Liberal group stands with Warren against bipartisan regs reform package

Liberal group stands with Warren against bipartisan regs reform package
© Greg Nash

Liberal activist organization Credo Action has launched a petition aimed at destroying a regulatory reform package that the group says would weaken Wall Street watchdog agencies.

The petition, which has 6,410 signatures so far, asks Senate Democrats to stand with Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Ann WarrenTrump to nominate budget official as next consumer bureau chief Sessions floats federal law that would protect states that decriminalize marijuana Bank regulator faces backlash over comments on racism MORE (D-Mass.) against bills that it says would sabotage financial regulation.

ADVERTISEMENT
The New York Times reported last week that the package, being worked on by a bipartisan group of lawmakers, is likely to include a measure to subject independent agencies such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Securities and Exchange Commission to a strict cost-benefit analysis and review process for major rules.

Credo Action said the bills would undermine regulators that are needed to make sure capitalism works.

"They make sure markets are fair, protect our air and our water, and ensure that we’re not taken advantage of giant corporations or gouged by Wall Street banks,” the group’s petition said. “We need to reform and strengthen our regulators and make sure they are always working for us, not tie up their hands.”

In a statement to The Hill, Warren said federal rulemaking is broken because there are too many opportunities for powerful industry groups to rig the process.

"Reform is badly needed, but this package heads in the wrong direction, giving lobbyists and lawyers more chances to block outcomes they don't like," she said. "Reform should focus on a level playing field for working families and small businesses, not more ways to tilt the game for the rich and powerful.”

But Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), who is part of the rule-writing process, said the bills aim to create a more efficient regulatory process that ultimately produces better regulations.

“Many regulations provide certainty to the marketplace and provide us with clean air and water but, unfortunately, too many federal rules are unnecessarily burdensome to families and businesses,” he said in a statement to The Hill. “Through many hearings and conversations with stakeholders, it is apparent that the regulatory process needs updating to prevent bad regulations from raising prices on consumers.”

In addition to Lankford, Sens. Ron JohnsonRonald (Ron) Harold JohnsonSenate probes FBI's heavy-handed use of redactions to obstruct congressional investigators Hillicon Valley: DHS gets new cyber chief | White House warns lawmakers not to block ZTE deal | White nationalists find home on Google Plus | Comcast outbids Disney for Fox | Anticipation builds for report on FBI Clinton probe Graham jokes about Corker: GOP would have to be organized to be a cult MORE (R-Wis.) and Roy BluntRoy Dean BluntErnst, Fischer to square off for leadership post Facebook gives 500 pages of answers to lawmakers' data privacy questions Community development impact remains clear with NMTC post-tax reform MORE (R-Mo.), Heidi HeitkampMary (Heidi) Kathryn HeitkampTrump announces North Dakota rally for June 27 Opioid treatment plans must include a trauma-informed approach Dems seek to leverage ObamaCare fight for midterms MORE (D-N.D.), Joe ManchinJoseph (Joe) ManchinManchin touts support for Trump border wall in new ad Dems seek to leverage ObamaCare fight for midterms White House was in talks with Manchin to lead Veterans Affairs: report MORE (D-W.Va.), Mark WarnerMark Robert WarnerWray defends FBI after 'sobering' watchdog report Top Dems: IG report shows Comey's actions helped Trump win election Dem senator: Trump at G-7 made me ‘embarrassed for our country’ MORE (D-Va.) and Angus KingAngus Stanley KingHillicon Valley: Judge approves AT&T-Time Warner deal in blow to DOJ | Dems renew push to secure state voting systems | Seattle reverses course on tax after Amazon backlash | Trump, senators headed for cyber clash | More Tesla layoffs Trump, senators headed for clash on cyber policy For .2 billion, taxpayers should get more than Congress’s trial balloons MORE (I-Maine) are reportedly working on the package.  

The support from Democrats has outraged Credo Action.

“Conservatives have promoted ‘cost-benefit’ analysis as a way to paralyze the people who keep us safe, and Democrats should not be helping,” the group said in its petition.

While the legislation package will likely be introduced in the coming weeks, Lankford’s press secretary said Lankford is focused on the three regulatory bills he introduced with Heitkamp that the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee approved in October.

Those bills include the Smarter Regulations Through Advance Planning and Review Act, which would require agencies to plan for and conduct regular mandatory retrospective reviews on their most expensive rules; the Early Participation in Regulations Act of 2015, which would allow Americans to participate in the regulatory process earlier; and the Principled Rulemaking Act of 2015 that would ensure that agencies propose rules that address verifiable problems.

This story was updated at 2:48 p.m.