Americans to pay a tax penalty for going without health insurance. Tribal health advocates, though, say that legislation is required to cement that exemption.
Sens. Max BaucusMax BaucusGOP hasn’t reached out to centrist Dem senators Five reasons why Tillerson is likely to get through Business groups express support for Branstad nomination MORE (D-Mont.), Tom UdallTom UdallDems introduce MAR-A-LAGO Act to publish visitor logs The Hill’s Whip List: Where Dems stand on Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Overnight Tech: FCC chief says media isn't 'the enemy of the people' | Fallout from Comey's testimony | Google apologizes for ads near extremist content | US preps electronics ban on some flights MORE (D-N.M.) and Al FrankenAl FrankenFriends, foes spar in fight on Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Lawmakers share photos of their dogs in honor of National Puppy Day Franken challenges witness endorsement of Gorsuch MORE (D-Minn.) also co-sponsored the legislation.