Dem senator: House Intel chairman may have revealed classified info
© Greg Nash

A Democratic senator said Wednesday that House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) might have leaked classified information when telling reporters about incidentally collected information on members of President Trump's transition team.

"Rep. Nunes's statements would appear to be revealing classified information and that obviously would be a very serious concern," Sen. Ron WydenRonald (Ron) Lee WydenCongress needs to step up on crypto, or Biden might crush it Democrats face growing storm over IRS reporting provision Best shot at narrowing racial homeownership gap at risk, progressives say MORE (D-Ore.) told reporters about Nunes' press conference.

Wyden, who is a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, added that "with respect to the substance of the claim, I don't have any idea what he is talking about."


Nunes grabbed headlines when he told reporters earlier Wednesday that the U.S. intelligence community incidentally collected information on members of Trump's transition team and the information was "widely disseminated" in intelligence reports.

The GOP chairman told reporters that the information was "legally brought to him by sources who thought we should know it," but declined to provide further detail.

The California Republican also said he would brief the president on his findings, which Wyden quipped didn't meet the "textbook definition" of congressional oversight since lawmakers are investigating any potential contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia.

The House Intelligence chairman appeared to catch lawmakers off guard with his announcement.

Rep. Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffSchiff says holding Bannon in criminal contempt 'a way of getting people's attention' Schiff: McCarthy 'will do whatever Trump tells him' if GOP wins back House Jan. 6 panel to pursue criminal contempt referral for Bannon MORE (Calif.), the top Democrat on the committee, criticized Nunes for meeting privately with Trump at the White House on Wednesday while separately saying that "this information should have been shared with members of the committee, but it has not been."

Sen. Mark WarnerMark Robert WarnerThe root of Joe Biden's troubles Pressure grows for breakthrough in Biden agenda talks Fill the Eastern District of Virginia  MORE (D-Va.), Schiff's counterpart on the Senate Intelligence Committee, told reporters that he was going back to his office "to figure out what the heck is going on."

"You would think if that was the case there would be — unless he is divulging some kind of confidential information only he has — I have not been briefed on this yet," he added.

Warner noted that the Russia investigation was the "most serious" investigation he had been involved with, before spotting Sen. Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioRepublicans would need a promotion to be 'paper tigers' Defense & National Security — Military starts giving guidance on COVID-19 vaccine refusals Blinken pressed to fill empty post overseeing 'Havana syndrome' MORE (R-Fla.) and pivoting, joking to reporters: "I know Marco Rubio wouldn't have done it."

"You hear what Nunes did?" Warner asked Rubio, leading a pack of reporters across the Senate basement and over to the Florida Republican.

"Was that in the news or are you just making — are you just announcing something?" Rubio asked Warner after the Democratic senator described Nunes's comments to him.


When Warner assured him that he hadn't made it up, Rubio joked that "it's fake news, man," while winking at reporters.

Both GOP Sens. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamRepublicans' mantra should have been 'Stop the Spread' Senators preview bill to stop tech giants from prioritizing their own products Democrats fret as longshot candidates pull money, attention MORE (S.C.) and John McCainJohn Sidney McCainVirginia race looms as dark cloud over Biden's agenda  Sinema's no Manchin, no McCain and no maverick Progressives say go big and make life hard for GOP MORE (Ariz.) told reporters that they had only seen news headlines about Nunes's comments and wanted to look into it.

"If we're surveilling a foreign agent, which we should be doing if there's reason to believe they're a foreign agent, and there's incidental contact then that's not surveilling the Trump campaign," Graham said.

"I don't know what he's saying," Graham added. "I would like to know more about what he's saying, but incidental collection is not equivalent to government-directed surveillance of an American citizen."