75 ex-lawmakers back Iran nuclear deal
© Getty Images

Seventy-five former lawmakers are urging Congress to back the Iran deal ahead of next month's vote, calling it the "most viable means" to block Tehran from getting a nuclear weapon.

"We believe that the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action that the United States and our P5+1 partners negotiated with the government of Iran is the most viable means to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon and protect the security of the United States, Israel and other allies," they wrote in the letter, sent on Monday. "We are writing to you as former Members of Congress to urge your support of this historic agreement."


The former lawmakers, including Sens. Carl LevinCarl Milton LevinListen, learn and lead: Congressional newcomers should leave the extremist tactics at home House Democrats poised to set a dangerous precedent with president’s tax returns The Hill's 12:30 Report — Sponsored by Delta Air Lines — White House to 'temporarily reinstate' Acosta's press pass after judge issues order | Graham to take over Judiciary panel | Hand recount for Florida Senate race MORE (D-Mich.) and Richard Lugar (R-Ind.), suggest the Iran agreement announced in mid-July shuts down Iran's "pathways" to a nuclear bomb. They write that the deal also includes the ability to snapback sanctions if Iran violates a deal and increases inspections of Iran's facilities and the amount of time it takes to create a bomb.

They added that there is "no viable alternative" to the agreement and that Congress should back the deal and then use their "oversight role throughout the robust monitoring and evaluation of the implementation."

Levin's successor in the Senate, Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.), is still publicly undecided on the Iran nuclear deal.

Separately, Lugar added that "sticking with our international partners in a unified and systematic effort to ensure Iran's compliance with this agreement is the best opportunity we have to block an Iranian nuclear weapon, while avoiding a costly war and preventing additional countries in the region from seeking a nuclear arsenal."

Monday's letter is the latest example of former lawmakers weighing in on the political fight, as both opponents and supporters try to sway their former colleagues on the Iran nuclear deal.

Congress has until Sept. 17 to vote on the deal and until early October to override a potential veto from President Obama.

Obama will need 34 senators to back the deal and uphold a potential veto for the agreement to survive Congress.

Though Republicans have lined up against the deal, the president is close to securing a victory, with 31 senators backing the agreement, according to The Hill's whip list.

At least two additional Senate Democrats, Sens. Bob CaseyRobert (Bob) Patrick CaseyTrump officials take bold steps on Medicaid Overnight Health Care — Presented by PCMA — Trump health chief reveals talks with states on Medicaid block grants | New head of FDA faces tough test | Trump officials defends work requirements in court Trump health chief reveals talks with states on Medicaid block grants MORE (Pa.) and Chris CoonsChristopher (Chris) Andrew CoonsSenate Dem calls on Trump to apologize for attacks on McCain Sixteen years later, let's finally heed the call of the 9/11 Commission  Senate Dems introduce bill demanding report on Khashoggi killing MORE (Del.), are expected to announce their decisions this week.

The former lawmakers added in the letter that, as former members of Congress, they "appreciate the gravity of your decision."

"Supporting the agreement does not come without risks.  But these risks must be considered in the context of the grave risks that would be incurred if you were to reject it," they said. "These include the unraveling of international sanctions, the suspension of international inspections and an Iranian government that is unconstrained in developing its nuclear program. They also include the increased likelihood of a military confrontation."

Read ex-lawmakers' letter