There's no "ethical imperative" for superdelegates to support the popular vote winner, writes Zvika Krieger. Superdelegates, unlike voters in early primaries, know much more about the candidates and how they'll perform in the general election, she writes. With questions raised about Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaCombatting fake news on social media will take a village Is Trudeau on the verge of a shocking reversal of fortune? Even with likely Trump impeachment, Democrats face uphill climb to win presidency MORE's strength against John McCainJohn Sidney McCainCummings to lie in state at the Capitol Elizabeth Warren should concern Donald Trump 'bigly' Lawmakers toast Greta Van Susteren's new show MORE, superdelegates would be justified voting against him, she adds. It would be unjustified to support Chuck Norris's illegal immigration plan, according to Josh Patashnik. The lord of the roundhouse kick would let authorities kill unauthorized border crossers, just like they can do with people who illegally enter Area 51. Norris's logic is "interesting," Patashnik concludes.