Sen. Chuck GrassleyChuck GrassleyGOP blocks bill to expand gun background checks after Michigan school shooting GOP ramps up attacks on SALT deduction provision Graham emerges as go-to ally for Biden's judicial picks MORE (R-Iowa) says he doesn't care how history judges him for refusing to consider President Obama's next nominee for the Supreme Court.
“Do you think I spend my days wondering about how Chuck Grassley will go down in history?” he told reporters on Wednesday, according to The Des Moines Register.
"I don’t care if I ever go down in history,” added Grassley, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. "I’m here to do my job.”
Grassley waved off criticism from Senate Minority Leader Harry ReidHarry Mason ReidBottom line Voters need to feel the benefit, not just hear the message Schumer-McConnell dial down the debt ceiling drama MORE (D-Nev.) that he ranks among the “most obstructionist” lawmakers ever.
“I’ve been a leader on the Judiciary Committee for the last five years, first as ranking member and now as chairman,” he said.
"I think Congress has passed more than 320 judges and only disapproved two,” Grassley continued about his tenure. "So, if I wanted to obstruct, I could obstruct. But I think this proves we haven’t been doing that.”
Senate Republican Judiciary members vowed Tuesday not to hold hearings or votes on any nominee Obama taps to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia.
GOP lawmakers say the seat should be filled after the 2016 election, a stance Democrats have blasted.
Grassley said nominating a new justice would be an exercise in futility for Obama.
“Just think of the waste of taxpayers’ money,” he said. "If you’ve already got the Senate saying this ought to be put off — and the important words are let the people have a voice — then you’d be wasting that million dollars if it’s already a forgone conclusion.
“Not very often do the people have a chance to express the view on, ‘Do you want a very liberal person put on the court or a conservative person put on the court?’” Grassley said, urging that the nomination wait until after the election.
“So you’ve got an opportunity [with Democratic presidential front-runner] Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonRepublican Ohio Senate candidate slams JD Vance over previous Trump comments Budowsky: Why GOP donors flock to Manchin and Sinema Countering the ongoing Republican delusion MORE on one hand and whoever our Republican nominee is on the other hand. It highlights the importance of the Supreme Court."