House passes landmark bill to overhaul sexual harassment policy on Capitol Hill
© Greg Nash

The House passed landmark legislation on Tuesday to overhaul Capitol Hill's sexual harassment policies following a string of recent revelations that multiple lawmakers engaged in misconduct.

Passage of the bill by a voice vote means it now heads to the Senate, where its future is uncertain but could be helped by momentum from the "Me Too" movement highlighting sexual harassment.

The legislation seeks to streamline the process available to Capitol Hill staffers to report harassment, provide additional resources for people filing complaints and establish transparency requirements for taxpayer-funded settlements to resolve cases.


“Thanks to the ‘Me Too’ movement, the American public has made it clear that they have had enough. They expect Congress to lead and for once, we are,” said Rep. Jackie SpeierKaren (Jackie) Lorraine Jacqueline SpeierOvernight Defense: Senate breaks with Trump on Yemen war | Shanahan hit with ethics complaint over Boeing ties | Pentagon rolls out order to implement transgender ban | Dem chair throws cold water on Space Force budget Hillicon Valley: US threatens to hold intel from Germany over Huawei | GOP senator targets FTC over privacy | Bipartisan bill would beef up 'internet of things' security | Privacy groups seize on suspended NSA program | Tesla makes U-turn Shuttering of NSA surveillance program emboldens privacy groups MORE (D-Calif.), an author of the legislation.

Rep. Bradley ByrneBradley Roberts ByrneRoy Moore says he's 'seriously considering' 2020 Senate bid Education scholarship proposal would open doors for parents, schoolchildren Public education advocate says charter schools aren't held to same standard as public schools MORE (R-Ala.), a former employment lawyer who co-authored the legislation, suggested that Congress should consider ways to improve workplace protections in the private sector.
“It’s time for us in Congress, now that we’ve gotten our act together, to turn a look outward and say, what’s going on in the rest of America? Are there things we can do to make things stronger?” Byrne said.
"I just hope they will look at it, pick it up, and let’s get this put into law,” Harper said.
Under the current system created by a 1995 law, staffers must go through months of mediation and counseling before they can formally file a complaint. The bill passed on Tuesday would ensure the mediation and counseling are no longer mandatory, as well as provide staffers with access to an advocate providing legal advice and representation.

Members of Congress accused of sexual harassment would be personally on the hook for any settlement payments. Any lawmaker who agrees to a settlement would have to reimburse taxpayers within 90 days and would be barred from using any office funds to pay the costs.

The Office of Compliance, which handles the workplace dispute reporting process, would be required to publish reports online every six months detailing the settlement amounts and the employing offices involved.

“Taxpayers should not bail members of Congress out for misconduct,” said Rep. Ron DeSantisRonald Dion DeSantisGillum launches voter-registration campaign Republicans need solutions on environment too Republicans up for reelection fear daylight with Trump MORE (R-Fla.), who had introduced a bill last year that would ban taxpayer-funded settlements for harassment cases against lawmakers.

According to statistics released by the House Administration Committee, close to $200,000 has been provided by a special fund operated by the Treasury Department in the last two decades to cover settlements related to sexual harassment.

Yet those funds do not count settlements paid out by lawmakers’ personal offices, which would no longer be allowed under the legislation. Reports by BuzzFeed and The New York Times found that at least two members of Congress agreed to settle complaints of sexual harassment from former aides that were paid from their taxpayer-funded office budgets.

Former Rep. John ConyersJohn James ConyersOvernight Health Care: Pelosi asks how to pay for single-payer | Liberal groups want Dems to go bigger on drug prices | Surprise medical bill legislation could come soon Key Dem chairman voices skepticism on 'Medicare for all' bill Democrats seek cosponsors for new 'Medicare for all' bill MORE Jr. (D-Mich.) resigned last year after BuzzFeed reported that a female former aide who accused him of sexual harassment received about $27,000 in installments from his office budget.

Similarly, Rep. Patrick Meehan (R-Pa.) decided not to run for reelection after The New York Times reported that his office paid out a settlement of an undisclosed amount to a former female aide who accused him of retaliating when she rebuffed his advances.

Speaker Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanFormer Dem candidate says he faced cultural barriers on the campaign trail because he is working-class Former House candidate and ex-ironworker says there is 'buyer's remorse' for Trump in Midwest Head of top hedge fund association to step down MORE (R-Wis.) removed Meehan from his post on the House Ethics Committee and urged him to pay back the cost of the settlement.

Another GOP lawmaker, Rep. Blake FarentholdRandolph (Blake) Blake FarentholdFemale Dems see double standard in Klobuchar accusations Lawmaker seeks to ban ex-members from lobbying until sexual harassment settlements repaid Former Texas lawmaker Blake Farenthold resigns from lobbying job MORE (R-Texas), has also come under scrutiny for an $84,000 settlement paid from the Treasury Department fund after a female former aide accused him of sexual harassment. Farenthold, who has since decided not to run for reelection, initially pledged to take out a personal loan to reimburse taxpayers.

But a spokeswoman confirmed to The Hill last month that at the advice of legal counsel, Farenthold is waiting to see what changes the House makes to Capitol Hill’s sexual harassment policies before repaying the cost of the settlement.

Lawmakers have moved the bill speedily through the House after introducing it less than three weeks ago.

So far the legislation has encountered little opposition. But government transparency advocates have criticized a provision that sidelines the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE), an independent watchdog, in reviewing workplace complaints filed through the Office of Compliance process.

Complaints would only be referred to the House Ethics Committee for review; the OCE would not be able to investigate on its own. A spokeswoman for the House Administration Committee said limiting investigations to the Ethics Committee would streamline the review process.

But critics warn that the provision takes away a layer of accountability, given that the OCE was created to ensure that members of the Ethics Committee would hold their colleagues to ethics standards.

"One can only hope that this is not a case of the camel’s nose slipping under the tent signaling further efforts to undermine OCE’s role, while limited, in upholding strong ethical standards in the House of Representatives," Issue One executive director Meredith McGehee said.

The OCE can investigate allegations against lawmakers but lacks subpoena or punishment power. It can make recommendations on whether to pursue a case further to the Ethics Committee, which then decides the next steps.

Reports produced by the OCE must be publicly released after a certain amount of time has passed unless the Ethics Committee opens its own probe. In that case, the OCE report would still be made public once the Ethics Committee's investigation concludes.

Tuesday marks the second time in the last year that lawmakers have tried to curtail the powers of the OCE.

At the start of the new session of Congress in January 2017, House Republicans tried to weaken the OCE by putting it under the oversight of the House Ethics Committee. GOP lawmakers reversed course following an intense public backlash.

The House also adopted a resolution that requires each employing office in the lower chamber to adopt anti-harassment and anti-discrimination policies, which will go into effect immediately without needing action by the Senate.

Updated at 6:26 p.m.