Attorney General William BarrBill BarrHouse Judiciary to probe DOJ's seizure of data from lawmakers, journalists Judge temporarily blocks release of Trump obstruction memo Garland pledges review of DOJ policies amid controversy MORE will be back in the hot seat this week when he returns to Capitol Hill for a round of questioning over special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) MuellerSenate Democrats urge Garland not to fight court order to release Trump obstruction memo Why a special counsel is guaranteed if Biden chooses Yates, Cuomo or Jones as AG Barr taps attorney investigating Russia probe origins as special counsel MORE's report.

Barr is scheduled to testify in back-to-back hearings about Mueller's findings in his investigation into Russian meddling during the 2016 election, first before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday and then before the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday.

In a potential curveball, Barr warned Democrats over the weekend that he might not appear as scheduled for the House testimony and that they need to change the proposed format for the hearing.

ADVERTISEMENT

A Department of Justice spokesperson said in a statement that "members of Congress should be the ones doing the questioning."

“The Attorney General agreed to appear before Congress. Therefore, Members of Congress should be the ones doing the questioning. He remains happy to engage with Members on their questions regarding the Mueller report," said spokesperson Kerri Kupec.

Rep. Jerrold NadlerJerrold (Jerry) Lewis NadlerHouse Judiciary to probe DOJ's seizure of data from lawmakers, journalists Outrage grows as Justice seeks to contain subpoena fallout Iowa man sentenced for threatening Rep. Jerry Nadler MORE (D-N.Y.), the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, had proposed a round that would allow for each side to question Barr for 30 minutes, a source said, in addition to giving members five minutes each. That round of questioning also would allow the committee counsels for both parties to question Barr.

Barr is expected to be grilled over the redacted version of Mueller’s sprawling 448-page report, which he released roughly three weeks after summarizing the special counsel’s principal conclusions in a four-page letter to Congress.

Democrats have relentlessly criticized Barr for painting what they see as a biased portrait of Mueller’s findings and are demanding that he provide Mueller’s full report and underlying evidence to Congress. Nadler has issued a subpoena for those documents, demanding the Justice Department comply by May 1 — one day before his scheduled testimony.

Mueller did not establish that members of President TrumpDonald TrumpDOJ asks Supreme Court to revive Boston Marathon bomber death sentence, in break with Biden vow Biden looking to build momentum for Putin meeting DOJ tells media execs that reporters were not targets of investigations MORE’s campaign conspired with the Russian government during the 2016 election, though he noted that members of the campaign believed they would benefit from Moscow’s meddling. The special counsel also did not come to a conclusion on potential obstruction of justice, instead analyzing nearly a dozen instances of possible obstruction by Trump and explicitly states that it does not “exonerate” the president.

One of the “episodes” explored by Mueller includes Trump telling then-White House counsel Don McGahn to fire Mueller. Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamSenate confirms Garland's successor to appeals court Progressives want to tighten screws beyond Manchin and Sinema GOP senators applaud Biden for global vaccine donation plans MORE (R-S.C.), the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, told CBS News on Sunday that he didn’t care about the conversation between Trump and McGahn.

"I don’t care what happened between him and Don McGahn," Graham said. "Here’s what I care about: Was Mueller allowed to do his job? And the answer is yes."

Instead, Republicans are likely to use the hearings this week to dig in on their concerns about the FBI’s actions during the 2016 campaign as they prepare to “investigate the investigators."

Barr sparked a political firestorm when he told lawmakers during budget hearings earlier this month that he believed "spying did occur" against Trump's campaign during the 2016 election.

"I think spying did occur. The question is whether it was predicated, adequately predicated,” Barr said.

Pressed later on his comments, he added that he was "not saying improper surveillance occurred. I am saying I am concerned about it, and I am looking into it."

Yemen

The Senate is set to take up Trump's veto of legislation cutting off U.S. support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen this week, though any override attempt is expected to fall short.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellBipartisan infrastructure deal takes fire from left and right Jayapal to Dems: Ditch bipartisanship, go it alone on infrastructure The Hill's 12:30 Report: Sights and sounds from Biden's European trip MORE’s (R-Ky.) office said late last week that the chamber would "process the president’s veto message on the Yemen resolution by the end of the week."

Trump vetoed the measure earlier this month, the second veto of his presidency. The resolution requires him to withdraw any U.S. troops in or "affecting" Yemen within 30 days unless they are fighting al Qaeda.

Neither the Senate nor the House is expected to have the votes to overcome Trump's veto.

McConnell's office did not specify what action the Senate would be taking to "process" the veto message. Overriding Trump's veto would require 67 votes in the Senate.  

Medicare for All

The House Rules Committee is slated to hold its first-ever hearing on a "Medicare for All" bill spearheaded by Reps. Pramila JayapalPramila JayapalJayapal to Dems: Ditch bipartisanship, go it alone on infrastructure New Alzheimer's drug sparks backlash over FDA, pricing Hillicon Valley: House targets tech giants with antitrust bills | Oversight chair presses JBS over payment to hackers | Trump spokesman to join tech company | YouTube suspends GOP senator MORE (D-Wash.) and Debbie DingellDeborah (Debbie) Ann DingellRecovering America through the lens of wildlife Shakespeare gets a congressional hearing in this year's 'Will on the Hill' OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Biden suspends Arctic oil leases issued under Trump |  Experts warn US needs to better prepare for hurricane season | Progressives set sights on Civilian Climate Corps MORE (D-Mich.) on Tuesday.

The legislation has garnered more than 100 Democratic co-sponsors in the lower chamber.

"It's a serious proposal that deserves serious consideration on Capitol Hill as we work toward universal coverage," Rules Chairman Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) said in a statement upon the hearing’s announcement.

Republicans — who have widely used the proposal while attacking Democrats for moving further to the left — were quick to note the hearing is being held by a panel that does not primarily have jurisdiction over health care.

“Using the Rules Committee as the first forum to consider Medicare For All, legislation that would force over 150 million Americans off of health care plans they enjoy, indicates a lot about the Democratic agenda. And that agenda continues to become more extreme and concerning by the day,” ranking member Tom ColeThomas (Tom) Jeffrey ColeNow that earmarks are back, it's time to ban 'poison pill' riders Parade of 2024 GOP hopefuls court House conservatives Florida Rep. Alcee Hastings dies at 84 MORE (R-Okla.) said in a statement.

“While Republicans welcome discussion on solutions for ensuring access to quality and affordable care, a government takeover of the nation’s health system is not the answer. During next week’s hearing, we will surely have a spirited debate about the real consequences and costs of government-run healthcare.”

The House Budget Committee is also expected to hold a hearing on Medicare for All in the coming weeks.

Climate action

House Majority Leader Steny HoyerSteny Hamilton HoyerThis week: Democrats face fractures in spending fight Pelosi signals no further action against Omar Overnight Energy: EPA to reconsider Trump decision not to tighten soot standards | Interior proposes withdrawal of Trump rule that would allow drillers to pay less | EPA reverses Trump guidance it said weakened 'forever chemicals' regulations MORE (D-Md.) announced the lower chamber will bring a bill to the floor aimed at affirming “the principles of the Paris Climate Agreement.”

The vote’s announcement comes in the wake of Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States from the agreement.

"Today’s legislation sends a message loud and clear to the president and the entire world — we are not backing down. The Climate Action Now Act keeps the United States in the Paris climate accord, renewing our country’s pledge to address climate change head on,” Rep. Eliot EngelEliot Lance EngelDemocrats call on Blinken to set new sexual misconduct policies at State Department Lawmakers on hot mic joke 'aisle hog' Engel absent from Biden address: 'He'd wait all day' Bowman to deliver progressive response to Biden's speech to Congress MORE (D-N.Y.) said following the bill’s introduction.

Republicans have alleged Democrats rammed the bill through committee, blasting them for opting not to hold a subcommittee hearing on the legislation.   

“It’s unfortunate your subcommittee missed out on an opportunity to mark up that measure. That would be the regular order that you’re proud of and that I’m proud of,” Energy and Commerce ranking member Greg WaldenGregory (Greg) Paul WaldenLobbying world Give Republicans the climate credit they deserve Fox hires former GOP lawmaker Greg Walden as political consultant MORE (Ore.) said at a hearing earlier this month. “Instead it’s going to be taken straight to full committee and straight to the floor to meet some arbitrary deadline.”

The Climate Action Now Act — spearheaded by Rep. Kathy CastorKatherine (Kathy) Anne CastorOnline school raises new concerns about cyberbullying Democrats ask Facebook to abandon 'Instagram for kids' plans Hillicon Valley: Tech companies duke it out at Senate hearing | Seven House Republicans vow to reject donations from Big Tech MORE (D-Fla.) — is expected to pass the House along party lines. The Rules Committee is scheduled to meet on the bill on Monday night, setting it up to be voted on by the full House by the end of the week.

Yucca

The Senate is prepared to revive a fight over storing nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain.

The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee is scheduled to hold a hearing Wednesday on legislation that would jump-start the process for building a permanent nuclear repository, which has been stalemated for years.

“My draft legislation takes commonsense steps to advance the licensing of the Yucca Mountain facility. The legislation also strengthens the nation’s nuclear waste management program,” Sen. John BarrassoJohn Anthony BarrassoBiden land management pick faces GOP scrutiny over decades-old tree spiking case Senate passes long-delayed China bill OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Biden ends infrastructure talks with key Republican | Colonial Pipeline CEO grilled over ransomware attack | Texas gov signs bills to improve power grid after winter storm MORE (R-Wyo.), the committee chairman, said in a statement last week.

The legislation is getting pushback from Nevada’s senators, who are both Democrats. House Republicans passed a bill in 2019 that would have moved forward a process toward building the Yucca Mountain facility. But with GOP Sen. Dean HellerDean Arthur Heller9 Senate seats most likely to flip in 2022 On The Trail: Democrats plan to hammer Trump on Social Security, Medicare Lobbying World MORE (Nev.) fighting for his political life the bill went nowhere in the Senate; Heller lost his reelection bid.

“Nevadans have spoken: We don’t want nuclear waste dumped in our backyards. Congress must respect our will and ensure states have a voice when the federal government tries to store nuclear waste within their borders,” Sens. Catherine Cortez MastoCatherine Marie Cortez MastoInfighting grips Nevada Democrats ahead of midterms Top union unveils national town hall strategy to push Biden's jobs plan 9 Senate seats most likely to flip in 2022 MORE (D-Nev.) and Jacky RosenJacklyn (Jacky) Sheryl RosenSenate passes resolution condemning recent rise in antisemitic attacks Progressives want to tighten screws beyond Manchin and Sinema Infighting grips Nevada Democrats ahead of midterms MORE (D-Nev.) said in a joint statement.

They’ve introduced alternative legislation that would require the state and local governments to sign off before money can be spent to build a nuclear storage facility.

DHS

Acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan will testify on Capitol Hill this week about the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) 2020 budget request amid a shake-up of top leadership.

McAleenan will testify before a House Appropriations subcommittee on Tuesday, before crossing the Capitol and appearing before a Senate panel on Thursday.

His testimony on Capitol Hill comes after The New York Times reported that acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney warned former Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen not to brief Trump on possible interference in the upcoming election, despite her concerns that it was a key national security issue.

Mulvaney, according to the Times, said it “wasn’t a great subject and should be kept below [the president's] level."

Nielsen was one of several members of DHS leadership who have left, or whose nominations were pulled, during the past month, setting off alarm bells on Capitol Hill over a potential lurch further rightward on the administration’s border and immigration policy.

The House Homeland Security Committee is expected to hold a separate hearing on Wednesday entitled “Trouble at the Top: Are Vacancies at the Department of Homeland Security Undermining the Mission?”

Nominations

Republicans are preparing to confirm another slate of Trump nominees after McConnell teed up several nominations before the two-week recess for votes on the Senate floor.

The Senate will hold its first vote of the week on Monday evening, where they’ll move to end debate on Clarke Cooper’s State Department nomination.

After they confirm Cooper to be an assistant secretary of State, senators will then work through six additional nominations: Gordon Hartogensis’s nomination to be the director of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, as well as district judge nominations for Campbell Barker, Andrew Brasher, Rodolfo Ruiz, Raul Arias-Marxuach and Joshua Wolson.

Each of the nominees only needs a simple majority to be confirmed. Under a rules change enacted earlier this month, they’ll only need two hours of debate after they defeat a filibuster, compared to the previously required 30.