This week: Round 2 of House impeachment inquiry hearings
© Greg Nash

The House is gearing up for a second week of public impeachment hearings before lawmakers leave town for a weeklong Thanksgiving recess. 

The House Intelligence Committee is set to have three days of public hearings, with a total of eight witnesses expected to testify before the panel. 

On Tuesday morning, Lt. Col. Alexander VindmanAlexander VindmanPresident Trump's intelligence community security blanket Whistleblower's lawyer questions GOP senator's whistleblower protection caucus membership White House limits number of officials allowed to listen to Trump calls with foreign leaders: report MORE, the leading Ukraine expert on the White House National Security Council, and Jennifer Williams, an aide to Vice President Pence, are slated to appear before the committee. Former special envoy to Ukraine Kurt VolkerKurt VolkerGOP rejects effort to compel documents on delayed Ukraine aid GOP chairmen seek interview with Obama officials as part of Biden-Ukraine probe Push to investigate Bidens sets up potential for Senate turf war MORE and Timothy Morrison, a Ukraine and Russia expert on the National Security Council, are expected to appear later in the day. 

ADVERTISEMENT

On Wednesday, Gordon SondlandGordon SondlandSenate rejects subpoenaing Mulvaney to testify in impeachment trial The Memo: Day One shows conflicting narratives on impeachment GOP rejects effort to compel documents on delayed Ukraine aid MORE, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union; Laura Cooper, the deputy assistant secretary of Defense for Russian, Ukrainian and Eurasian affairs; and diplomat David Hale are scheduled to appear. 

And on Thursday, Fiona Hill, a former top National Security Council staffer who covered Europe and Russia, will testify. 

Much of the spotlight heading into the second round of hearings has focused on Sondland, a Trump donor whom the president has tried to distance himself from in recent days.

Morrison, during his closed-door deposition, said Sondland had met with a top Ukrainian representative on Sept. 1, when he relayed the message that the release of U.S. military aid to the besieged country hinged on Kyiv opening the investigations President TrumpDonald John TrumpMnuchin knocks Greta Thunberg's activism: Study economics and then 'come back' to us The Hill's Morning Report - House prosecutes Trump as 'lawless,' 'corrupt' What to watch for on Day 3 of Senate impeachment trial MORE sought. 

State Department official David Holmes testified over the weekend that he overheard a July phone conversation between Trump and Sondland in which the president sought an update on "the investigation" and Sondland delivered the news Trump wanted, according to the opening remarks obtained by The Hill.

"So, he’s gonna do the investigation?" Trump asked, according to Holmes's testimony.

ADVERTISEMENT

"He’s gonna do it," Sondland replied.

Sondland first emerged as a prime point of interest for lawmakers after he revised his closed-door testimony before it was released by the committee to say the president’s dealings with Ukraine likely amounted to a quid pro quo.

Trump and GOP lawmakers have lashed out at the impeachment inquiry, arguing that officials are largely relying on secondhand information and that Democrats have blocked some GOP witnesses.

Republicans have also blasted the process being conducted, with Rep. Lee ZeldinLee ZeldinRepublicans take aim at Nadler for saying GOP senators complicit in 'cover-up' The Hill's Morning Report - Trump trial begins with clash over rules White House appoints GOP House members to advise Trump's impeachment team MORE (R-N.Y.) arguing no public hearings should take place before the rest of the transcripts from the closed-door depositions are released. 

“There are a lot of people who worked in the Trump Administration who have very countering views to that and they've not been allowed to come forward. So it's nice that some people can say one thing about a thirdhand information phone call, there's something else that other people can counter that with, and they haven't been allowed to come forward,” House Minority Whip Steve ScaliseStephen (Steve) Joseph ScaliseThe Hill's Morning Report - Trump trial begins with clashes, concessions Cheney's decision not to run for Senate sparks Speaker chatter Trump welcomes LSU to the White House: 'Go Tigers' MORE (R-La.) said during an interview on Fox News on Sunday. 

Asked about public hearings during a meeting with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Trump replied, "Are you talking about the witch hunt?" 

"Is that what you mean? Is that what you’re talking about? I hear it’s a joke. I haven’t watched. I haven’t watched for one minute because I’ve been with the president, which is much more important, as far as I’m concerned," he added. 

Democratic leadership has opened the door to Trump testifying as part of the inquiry if he wanted to counter the constant string of news coming out of the House investigation. 

“The president could come right before the committee and talk, speak all the truth that he wants if he wants to take the oath of office, or he could do it in writing,” House Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiSekulow indicates White House not interested in motion to dismiss impeachment articles Overnight Health Care: Trump restores funding for Texas program that bars Planned Parenthood | Trump to attend March for Life | PhRMA spent record on 2019 lobbying Key House committee chairman to meet with Mnuchin on infrastructure next week MORE (D-Calif.) said during an interview with CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “He has every opportunity to present his case.”

Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerCollins walks impeachment tightrope 'Emotion' from Trump's legal team wins presidential plaudits Biden says he would not engage in witness swap in impeachment trial MORE (D-N.Y.) backed Pelosi up during a press conference in New York, saying that Trump and “those around him” should testify under oath. 

"When Donald Trump refuses to come to the committee, now that Speaker Pelosi has invited him, when he doesn’t let all the people around him come before the committee, you gotta to ask the question, what is he hiding? Why is he afraid to confront what these people have said?" he added. 

Democrats have floated holding a vote on the articles of impeachment before Christmas, after the initial target date of Thanksgiving slipped. That would set up a Senate trial to start at the end of December or early January. 

But Pelosi wouldn’t commit to wrapping up the House’s impeachment inquiry this year, raising the prospect that it could bleed into 2020. 

Asked on “Face the Nation” if the House’s inquiry would wrap by the end of the year, Pelosi responded: “I have no idea.” 

“It is self-evident that we have open hearings for the next week. I don't know if there are any beyond that ... and then when we come back, maybe a decision or maybe they have more hearings.”

Government funding

Lawmakers are expected to pass a short-term spending bill this week ahead of Thursday’s deadline to prevent the second shutdown of the year. 

The government is currently funded through Thursday, but congressional leadership has signed off on an additional continuing resolution (CR) through Dec. 20. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The short-term spending bill, which as of Sunday evening had not been released by appropriators, is expected to go through the House first, before being sent to the Senate ahead of Thursday’s deadline. 

Given the tight time frame, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellThe Hill's Morning Report - House prosecutes Trump as 'lawless,' 'corrupt' Tensions between McConnell and Schumer run high as trial gains momentum No. 2 GOP leader eyes Wednesday of next week for possible votes on witnesses MORE (R-Ky.) will need consent from every senator to let the spending bill skip over procedural hurdles. 

Eric Ueland, the White House director of legislative affairs, has said the administration would support the stopgap bill, as long as it doesn’t place new restrictions on Trump’s priorities. The bill is expected to be a “clean” CR, meaning it would only extend fiscal 2019 spending levels through Dec. 20. 

The vote on the CR comes after Pelosi, House Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Nita LoweyNita Sue LoweyMixed feelings on war power limits: Lawmakers and vet candidates US officials, world leaders arrive in Israel for World Holocaust Forum  House revives agenda after impeachment storm MORE (D-N.Y.), Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard ShelbyRichard Craig ShelbySenate fails to get deal to speed up fight over impeachment rules Roberts under pressure from both sides in witness fight GOP senator on Trump soliciting foreign interference: 'Those are just statements' MORE (R-Ala.) and Treasury Secretary Steven MnuchinSteven Terner MnuchinMnuchin knocks Greta Thunberg's activism: Study economics and then 'come back' to us Key House committee chairman to meet with Mnuchin on infrastructure next week The Hill's Morning Report - Trump trial begins with clashes, concessions MORE met late last week to discuss the larger fiscal 2020 bills. 

Though the 2020 fiscal year started on Oct. 1, the House and Senate have not worked out a final deal on any of the 12 fiscal 2020 appropriations bills. Lawmakers are currently divided over spending for Trump’s border wall as well as the top-line spending figures for each of the 12 bills, known as 302(b)s. 

Negotiators are hoping to have a deal on the top-line figures by Wednesday. If they’re successful, it would amount to a breakthrough after months of being deadlocked despite the two-year budget agreement. 

ADVERTISEMENT

In a sign of potential progress, Democrats made a new offer to Republicans last week 

"We're talking about the 302(b)s and we're talking about the allocations for all of the subcommittees," Lowey said after the meeting. 

Shelby, meanwhile, called it the “best meeting we've had in months."  

Workplace violence

The House is slated to take up legislation that would require the Department of Labor to “address workplace violence in the health care and social service sectors.”

The Workplace Violence Prevention for Health Care and Social Service Workers Act — introduced by Rep. Joe CourtneyJoseph (Joe) D. CourtneyHouse passes bill tackling workplace violence in health care, social services sectors This week: Round 2 of House impeachment inquiry hearings State dinner highlights the enduring importance of US-Australia alliance MORE (D-Conn.) — calls for the Labor Department to promote safety and health standards and employers in those sectors to develop plans to protect against and investigate instances of violence risks and hazards. It would also push for training and education to be available for workers and implement record keeping requirements. 

"This bipartisan bill directs the occupational safety and health administration to issue a standard requiring health care and social service employers to write and implement a workplace violence prevention plan to prevent and protect employees from violent incidents at work," House Majority Leader Steny HoyerSteny Hamilton HoyerThe Hill's Morning Report - Trump trial begins with clash over rules House revives agenda after impeachment storm House poised to hand impeachment articles to Senate MORE (D-Md.) said on the floor on Friday. 

Nominations

The Senate will take up a slate of nominations before lawmakers head out of town for the weeklong Thanksgiving recess. 

McConnell has teed up votes on three nominations: Robert Luck’s and Barbara Lagoa’s nominations to be judges on the 11th Circuit, as well as Adrian Zuckerman to be the U.S. ambassador to Romania.

The Senate is set to hold a procedural vote on Luck’s nomination on Monday evening.