Liberal group stands with Warren against bipartisan regs reform package

Greg Nash

Liberal activist organization Credo Action has launched a petition aimed at destroying a regulatory reform package that the group says would weaken Wall Street watchdog agencies.

The petition, which has 6,410 signatures so far, asks Senate Democrats to stand with Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenWATCH LIVE: Warren campaigns for Clinton in NH Fifteen years since pivotal executive order, STORM Act could help fight terror finance Wells Fargo scandal should be major campaign issue MORE (D-Mass.) against bills that it says would sabotage financial regulation.

ADVERTISEMENT
The New York Times reported last week that the package, being worked on by a bipartisan group of lawmakers, is likely to include a measure to subject independent agencies such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Securities and Exchange Commission to a strict cost-benefit analysis and review process for major rules.

Credo Action said the bills would undermine regulators that are needed to make sure capitalism works.

"They make sure markets are fair, protect our air and our water, and ensure that we’re not taken advantage of giant corporations or gouged by Wall Street banks,” the group’s petition said. “We need to reform and strengthen our regulators and make sure they are always working for us, not tie up their hands.”

In a statement to The Hill, Warren said federal rulemaking is broken because there are too many opportunities for powerful industry groups to rig the process.

"Reform is badly needed, but this package heads in the wrong direction, giving lobbyists and lawyers more chances to block outcomes they don't like," she said. "Reform should focus on a level playing field for working families and small businesses, not more ways to tilt the game for the rich and powerful.”

But Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), who is part of the rule-writing process, said the bills aim to create a more efficient regulatory process that ultimately produces better regulations.

“Many regulations provide certainty to the marketplace and provide us with clean air and water but, unfortunately, too many federal rules are unnecessarily burdensome to families and businesses,” he said in a statement to The Hill. “Through many hearings and conversations with stakeholders, it is apparent that the regulatory process needs updating to prevent bad regulations from raising prices on consumers.”

In addition to Lankford, Sens. Ron JohnsonRon JohnsonSenate rivals gear up for debates The Trail 2016: Trump seizes on Charlotte violence The Hill's 12:30 Report MORE (R-Wis.) and Roy BluntRoy BluntSenate rivals gear up for debates Super PAC hits Dem Senate candidate with ad in tightening Missouri race The Trail 2016: Presidential politics and policing MORE (R-Mo.), Heidi HeitkampHeidi HeitkampOvernight Finance: McConnell offers 'clean' funding bill | Dems pan proposal | Flint aid, internet measure not included | More heat for Wells Fargo | New concerns on investor visas Iran president hints at future prisoner swaps, cash settlements with US Senators buck spending bill over Export-Import Bank MORE (D-N.D.), Joe ManchinJoe ManchinDemocrat vows to go after opioid makers – including daughter's company Overnight Healthcare: McConnell unveils new Zika package | Manchin defends daughter on EpiPens | Bill includes M for opioid crisis Democrat defends daughter after tough EpiPen grilling MORE (D-W.Va.), Mark WarnerMark Warner5 questions about the Yahoo hack Dem senator calls for probe over Yahoo hack Overnight Tech: Pressure builds ahead of TV box vote | Intel Dems warn about Russian election hacks | Spending bill doesn't include internet measure MORE (D-Va.) and Angus KingAngus KingWells CEO Stumpf resigns from Fed advisory panel Pentagon chief: 9/11 bill could be used against US troops GOP chairman: White House ‘running rogue’ on water rule MORE (I-Maine) are reportedly working on the package.  

The support from Democrats has outraged Credo Action.

“Conservatives have promoted ‘cost-benefit’ analysis as a way to paralyze the people who keep us safe, and Democrats should not be helping,” the group said in its petition.

While the legislation package will likely be introduced in the coming weeks, Lankford’s press secretary said Lankford is focused on the three regulatory bills he introduced with Heitkamp that the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee approved in October.

Those bills include the Smarter Regulations Through Advance Planning and Review Act, which would require agencies to plan for and conduct regular mandatory retrospective reviews on their most expensive rules; the Early Participation in Regulations Act of 2015, which would allow Americans to participate in the regulatory process earlier; and the Principled Rulemaking Act of 2015 that would ensure that agencies propose rules that address verifiable problems.

This story was updated at 2:48 p.m.