Growing up on the mean streets of East Los Angeles, I, like many of my childhood friends, feared the police more than the local gang, Big Hazard. Specifically, we dreaded Latino police officers, since they had a reputation of being more brutal than their white peers with us—poor Chicano kids from the projects. By verbally and physically harassing us, the Latino officers reinforced their 100 percent loyalty to their white peers and police department. Similarly, just like in my old barrio, in the Republican presidential-nomination battle, we can clearly see how the two Latino candidates, Sens. Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioRepublicans would need a promotion to be 'paper tigers' Defense & National Security — Military starts giving guidance on COVID-19 vaccine refusals Blinken pressed to fill empty post overseeing 'Havana syndrome' MORE (Fla.) and Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzOvernight Health Care — Presented by Carequest — Colin Powell's death highlights risks for immunocompromised The Senate confirmation process is broken — Senate Democrats can fix it Australian politician on Cruz, vaccines: 'We don't need your lectures, thanks mate' MORE (Texas), go the extra mile to demonstrate their loyalty to their white peers and mostly white electorate with their anti-Latino immigrant agendas.
Hence, instead of glowing in an important historical moment, where two Latino leaders represent viable candidates for the highest office in the United States, Rubio and Cruz have engaged in a vitriolic debate over their disdain towards undocumented immigrants—the vast majority being Latino. The ongoing duel between the senators regarding who supports amnesty or a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, as if it’s a sin to do so, represents a low point for both campaigns. Speaking of low points, on the last Republican debate, the senators tussled over the Spanish language. When Cruz questioned Rubio’s conservative credentials for supporting President ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaOvernight Defense & National Security — Presented by Raytheon Technologies — Nation mourns Colin Powell The Memo: Powell ended up on losing side of GOP fight Powell death leads to bipartisan outpouring of grief MORE’s immigration executive orders in Spanish on Univision, Rubio, as usual, refused to acknowledge any sympathies for those who live and work in the shadows.
Apart from demonstrating their anti-Latino immigrant credentials, it’s difficult to differentiate the two Latino Republican candidates with real estate mogul Donald TrumpDonald TrumpTrump goes after Cassidy after saying he wouldn't support him for president in 2024 Jan. 6 panel lays out criminal contempt case against Bannon Hillicon Valley — Presented by Xerox — Agencies sound alarm over ransomware targeting agriculture groups MORE and his racist positions on immigration. This includes the mass deportation of Mexican immigrants—like in the case of “Operation Wetback” of the mid-1950s—to the construction of a huge wall—that Mexico will miraculously pay for—to the ban of all Muslims to this country. While both Gov. John Kasich (Ohio) and former Gov. Jeb Bush (Fla.) have expressed their discontent with Trump’s xenophobic language and tone against immigrants, the only Latino candidates don’t seem perturbed at all.
Given their anti-Latino immigrant agendas and lack of sympathy for the plight of immigrants, if either Rubio or Cruz manage to become the Republican nominee, how will the winner regain the trust and confidence of Latinos, as the largest ethnic minority in the country? Given that Latinos represent over 55 million residents in the U.S. with a growing voting population, when the Republican and Democrat nominees compete for the White House, Latinos, as a key voting bloc, will remember their friends and foes. In survey after survey, Latino Decisions, the leading Latino political opinion group, has found that Latinos favor immigration as an important election issue.
This is a hard lesson that then-Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney learned in the 2012 with his “self-deport” position towards undocumented immigrants. By taking such an extreme position against immigrants, Latinos voted by a 3 to 1 margin for Barack Obama. Apparently, Romney didn’t learn from the disastrous case of then-California Gov. Pete Wilson (R) when he supported a Proposition 187, with its draconian measures against undocumented immigrants. Not only did Wilson galvanize the Latino vote, he also ensured the demise of the Republican Party at a statewide level.
In addition to Latino voters, Asian Americans, as the nation’s fastest growing ethnic group, also find immigration to be an important issue. Like Latinos, Asian Americans voted by a 3 to 1 margin for Obama. Once you add the African Americans, a loyal Democratic voting bloc, Democrats will secure the majority of ethnic minorities in this country, making it impossible for either a Rubio or Cruz Republican nominee to prevail in the 2016 Presidential Election.
Thus, in the words of the last California Republican governor and Hollywood action hero, Arnold Schwarzenegger, I have four words—three of them in Spanish—for the presidential campaigns of Rubio and Cruz: Hasta la vista, baby!
Huerta is an assistant professor of Urban & Regional Planning and Ethnic & Women’s Studies at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. He is the author of “Reframing the Latino Immigration Debate: Towards a Humanistic Paradigm,” by San Diego State University Press (2013).