President TrumpDonald TrumpStowaway found in landing gear of plane after flight from Guatemala to Miami Kushner looking to Middle East for investors in new firm: report GOP eyes booting Democrats from seats if House flips MORE’s proposal to remove roadless rule protections and allow destructive roadbuilding throughout Alaska’s majestic Tongass National Forest is bad for our environment, bad for taxpayers, and bad for future generations of Americans who deserve to visit and appreciate this beautiful, pristine place. That’s why it is opposed by a majority of Americans and Alaskans, including fisherman, sportsman, local businesses, and tribal nations who have sacred ties to the land, and why the administration should not move forward with this plan.
Spanning 500 miles along Southeast Alaska’s panhandle, the Tongass is defined by thousands of islands, massive old-growth trees—some more than 1,000 years old—and, importantly, 32 federally-recognized Alaska Native Communities who have lived off these lands since time immemorial. The Tongass is also critically important to our fight against climate change, sequestering hundreds of millions of tons of carbon from our atmosphere.
For nearly two decades, millions of acres of the Tongass and other National Forests have been protected by a simple, flexible, and effective conservation safeguard known as the roadless rule. Finalized in 2001, the roadless rule protected some of the last truly wild places in our National Forest System from environmentally damaging roadbuilding and commercial logging. The application of the roadless rule was particularly important to Alaska where decades of federally subsidized clear-cut logging have harmed our air, water, and wildlife habitat.
Unfortunately, the Trump administration is threatening to expand destructive clear-cut logging by proposing to exempt the entire Tongass from roadless rule protections. After an oversight hearing the Natural Resources Committee held with experts and the Forest Service last month, it became clear that only one special interest group will benefit from an Alaska Roadless Rule exemption: the timber industry.
Removing roadless protections from Tongass National Forest would open broad swaths of pristine, old-grown rainforest and ancient, irreplaceable trees to clear-cut logging and roadbuilding. Worse, experts testified that expensive roadbuilding in this harsh terrain will be subsidized to the tune of millions of dollars by American taxpayers. This has drawn bipartisan criticism.
This administration’s attempt to use taxpayer dollars to artificially prop up logging and roadbuilding efforts throughout the Tongass would not only harm our environment but undermine flourishing commercial fishing, recreation and tourism industries – which together make up 26 percent of regional Southeast Alaskan employment – that depend on the preservation of the forest.
The Forest Service is accepting public comments on their proposed Alaska Roadless Exemption through Dec. 17. We cannot allow the destruction of our nation’s national treasures on our watch. I urge you to join me in sharing your strong opposition to this harmful exemption with the Forest Service.
In addition to leading my colleagues in submitting official comments in opposition, I, along with Sen. Maria CantwellMaria Elaine CantwellScott says he will block nominees until Biden officials testify on supply chain crisis Airlines staff up for holiday onslaught Manchin set to make or break Biden's climate pledge MORE (D-Wash.), have introduced the Roadless Area Conservation Act to make the roadless rule permanent law and prevent Trump or any other president from threatening our nation’s most precious natural resources.
Our public lands belong to all of us, not special interests. We have a responsibility to ensure that special places like Tongass National Forest are protected not only for local economies, fishermen, sportsmen and tribes, but for future generations of Americans to enjoy.
Gallego represents Arizona’s 7th District and is a member of the Natural Resources Committee.