Dems propose timeline for Garland
© Greg Nash

Senate Democrats are offering up a timeline for moving on Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland, including a first hearing next month. 

 
ADVERTISEMENT
"Our constitutional role in providing advice and consent on the president's nominees is no different in our first year or sixth year as senators. And it is no different in an election year," they wrote in the letter, which was sent Monday. 
 
Democrats want Garland's Judiciary Committee hearing to start on April 27, a committee vote by May 12 and a full Senate vote by May 25. 
 
The timeline, they write, is based on the average confirmation time for Supreme Court nominees since 1975. 
 
"We hope and expect the pending nominee will receive the same timely consideration that Supreme Court nominees have received for the last 40 years," they added. 
 
The letter comes as Democrats and outside groups continue to hope an onslaught of pressure will force GOP leadership to cave and take up Garland's nomination. 
 
Top Republicans, however, have shown no signs of cracking. 
 
Speaking to constituents in Iowa Monday, Grassley defended his position, saying the presidential election would politicize a Supreme Court nomination. 
 
"It's not fair to the country; it's not fair to the Senate; it's not fair to the nominee to put the person, in the words Biden used, in the cauldron of a presidential election year. When things are so highly politicized that that takes priority over the consideration," he told KSFY, a Sioux Falls, South Dakota, ABC station. 
 
Democratic Sens. Patrick LeahyPatrick Joseph LeahyDemocrats press for action on election security The Hill's Morning Report — Biden steadies in third debate as top tier remains the same Overnight Defense: Dems grill Trump Army, Air Force picks | House chair subpoenas Trump Afghanistan negotiator | Trump officials release military aid to Ukraine MORE (Vt.), Dianne FeinsteinDianne Emiel FeinsteinGrassley: Kavanaugh classmate didn't contact Senate panel Trump court pick sparks frustration for refusing to answer questions This week: Congress returns for first time since mass shootings MORE (Calif.), Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerSchumer, Pelosi push Trump to back universal background check bill Sinema says she would back Kennedy in race against Markey Democrats threaten to withhold defense votes over wall MORE (N.Y.), Dick DurbinRichard (Dick) Joseph DurbinKavanaugh impeachment push hits Capitol buzz saw Democrats seize Senate floor to protest gun inaction: 'Put up or shut up' Pressley on Kavanaugh impeachment: 'Deeply disturbing' that a justice 'could have this many allegations' MORE (Ill.), Sheldon WhitehouseSheldon WhitehouseKavanaugh impeachment push hits Capitol buzz saw Senate GOP pledges to oppose any efforts to 'pack' Supreme Court Senate Democrats push Trump to permanently shutter migrant detention facility MORE (R.I.), Amy KlobucharAmy Jean KlobucharMark Mellman: The most important moment in history? Democrats press for action on election security Antitrust enforcers in turf war over Big Tech MORE (Minn.), Al FrankenAlan (Al) Stuart FrankenThe Hill's Morning Report - What is Trump's next move on Iran? The Memo: Times correction gives GOP lifeline in latest Kavanaugh controversy Politicon announces lineup including Comey, Hannity, Priebus MORE (Minn.), Chris CoonsChristopher (Chris) Andrew CoonsBill to return B in unredeemed bonds advances Grassley: Kavanaugh classmate didn't contact Senate panel Democratic senator: Attacks on Saudi oil refineries 'may call for military action against Iran' MORE (Del.) and Richard Blumenthal (Conn.) signed the letter.