The Hill
Monday, May 12, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow The Executive arrow Navy cancels combat ship as costs escalate
The Executive PDF Print E-mail
Navy cancels combat ship as costs escalate
Posted: 11/02/07 07:38 PM [ET]
Faced with escalating program costs, the Navy is canceling construction on its fourth Littoral Combat Ship, built by General Dynamics.

The Navy has already canceled construction on the third Littoral Combat Ship (LCS), which was being built by Lockheed Martin, after the company turned down a Navy offer to go to a fixed-price contract.

Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics both have contracts to build the LCS, with Lockheed building the first and third ships and General Dynamics building the second and fourth.

The Littoral Combat Ship is a relatively small warship designed to operate near shorelines.

The LCS program has been plagued by cost overruns. The Navy learned the first Lockheed LCS would cost more than $400 million, far above initial estimates of $220 million. The Navy has acknowledged that LCS costs have ballooned up to 75 percent.

Given the cost growth, the Navy decided not to authorize construction of the fourth ship and sought to restructure its contract agreement with General Dynamics.

But the service and General Dynamics could not reach an agreement, according to an announcement made by Navy Secretary Donald Winter and Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead.

“We are disappointed that the Navy has decided to reject the proposal,” a General Dynamics spokesman said.

“Despite this outcome, we remain focused on completing LCS 2 and delivering the most capable, most affordable ship we can to the U.S. Navy.”

Both service leaders said the Navy is still committed to the LCS.

“LCS continues to be a critical warfighting requirement for our Navy to maintain dominance in the littorals and strategic choke points around the world,” said Winter.

“While this is a difficult decision, we recognize that active oversight and strict cost controls in the early years are necessary to ensuring we can deliver these ships to the fleet over the long term.”
 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.