OPINION | Hey Dems, Russia won't define 2018, so why not fix your party's problems instead?
© Getty

Amid all the Beltway noise, you may have missed the fact that Donald Trump is still more popular than Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonHillary Clinton: FBI investigation into Kavanaugh could be done quickly Hillary Clinton urges Americans to 'check and reject' Trump's 'authoritarian tendencies' by voting in midterms EXCLUSIVE: Trump says exposing ‘corrupt’ FBI probe could be ‘crowning achievement’ of presidency MORE. So much for #resist.

Talk to Democrats in D.C. these days and chances are good they will be fixated on Russia. They won’t be talking about their economic message, their path back to power, or their solution on what to do about a failing healthcare system.

But the Russia matter is in the capable hands of Robert Mueller, with whom with the Trump administration is cooperating. Even former Obama speechwriter, Jon Favreau, implored Democrats to turn their attention to policy matters, tweeting, “Reminder: unless you’re a journalist or Bob Mueller, you have a better chance of influencing the [healthcare] vote than Russia-gate.”

ADVERTISEMENT
More importantly, Hillary Clinton didn’t lose last year because of Russia. She lost because she was a terrible candidate with no economic message who was distrusted by the American people. Former Obama strategist David Axelrod posited, “One of the things that hindered her in the campaign was a sense that she never fully was willing to take responsibility for her mistakes, particularly that server.” Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Ann WarrenOn The Money: Senate approves 4B spending bill | China imposes new tariffs on billion in US goods | Ross downplays new tariffs: 'Nobody's going to actually notice' Overnight Health Care: Senators target surprise medical bills | Group looks to allow Medicaid funds for substance abuse programs | FDA launches anti-vaping campaign for teens Warren joins Sanders in support of striking McDonald's workers MORE (D-Mass.), with an eye on 2020, said that Democrats lost because they “didn’t make the case.”

 

The Democrats lacked a winning message in 2016, and still do today. But as a practical consequence, the Russia talk obscures their challenges. Still, when put on the spot, Democrats reveal just how bleak their outlook is. Take House Democratic Caucus Chairman Joseph Crowley (D-N.Y.), for example, who admitted in an interview this week that his party’s core message is “being worked on.”

The Democrats’ messaging woes aren’t the only thing that might have escaped your notice recently. It’s also the strong-arming campaign to define what that message will be. The party’s de facto leader, socialist Bernie SandersBernard (Bernie) SandersWarren joins Sanders in support of striking McDonald's workers Kavanaugh allegations could be monster storm brewing for midterm elections      Senate approves 4B spending bill MORE (I-Vt.), has been driving down ballot Democrats far to the left.

On healthcare, Democrats such as Sens. Warren, Kirsten GillibrandKirsten Elizabeth GillibrandEx-GOP donor urges support for Dems in midterms: 'Democracy is at stake' Overnight Energy: Warren bill would force companies to disclose climate impacts | Green group backs Gillum in Florida gov race | Feds to open refuge near former nuke site Former Virginia Gov. McAuliffe to visit Iowa, fueling 2020 speculation MORE (D-N.Y.), and rising star Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) are rushing to praise a single payer philosophy. Meanwhile, Democratic senators in red states are pledging to work with Republicans on more practical solutions.

On so-called “free” college, Sen. Sanders’ signature issue, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a 2020 hopeful, announced a Sanders-like program in the Empire State. On the minimum wage, the party has also lurched to the left. As a compromise to disenfranchised Sanders voters at the 2016 Democratic National Convention, the party included a $15 minimum wage provision in its platform.

This spring, minimum wage legislation backed by Senate Minority Leader Chuck SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerHouse Dems push to delay Kavanaugh vote for investigation Democrats should end their hypocrisy when it comes to Kavanaugh and the judiciary Celebrities back both Cuomo and Nixon as New Yorkers head to primary vote MORE (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) had more than 30 co-sponsors. In 2015, by contrast, similar legislation was only able to garner a half dozen Democratic legislators to support it.

What do these leaders get for adopting these radical views? It’s not just the blessing of Bernie Sanders. Big-moneyed, liberal groups like Democracy Now! and MoveOn.org are also sweetening the deal, offering dollars and grassroots support for adherents to their extreme ideology.

But the ties between Sen. Sanders and billionaire George Soros comes at a cost. These moves have the potential to be toxic to a party struggling to find its footing. Not only are the party’s far-left policies decidedly unpopular with voters (and particularly with midterm voters), but their path to victory is also bleak. Democrats have 10 Senate seats up in states won by President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump: I hope voters pay attention to Dem tactics amid Kavanaugh fight South Korea leader: North Korea agrees to take steps toward denuclearization Graham calls handling of Kavanaugh allegations 'a drive-by shooting' MORE — five of them by double digits.

By obsessing over last year’s election, the Democrats are missing an opportunity to focus on what’s next. Russia is not going to decide the 2018 midterms. Issues like healthcare, the economy and national security will. Without a leader and a message, the Democrats have a lot of work to do. The first step is recognizing this fact, but here we are, six months into the Trump presidency, and the Democratic Party remains stuck in a state of denial.

Alexandra Smith is executive director of America Rising, a political action committee dedicated to advancing conservative principles and holding liberals accountable. She previously served as chairman of the College Republican National Committee.


The views expressed by contributors are their own and are not the views of The Hill.