How a tied Senate could lead a divided America
© Getty Images

All eyes now turn to Georgia, with not one but two runoffs in Senate elections that will determine whether Republicans hold onto a narrow, but crucial, majority at 52-48 or 51-49, or fall back into a 50-50 tie. With the presidential election highly likely to be decided in favor of Vice President Biden, a 50-50 Senate tie could make new vice president, Kamala HarrisKamala HarrisMiddle East: Quick start for Biden diplomacy Hillicon Valley: GOP chairman says defense bill leaves out Section 230 repeal | Senate panel advances FCC nominee | Krebs says threats to election officials 'undermining democracy' Top intelligence official says China targeting foreign influence at incoming Biden administration MORE, the ultimate power-broker in the Senate.

Of course, Sen. Harris does not become vice president, and thus president of the Senate, until Jan. 20, so there will be at least two weeks of massive uncertainty in the Senate after the new Congress convenes on Jan. 4. Both races likely have a slight lean Republican tilt, but for sake of argument, let’s assume the Democrats pull off the trifecta of closing the presidential race and winning both of the Georgia run-offs between Republican Sen. David Purdue and Democrat Jon Ossoff and Republican Sen. Kelly LoefflerKelly LoefflerLawsuit alleges 200K Georgia voters were wrongly purged from registration list Pro-Trump attorneys tell Georgians not to vote in runoff until votes are 'secure' List of Republicans breaking with Trump grows longer MORE and Democrat Raphael Warnock. How would a 50-50 Senate function?

It's hard to remember because it was brief but the Senate actually was a 50-50 institution for about four months in 2001. While this brief period of forced bipartisanship has been overlooked amid the bitter Bush-Gore election and eventual Supreme Court decision, the parties’ leaders, Republican Trent Lott (Miss.) and Democrat Tom Daschle (S.D.), actually negotiated a workable power-sharing agreement that led to a reasonably productive Senate early in 2001.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lott and Daschle agreed to make Senate committee rosters evenly divided and provided an even split in staff resources. With Vice President Cheney occupying the role Harris would fill in this scenario, Republicans technically retained the chairmanships and the ability to convene hearings and markups. And Majority Leader Lott retained the power to schedule the floor calendar, including the ability to proceed to legislation that had received a tie vote in a committee.

Much like the country, the Senate of 2001 was much less divided than what 2021 will look like. The 2001 Senate included at least 11 members who would either switch parties during their career (Sens. Ben Nighthorse Campbell (Colo.), Lincoln Chafee (R.I.), James Jeffords (Vt.), Arlen Specter (Pa.), Richard ShelbyRichard Craig ShelbyOvernight Defense: Defense bill moving forward despite Trump veto threat over tech fight | Government funding bill hits snag | Top general talks Afghanistan, Pentagon budget On The Money: Funding bill hits snag as shutdown deadline looms | Pelosi, Schumer endorse 8 billion plan as basis for stimulus talks | Poll: Most Americans support raising taxes on those making at least 0K Funding bill hits snag as shutdown deadline looms MORE (Ala.), Bob Smith (N.H.), and Strom Thurmond (S.C.)), work in the opposing party’s administration (Sen. Chuck Hagel (Neb.)), or campaign actively against their party’s presidential nominee (Sens. John McCainJohn Sidney McCainChoking — not cheating — was Trump's undoing Gabby Giffords congratulates Mark Kelly with throwback photo of her own swearing-in McConnell in tough position as House eyes earmark return MORE (Ariz.), Joe Lieberman (Conn.), and Zell Miller (Ga.)). And the roster included many more senators who routinely broke party lines including Sens. Max Baucus (Mont.), John Breaux (La.), Richard Lugar (Ind.), Olympia Snowe (Maine), Ted Stevens (Alaska), George Voinovich (Ohio) and John Warner (Va.).

During the four months of the 50-50 forced marriage, Republicans were able to work with Democrats to pass a major tax cut in the 2001 reconciliation bill, enact “No Child Left Behind,” move a Biden-led bankruptcy bill (despite protests by then-law professor Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenDespite veto threat, Congress presses ahead on defense bill Overnight Defense: Defense bill moving forward despite Trump veto threat over tech fight | Government funding bill hits snag | Top general talks Afghanistan, Pentagon budget Katie Porter in heated exchange with Mnuchin: 'You're play-acting to be a lawyer' MORE) and confirm notable appointments like Attorney General John Ashcroft and Solicitor General Ted Olson. In addition, Daschle and McCain were able to essentially take over the floor to move the McCain-Feingold campaign finance bill to final passage.

Should this scenario unfold, Sen. Charles SchumerChuck SchumerPelosi, Schumer endorse 8 billion plan as basis for stimulus talks Funding bill hits snag as shutdown deadline looms Trump supporters could hand Senate control to Democrats MORE (D-N.Y.) will no doubt be under tremendous pressure to jam the Republicans and give no ground on the Democrats’ procedural rights. But unless he can get all of his colleagues on board with a scorched-earth play, Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellHillicon Valley: GOP chairman says defense bill leaves out Section 230 repeal | Senate panel advances FCC nominee | Krebs says threats to election officials 'undermining democracy' On The Money: Funding bill hits snag as shutdown deadline looms | Pelosi, Schumer endorse 8 billion plan as basis for stimulus talks | Poll: Most Americans support raising taxes on those making at least 0K Nearly one-third of US adults expect to lose employment income: Census Bureau MORE (R-Ky.) has a strong argument to bring the 2001 agreement back to life as a template for how a 2021 50-50 Senate should operate. In particular, McConnell will need to dig in on several additional procedural issues:

  • Obtain a commitment from Schumer not to change the Senate’s rules regarding the legislative filibuster. After the erosion of the filibuster for nominations, first by Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry Mason ReidFeinstein departure from top post sets stage for Judiciary fight Whitehouse says Democratic caucus will decide future of Judiciary Committee Bottom line MORE (D-Nev.) and then by McConnell, using the fig leaf of 50-50 ‘majority’ to end minority rights should be off the table.
  • The minority leader will always have an opportunity to offer amendments to bills before the majority leader ‘fills the tree’ to block amendments.
  • The 50-50 deal remains in place until one party captures a 51st vote. Obtaining a temporary majority by a vacancy due to death, disability or resignation should not be grounds to revisit the power-sharing agreement. Only once the vacant seat is filled by an appointment or special election should either party be allowed to return to the normal majority-minority tradition of the Senate.

The Trump era has seen an unproductive explosion of partisanship and procedural gamesmanship. If Georgia voters create an evenly-divided Senate, our leaders can help move into a post-Trump era by structuring a Senate that requires compromise and encourages bipartisanship. The concept of power-sharing may seem quaint but it will be necessary.

C. Stewart Verdery, Jr., is CEO of Monument Advocacy, a public policy and strategic communications firm. He served as General Counsel to U.S. Senate Assistant Majority Leader Don Nickles (R-Okla.) from 1998-2002.