The Big Question is a feature where influential lawmakers, pundits and interest group leaders give their answers to a question that’s driving discussion in news circles around the country.

Some responses are gathered via e-mail, while others are gathered in person via tape recorder.

Today’s Big Question is:
The Obama administration recently backed "card check." Would passing it or defeating it be a travesty?

See responses below from the Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.), Sen. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsDemocrats gear up to hit GOP senators on DACA OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Trump administration gives renewables more time to take advantage of tax credits | House Republicans introduce bill to speed mining projects for critical minerals | Watchdog faults EPA communications in contamination of NC river The Hill's Coronavirus Report: Unemployment claims now at 41 million with 2.1 million more added to rolls; Topeka mayor says cities don't have enough tests for minorities and homeless communities MORE (R-Maine), Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.), Sen. Mary LandrieuMary Loretta LandrieuA decade of making a difference: Senate Caucus on Foster Youth Congress needs to work to combat the poverty, abuse and neglect issues that children face Dems wrestle over how to vote on ‘Green New Deal’ MORE (D-La.), Sen. Jeff SessionsJefferson (Jeff) Beauregard SessionsThe Department of Justice should step aside in the George Floyd case The Memo: Trump tweets cross into new territory Sessions goes after Tuberville's coaching record in challenging him to debate MORE (R-Ala.), Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.), Rep. David Dreier (R-Calif.), AFL-CIO, SEIU, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Club for Growth, United Steelworkers, Americans United for Change, Dean Baker, Grover Norquist, William Redpath, Celinda Lake, Herb London, and the Family Research Council.

Read the last Big Question here.

Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.) said:
For anyone who values the secret ballot — a cornerstone of any Democracy — passage of Card Check would be a travesty.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said:
If you’re asking me if I’m opposed to “card check,” the answer would be yes because it would do away with the guarantee of a secret election to determine union representation... Read the full response here.

Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH) said:
Well, passing it would be taking away the rights of people to have a secret ballot, which sort of runs a little against the concept of a democracy.

Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) said:
I’m still considering my position on that.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) said:
I think card check would be a colossal error for us to make. It’s unthinkable to think that we would deny union members the right to be able to vote confidentially on whether they want to be in a union.

Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) said:
It’d be the worst things to ever happen to our country, from an economic standpoint and just from a basic right for Americans to have a secret ballot. It would destroy jobs and take away a basic American right... Read the full response here.

Sen. John McCainJohn Sidney McCainHow Obama just endorsed Trump Former Texas Rep. Sam Johnson dies at 89 Trump's needless nastiness and cruelty will catch up with him MORE (R-Ariz.) said:
It’d be a victory for organized labor and very harmful for America’s economy.

Sen. Bob CaseyRobert (Bob) Patrick CaseyOvernight Health Care: Trump says US 'terminating' relationship with WHO | Cuomo: NYC on track to start reopening week of June 8 | COVID-19 workplace complaints surge 10 things to know today about coronavirus The Hill's 12:30 Report - Presented by Facebook - Twitter says Trump violates rules with 'shooting' threat MORE (D-Pa.) said:
The passage of the Employee Free Choice Act would be a victory for workers and their families, but also for the economy. Read the full response here.

Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamSchumer to GOP: Cancel 'conspiracy hearings' on origins of Russia probe Graham announces hearing on police use of force after George Floyd killing In a new cold war with China, America may need to befriend Russia MORE (R-S.C.) said:
It would be devastating for the country. It’d be bad if it passed.

Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) said:
Look, I don’t think the bill, as it presently seems to be…I don’t think it will be the concept that will be voted on. I think there’s a lot of pressure to make some changes in it, and that’s why I withhold judgment until I see what the final version is.

Rep. David Dreier (R-Calif.) said:
I think it undermines those trying to create jobs. I think that the notion of preventing free and fair elections is what card check is all about. It’s just plain wrong to say we can have elections here within this institution and then deny them for union members. Read the full response here.

John Sweeney, president, AFL-CIO, said:
It would be a travesty for millions of hard working Americans if the Employee Free Choice Act is not passed.

All across America families are losing their jobs, homes, and healthcare. At the same time the CEO’s that ran companies into the ground are collecting millions of dollars in bonuses. This is happening because our economy has become fundamentally imbalanced with the wealth and power concentrated at the very top, and we’re witnessing the result. Read the full response here.

Anna Burger, secretary-treasurer, SEIU, said:
Right now, millions of working families are struggling — losing their jobs, their health care, and their retirement benefits. They’re working harder than ever before, yet they’re not able to share in the prosperity they helped create. Read the full response here.

Mike Eastman, Executive Director for Labor Policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said:
At a time when our full focus should be on stabilizing the economy passing the cynically named “Employee Free Choice Act” would certainly be a travesty; in fact it would be an outright disaster. As Randy Johnson, from the U.S. Chamber, has stated “This legislation is a bad idea any time, but is particularly irresponsible at a time when policy makers should be focusing on creating, not destroying, jobs.” Read the full response here.

Andy Roth, government affairs director, Club For Growth, said:
Passing ‘card check’ would greatly accelerate our country’s move towards big government socialism. The secret ballot is a cornerstone of our democracy and should be cherished. Plus, getting rid of it would devastate our economy and prolong our current financial crisis. Read the full response here.

Leo W. Gerard, USW International president, said:
“Card check” — the gross and deliberate misnomer for the Employee Free Choice Act — would wrest control of elections for union representation from employers and place it back in the hands of workers where it was when the Wagner Act was passed. Read the full response here.

Caren Benjamin, Deputy Executive Director of Americans United for Change, said:
The Employee Free Choice offers workers real access to the most effective middle-class protection program in the world – union membership. Union workers earn on average 28 percent more than their counterparts who don’t have access to a union. Read the full response here.

Dean Baker, Co-Director at the Center for Economic Policy and Research, said:
First, Let’s just be clear what “card check” does. Under the current law, workers may organize a union either through an NLRB certified election or by having a majority of their workers in a bargaining unit sign a card indicated their desire to be represented by a union. At present, it is up to the employer which route the workers have to take. Read the full response here.

Grover Norquist, President of Americans for Tax Reform, said:
Card Check is a nice way of saying “taking away the right of workers to vote on whether or not they would like a union.” Union membership should be voluntary. Truly voluntary. Read the full response here.

William Redpath, Chair of the Libertarian National Committee, said:
The Libertarian Party platform states, “We support the right of free persons to associate or not associate in labor unions, and an employer should have the right to recognize or refuse to recognize a union.” Read the full response here.

Celinda Lake, president, Lake Research Partners, said:
Defeating it would be an outrage and a travesty. The current system gives workers no choice at all because they are routinely harassed or fired by employers during the period before the “election”. Polls show most workers would like to join a union — especially younger workers. Read the full response here.

Herb London, President of the Hudson Institute, said:
“Card check” is a violation of an essential American principle i.e. a person has the right to vote in private so that tacit or overt intimidation can be avoided. This proposal is seemingly a concession to union bosses that emerged from support during the Obama campaign effort. Read the full response here.

Tom McClusky, Senior Vice President of FRCAction, said:
Passing card check would be a travesty. KA-CHING! What was that sound? It was the labor union bosses cashing in on the millions of dollars they have not only given to mostly liberal Democratic candidates but also to Democratic causes such as attempting to defeat various state marriage amendments and in crushing parental consent measures in the states for young girls seeking an abortion. Read the full response here.