George ConwayGeorge Thomas ConwayGeorge Conway calls for Congress to remove Trump: He's 'a cancer' Conway's husband calls out Barr over original framing of Mueller report Conway's husband mocks Trump for giving advice to Boeing MORE on Sunday warned that there is a "critical distinction" between finding evidence President TrumpDonald John TrumpThorny part of obstruction of justice is proving intent, that's a job for Congress Obama condemns attacks in Sri Lanka as 'an attack on humanity' Schiff rips Conway's 'display of alternative facts' on Russian election interference MORE or his campaign colluded with Russia and concluding a crime was committed, suggesting evidence of collusion may exist.

Conway, an attorney and the husband of White House counselor Kellyanne ConwayKellyanne Elizabeth ConwaySchiff rips Conway's 'display of alternative facts' on Russian election interference Kellyanne Conway: Mueller didn't need to use the word 'exoneration' in report Giuliani: 'It would not have been obstruction' if Trump had fired Mueller MORE, said special counsel Robert MuellerRobert Swan MuellerSasse: US should applaud choice of Mueller to lead Russia probe MORE would have reported that he found no evidence of collusion if that was the case and that Attorney General William BarrWilliam Pelham BarrThorny part of obstruction of justice is proving intent, that's a job for Congress Mueller report unveils American democracy under Russian attack Kellyanne Conway: Mueller didn't need to use the word 'exoneration' in report MORE would have repeated that language in his summary to Congress.

"But Mueller didn’t, and Barr didn’t," George Conway, who is publicly critical of Trump tweeted.

ADVERTISEMENT

Barr in late March released to Congress a summary of Mueller's findings, the result of a nearly two-year investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible collusion between Trump's campaign and Moscow.

Mueller "did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities," according to a quote from Mueller's full report included in Barr's summary.

Barr in his summary wrote in his own words that Mueller "did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election."

Recent reports have raised questions about whether Barr's summary of Mueller's report was completely accurate. Democrats have demanded the release of the full report as well as its underlying evidence, in an effort to assess the conclusion Barr reported.

"He’s being as forthcoming as he can, and so this notion that he’s trying to mislead people, I think, is just completely bizarre," Deputy Attorney General Rod RosensteinRod Jay RosensteinKellyanne Conway: Mueller didn't need to use the word 'exoneration' in report Impeachment? Not so fast without missing element of criminal intent Collins: Mueller report includes 'an unflattering portrayal' of Trump MORE said last week, defending Barr's summary.

Barr said last week that he is on track to release a redacted version of the nearly 400-page report to Congress by mid-April.