Conway's husband pens op-ed calling Trump's birthright proposal 'unconstitutional'
© Getty Images

George Conway, the husband of White House counselor Kellyanne ConwayKellyanne Elizabeth ConwayTrump’s polls sag amid wall fight George Conway: Nothing Trump says 'can be taken at face value' Sarah Sanders and CNN's Acosta trade barbs over border visit MORE, co-wrote an op-ed on Tuesday rejecting President TrumpDonald John TrumpHouse Freedom Caucus calls for Congress to work on shutdown through break Democrat previews Mueller questions for Trump’s AG nominee Trump inaugural committee spent ,000 on makeup for aides: report MORE's assertion that he could do away with birthright citizenship through an executive order.

"Such a move would be unconstitutional and would certainly be challenged. And the challengers would undoubtedly win," Conway wrote in The Washington Post with attorney Neal Katyal.

Conway, a self-described conservative, and Katyal, a self-described liberal, argued that the authors of the Constitution's 14th Amendment were "simple and clear" in drafting a provision that meant anyone born in the United States is a citizen of the country.

ADVERTISEMENT

The two lawyers further cited a 1898 Supreme Court Case, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, in which the court ruled that "all children here born of resident aliens" were granted citizenship by birth, except in cases of foreign occupiers and foreign diplomats.

"Neither of those narrow exceptions supports what proposes to do by executive order,” Conway and Katyal wrote. “He is threatening, with the stroke of a pen, to declare certain people who are born in the United States ineligible for citizenship — despite the plain words of the 14th Amendment."

A key difference, critics have noted, is that in the 1898 case, both parents had established permanent residence in the U.S.

In an interview with Axios released Tuesday, Trump vowed to end citizenship for children of nonlegal residents born in the U.S., a change he proposed during the 2016 campaign, even though birthright citizenship is enshrined under the 14th Amendment.

Trump did not say when he would sign such an order, but it is the latest example of the president deploying hard-line rhetoric to gin up discussion about immigration in the closing stretch of the midterms.

Speaker Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanAnti-Defamation League calls on House leaders to censure Steve King over white supremacy comments Former Ryan fundraisers launch firm Romney writes new chapter in his like-hate relationship with Trump MORE (R-Wis.), Sen. Jeff FlakeJeffrey (Jeff) Lane FlakeThe Hill's Morning Report — Trump eyes wall money options as shutdown hits 21 days Poll: Sanders most popular senator, Flake least CBS News in talks to hire Flake: report MORE (R-Ariz.) and Sen. Chuck GrassleyCharles (Chuck) Ernest GrassleyMcConnell rebukes Steve King over white nationalist comments Congressional Black Caucus calls for Steve King to be removed from committees Grassley, Ernst condemn Steve King's 'white supremacist' comments MORE (R-Iowa) were among the lawmakers who promptly refuted Trump's claim that he could unilaterally make such a sweeping change.

"Well, you obviously cannot do that. You cannot end birthright citizenship with an executive order," Ryan told Lexington, Ky., radio station WVLK on Tuesday.

Conway and Katyal wrote that the unconstitutionality of Trump's proposal serves as a reminder that the Constitution can be a unifying document in politically divisive times.

"The fact that the two of us, one a conservative and the other a liberal, agree on this much despite our sharp policy differences underscores something it is critically important to remember," they wrote. "Our Constitution is a bipartisan document, designed to endure for ages. Its words have meaning that cannot be wished away."

Conway has repeatedly drawn attention on social media during Trump's tenure, frequently sharing news articles and opinions on Twitter that are critical of his wife's boss.