I should have realized, when our pilot warned of “moderate turbulence” as we flew into Halifax, Nova Scotia, for an international security conference, that our white-knuckle flight was only the beginning.

That was on Friday. On Saturday, a bipartisan delegation of U.S. senators flew into town, having been forced to spend the night in Bangor, Maine, because of the strong winds buffeting Halifax. Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamSenate braces for a nasty debt ceiling fight Bipartisan group says it's still on track after setback on Senate floor How Sen. Graham can help fix the labor shortage with commonsense immigration reform MORE (R-S.C.) marched into the first panel of the day and kicked up his own storm by urging President Obama to “neuter the regime” in Iran.

“If you take military action, you do open up Pandora’s box,” he said. “But if you let them get a weapon, you empty Pandora’s box.”

Graham did note that the international sanctions are beginning to work. But he said that Obama would have Republican backing if he made it “abundantly clear” that all options are on the table, including military action. "So my view of military force would be not to just neutralize their nuclear program, which are probably dispersed and hardened, but to sink their navy, destroy their air force and deliver a decisive blow to the Revolutionary Guard," he went on.

"In other words, neuter that regime."

This was strong stuff, and stunned the international participants at the forum, who wondered whether it was representative of mainstream thinking in Congress — particularly in light of last week’s elections. "No question there would be a negative reaction to that course of action,” said Canadian Defense Minister Peter MacKay, the host of the event.

Speaking on the same panel as Graham, Sen. Mark UdallMark Emery UdallKennedy apologizes for calling Haaland a 'whack job' OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Haaland courts moderates during tense confirmation hearing | GOP's Westerman looks to take on Democrats on climate change | White House urges passage of House public lands package Udalls: Haaland criticism motivated 'by something other than her record' MORE (D-Colo.) agreed that “all options” should be on the table, but was not prepared to voice support for military action at this point. Having flown in from Colorado for the panel event on Saturday, he then left to return home.

But here’s why I don’t believe Obama will be taking Graham’s advice. He’s just had a “shellacking” in the midterms, in which foreign policy did not figure at all. As one seasoned politician put it to me, he’s got to get his groove back. Beyond that, 2012 looms, and there is no way that Obama is going to launch another war only 14 months from the New Hampshire primaries.