Anti-abortion groups push for stronger 'pro-life' restrictions in ObamaCare funding bill

Anti-abortion groups push for stronger 'pro-life' restrictions in ObamaCare funding bill
© Getty

Anti-abortion groups are sounding the alarm over an ObamaCare funding bill, urging lawmakers to vote against it because they say it doesn't contain "pro-life" protections. 

A bill sponsored by Sens. Lamar AlexanderAndrew (Lamar) Lamar AlexanderDavis: The Hall of Shame for GOP senators who remain silent on Donald Trump Several GOP lawmakers express concern over Trump executive orders The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by the Air Line Pilots Association - Negotiators 'far apart' as talks yield little ahead of deadline MORE (R-Tenn.) and Patty MurrayPatricia (Patty) Lynn MurrayPelosi huddles with chairmen on surprise billing but deal elusive House approves two child care bills aimed at pandemic GOP, Democratic relief packages B apart on vaccine funding MORE (D-Wash.) would fund the key ObamaCare insurer payments called cost-sharing reductions (CSRs), which reimburse insurers for giving discounted deductibles and copays to low-income patients. 

But influential anti-abortion groups like the Susan B. Anthony List and National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) say the bill shouldn't be passed unless it is amended to stipulate that the funding can't go toward plans that cover abortion. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Such restrictions already exist in Medicaid and other programs under the Department of Health and Human Services through the Hyde Amendment, which bars the use of federal funds to pay for abortion, with some exceptions. 

"Any member voting for the Alexander-Murray proposal, or other ObamaCare stabilization legislation not covered by the Hyde amendment, would not only be voting to sustain what many have called the largest expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade, but would also be voting to directly appropriate taxpayer dollars for insurance that includes abortion," Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B. Anthony List, wrote in a letter to members of Congress this week. 

The Affordable Care Act says that CSRs can't be used for plans that cover abortions, but pro-life groups have long argued that the language isn't sufficient.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellOn The Money: Pelosi, Mnuchin talk but make no progress on ending stalemate | Trump grabs 'third rail' of politics with payroll tax pause | Trump uses racist tropes to pitch fair housing repeal to 'suburban housewife' Pelosi, Mnuchin talk but make no progress on ending stalemate Democrats say White House isn't budging in coronavirus relief stalemate MORE has said he supports passing the Alexander-Murray bill before the end of the year. He made the promise to Sen. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsProgressive Jewish group endorses Biden Poll: Gideon leads Collins by 8 points in Maine Senate race The Hill's 12:30 Report - Speculation over Biden's running mate announcement MORE (R-Maine), who asked for its passage in exchange for her vote on the GOP's tax bill. 

Collins has said she expects Alexander-Murray to be attached to the year-end spending deal.  

ADVERTISEMENT

But there's concern that the Senate will try to jam the House with the spending bill, and with it, the Alexander-Murray bill with no "pro-life" protections. 

That could pose a problem because Republicans are facing increased pressure from anti-abortion groups. 

"Simply put, it is a stone-cold non-starter without the Hyde language as all conservatives will feel pressure to oppose," said a House GOP Appropriations aide.

"Leadership might be able to peel off some opposition by adding the language." 

NRLC went a step further and said Hyde protections must be added to a reinsurance bill sponsored by Collins and Sen. Bill NelsonClarence (Bill) William Nelson Trump, facing trouble in Florida, goes all in NASA names DC headquarters after agency's first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson NASA, SpaceX and the private-public partnership that caused the flight of the Crew Dragon MORE (D-Fla.) 

ADVERTISEMENT

NRLC warns that votes for Alexander-Murray and Collins-Nelson, or any appropriations measure that contains the bills, will be included in its scorecard of key "right-to-life" votes of the 115th Congress. 

"We strongly urge Congress not to continue this unprotected appropriation of money to prop up plans that cover abortion," the group wrote in a letter to lawmakers. 

"NRLC respectfully urges you to vote to reject the Alexander-Murray and Collins-Nelson proposals unless they are amended to exclude payments to cover abortion on demand." 

The Family Research Council also said it would score against the spending deal if Alexander-Murray and Collins-Nelson weren't amended to include the funding restrictions. 

They note that a similar bill introduced earlier this year from Sen. Orrin HatchOrrin Grant HatchBottom line Senate GOP divided over whether they'd fill Supreme Court vacancy  Five takeaways as panel grills tech CEOs MORE (R-Utah) and Rep. Kevin BradyKevin Patrick BradyOn The Money: Five takeaways from the July jobs report Stimulus checks debate now focuses on size, eligibility Pelosi huddles with chairmen on surprise billing but deal elusive MORE (R-Texas) would fund the CSRs "while also providing Hyde-like pro-life protections that restrict these funds from being used to subsidize plans that cover elective abortion."