There's no "ethical imperative" for superdelegates to support the popular vote winner, writes Zvika Krieger. Superdelegates, unlike voters in early primaries, know much more about the candidates and how they'll perform in the general election, she writes. With questions raised about Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaTrump averages highest approval rating of his presidency in second quarter: Gallup The Hill's Morning Report - Trump seizes House impeachment vote to rally GOP Democrats warm to idea of studying reparations MORE's strength against John McCainJohn Sidney McCainThe peculiar priorities of Adam Schiff Ocasio-Cortez fires back at Lindsey Graham: 'Graham wants to bring back 1950s McCarthyism' Meghan McCain knocks Lindsey Graham for defending Trump's tweets: 'This is not the person I used to know' MORE, superdelegates would be justified voting against him, she adds. It would be unjustified to support Chuck Norris's illegal immigration plan, according to Josh Patashnik. The lord of the roundhouse kick would let authorities kill unauthorized border crossers, just like they can do with people who illegally enter Area 51. Norris's logic is "interesting," Patashnik concludes.