NLRB head: 'We owe it to the public to continue to work'

"I do not question their qualifications. They all have distinguished backgrounds," said Sen. Lamar AlexanderAndrew (Lamar) Lamar AlexanderWeek ahead: Senators near deal to stabilize ObamaCare markets Corker pressed as reelection challenges mount Overnight Health Care: CBO predicts 15 percent ObamaCare premium hike | Trump calls Sanders single-payer plan ‘curse on the US’ | Republican seeks score of Sanders’s bill MORE (R-Tenn), the top Republican on the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. "My problem is that they continue to decide cases after the federal appellate court unanimously decided they were unconstitutionally appointed."

Should the White House nominate members through normal channels, he added, "I will pledge to work with the chairman for their speedy confirmation."

In January, the court ruled that Obama's made the appointments during a period in 2012 when the Senate was not technically in recess. The chamber was holding brief, pro-forma sessions every few days.

The Obama administration has since appealed the case to the Supreme Court.

Currently, the board, which protects union activity and worker rights, has two vacancies in addition to the two disputed members. If those two were removed, it would have just one member, short of the three necessary to take formal action.

In February, Obama renominated the two NLRB members whose appointments the court had found unconstitutional, and in April he renominated Gaston Pearce and submitted two new members to the Senate, Harry Johnson and Philip Miscimarra.

"If I could have chosen I would have preferred my potential service on the board to have come at a when the agency was not enmeshed in profound constitutional and political disagreements," said Johnson said. "But here we are, and here I am, because I said yes."

In reaction to the federal court ruling, Republicans in the House voted in April to freeze all of the board's current work and block all of its current enforcement actions. Senate Republicans have pressed a similar measure and repeated their calls for the members to resign on Thursday.

Liberal members on the panel complained of a pattern of Republican opposition, pointing to struggles of nominees to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Labor and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Many Republicans "are actively trying to shut the NLRB down," said Tom HarkinTom HarkinDistance education: Tumultuous today and yesterday Grassley challenger no stranger to defying odds Clinton ally stands between Sanders and chairmanship dream MORE (D-Iowa), the committee's chairman.

"This is about complete obstructionism because a minority of senators don't like the agencies and they don't like the work these agencies do," Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Ann WarrenSenate Dems hold floor talk-a-thon against latest ObamaCare repeal bill Trump bets base will stick with him on immigration Dems call for action against Cassidy-Graham ObamaCare repeal MORE (D-Mass.) added.

Sen. Bernie SandersBernard (Bernie) SandersOvernight Defense: Senate passes 0B defense bill | 3,000 US troops heading to Afghanistan | Two more Navy officials fired over ship collisions Senate passes 0B defense bill Dems fear lasting damage from Clinton-Sanders fight MORE (I-Vt.) pushed Democrats to deploy the so-called "nuclear option" of altering Senate rules to prevent a filibuster of the nominees.

"If once again this effort is obstructed, if the goal is to prevent the NLRB from functioning in terms of protecting the rights of American workers, I think we should change the rules and take a majority vote to not only see that these people are seated so that they can do their job, but that other nominees who have been clearly obstructed should also have a chance to do their job," he told the committee.

The panel will vote Wednesday morning to send the package of nominees to the full Senate.