Toobin: Acting Attorney General Whitaker is 'obscure' and 'unqualified'
© Getty Images

CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin on Thursday questioned the qualifications of President TrumpDonald John TrumpGraham to introduce resolution condemning House impeachment inquiry Support for impeachment inches up in poll Fox News's Bret Baier calls Trump's attacks on media 'a problem' MORE's pick for acting attorney general, arguing that he was chosen largely because of his past comments about special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) Swan MuellerFox News legal analyst says Trump call with Ukraine leader could be 'more serious' than what Mueller 'dragged up' Lewandowski says Mueller report was 'very clear' in proving 'there was no obstruction,' despite having 'never' read it Fox's Cavuto roasts Trump over criticism of network MORE.

On "New Day," Toobin exchanged thoughts with former independent counsel Kenneth Starr about Trump's decision to appoint Matthew Whitaker, chief of staff to Jeff SessionsJefferson (Jeff) Beauregard SessionsSanctuary city policies are a threat to decent people Trump attacks Sessions: A 'total disaster' and 'an embarrassment to the great state of Alabama' Ocasio-Cortez fires back at Washington Times after story on her 'high-dollar hairdo' MORE, as head of the Justice Department on a temporary basis. Sessions resigned Wednesday as attorney general at Trump's request.

"You know the Department of Justice. You know the kind of people who are named attorney general of the United States -- senators, judges," Toobin said. "What about naming someone, frankly, this obscure and this unqualified just because he’s been critical of the Mueller investigation. What do you think about that choice?"

ADVERTISEMENT

Starr called Toobin's characterization "a little bit unfair," while noting that Deputy Attorney General Rod RosensteinRod RosensteinTrump attacks Sessions: A 'total disaster' and 'an embarrassment to the great state of Alabama' Mueller rejoins DC law firm Lewandowski says Mueller report was 'very clear' in proving 'there was no obstruction,' despite having 'never' read it MORE would have been a "natural" choice to replace Sessions.

"He’s not unqualified," Starr said of Whitaker. "Is he the most qualified? We can debate that, but he’s not been taken off the street."

Whitaker has come under scrutiny in the wake of his appointment for opinion pieces he wrote in The Hill and CNN advocating for curbing the scope of the Russia investigation, and suggesting stifling its funding.

Democrats have called on Whitaker to recuse himself from overseeing Mueller's probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible ties between Moscow and the Trump campaign.

Sessions was effectively fired on Wednesday, submitting a resignation letter at Trump's request. His ouster followed months of public ridicule by the president, who regularly lamented Sessions's decision to recuse himself from overseeing the Russia investigation.