House panel approves controversial changes to Violence Against Women Act
© Greg Nash

Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday voted to approve a reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) in a party-line 22-11 vote, sending it to the full chamber.

The law, which includes programs and measures to protect women from domestic abuse, lapsed on Feb. 15 after lawmakers failed to include an extension in a broader spending bill.

The act was first passed in 1994 and has been reauthorized three times. But the current bill offers expanded protections for transgender persons, including access to shelters, and measures that could make it harder for convicted abusers to purchase firearms, sparking controversy.

ADVERTISEMENT

“VAWA, which is not gender-exclusive, addresses the needs of men and women, children, persons with disabilities, homeless persons and LGBTQ people among others,” Judiciary Chairman Jerrold NadlerJerrold (Jerry) Lewis NadlerHouse to vote on bill to ensure citizenship for children of overseas service members As impeachment goes public, forget 'conventional wisdom' What this 'impeachment' is really about — and it's not the Constitution MORE (D-N.Y.) said during the committee markup.

He said the expanded bill before the committee included "new protections for transgender individuals by making them newly eligible for certain DOJ grants and by ensuring that their gender identity is properly recognized by the Bureau of Prisons.”

But Republicans on the committee questioned many of the changes, highlighting concerns over transgender protections, access to abortions and how the bill treats faith-based groups.

Ranking member Doug CollinsDouglas (Doug) Allen CollinsGOP eager for report on alleged FBI surveillance abuse House to vote on bill to ensure citizenship for children of overseas service members GOP lawmaker: Schiff should be first witness Republicans call to testify in impeachment inquiry MORE (R-Ga.) worried that by rushing the bill Democrats were endangering the women it aimed to protect.

“It is my sincere hope that we can ultimately work together to authorize VAWA in a thoughtful and meaningful way that preserves the intent of the law," Collins said. "I cannot, however, support the legislation my colleagues have put forward as it politicizes and weaponizes a program and a law that for years was non-controversial and bipartisan.”

“This bill is a Democratic wish list of campaign promises,” said Rep. John RatcliffeJohn Lee RatcliffeLatest impeachment developments: Republicans huddle ahead of Friday's hearing House Republicans call impeachment hearing 'boring,' dismiss Taylor testimony as hearsay Key takeaways from first public impeachment hearing MORE (R-Texas). “It is not a good faith effort to pass a bipartisan and noncontroversial reauthorization.”

Democrats blocked proposed amendments that would have limited access for transgender individuals at shelters.

Reps. Sheila Jackson LeeSheila Jackson LeeConsequential GOP class of 1994 all but disappears Video of Greta Thunberg crossing paths with Trump at UN goes viral Lewandowski: House testimony shows I'd be 'a fighter' in the Senate MORE (D-Texas) and David CicillineDavid Nicola CicillineHillicon Valley: Federal inquiry opened into Google health data deal | Facebook reports millions of post takedowns | Microsoft shakes up privacy debate | Disney plus tops 10M sign-ups in first day Top antitrust Dem presses DOJ, FTC on Google's Fitbit acquisition Hillicon Valley: California AG reveals Facebook investigation | McConnell criticizes Twitter's political ad ban | Lawmakers raise concerns over Google takeover of Fitbit | Dem pushes FCC to secure 5G networks MORE (D-R.I.) cited higher rates of domestic and sexual violence against the LGBTQ community to defend the bill's broader protections.

“It is not a violation of privacy simply to have to share a space with a transgender person,” Lee said. “We do not want to exclude anyone that has suffered abuse.”

While the act has lapsed, many programs for survivors of sexual assault and domestic violence are still being funded through the Department of Justice and the Department of Health and Human Services.

Updated at 6:17 p.m.