Wall Street Journal editorial board rips Trump on Helsinki: It was a 'national embarrassment'
© Getty Images

The Wall Street Journal editorial board is slamming President TrumpDonald John TrumpThorny part of obstruction of justice is proving intent, that's a job for Congress Obama condemns attacks in Sri Lanka as 'an attack on humanity' Schiff rips Conway's 'display of alternative facts' on Russian election interference MORE over his press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday, calling it a “national embarrassment.”

“Details from the private Trump-Putin talks in Helsinki will spill out in coming days, but Monday’s joint press conference was a personal and national embarrassment,” the conservative newspaper said in a scathing editorial

“On stage with the dictator whose election meddling has done so much harm to his Presidency, Mr. Trump couldn’t even bring himself to say he believed his own intelligence advisers like Dan CoatsDaniel (Dan) Ray CoatsJordan, Meadows press intelligence chief on House Intel Russia probe transcripts Overnight Energy: John Kerry hits Trump over climate change at hearing | Defends Ocasio-Cortez from GOP attacks | Dems grill EPA chief over auto emissions rollback plan Kerry goes after Trump over climate on Capitol Hill MORE over the Russian strongman,” the piece continued.

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump drew swift, bipartisan backlash on Monday after he refuted his own intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election, saying while standing next to Putin that he doesn’t “see any reason” why Russia would have been behind the hacking.

He also said that Putin was “extremely strong and powerful in his denial” during the summit on Monday.

“Denials from liars usually are strong and powerful,” The Wall Street Journal said. “The charitable explanation for this kowtow to the Kremlin is that Mr. Trump can’t get past his fury that critics claim his election was tainted by Russian interference. And so he couldn’t resist, in front of the world, going off on a solipsistic ramble about “Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonThorny part of obstruction of justice is proving intent, that's a job for Congress Nadler: I don't understand why Mueller didn't charge Donald Trump Jr., others in Trump Tower meeting Kellyanne Conway: Mueller didn't need to use the word 'exoneration' in report MORE’s emails” and Democratic ‘servers.’”

The editorial went on to say that for a “rare moment” in his presidency, Trump “projected weakness" during the press conference.

“He was the one on stage beseeching Mr. Putin for a better relationship, while the Russian played it cool and matter of fact,” the Journal said. “Mr. Trump touted their personal rapport, saying the bilateral ‘relationship has never been worse than it is now. However, that changed as of about four hours ago. I really believe that.’ In four hours?” 

The editorial board said that Trump went “soft” on Putin, adding that will make it “even harder” for Trump to make deals with the Russian leader in the future. 

“Republicans and Democrats will unite in Congress, as they should, to limit his diplomatic running room,” the opinion piece concluded. “Mr. Trump may decide to court Mr. Putin anyway, like Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaObama condemns attacks in Sri Lanka as 'an attack on humanity' Trump hits Romney for Mueller criticism Former Bush assistant: Mueller report makes Obama look 'just plain bad' MORE did Iran’s mullahs, but political isolation concerning a foreign adversary is a weak and dangerous place to be.”

The Journal has occasionally criticized Trump in the past. In late June, the publication’s editorial board tore into his trade policies and warned that Republicans may suffer in the 2018 midterms due to the president's tariffs.