Anti-abortion groups push for stronger 'pro-life' restrictions in ObamaCare funding bill

Anti-abortion groups push for stronger 'pro-life' restrictions in ObamaCare funding bill
© Getty

Anti-abortion groups are sounding the alarm over an ObamaCare funding bill, urging lawmakers to vote against it because they say it doesn't contain "pro-life" protections. 

A bill sponsored by Sens. Lamar AlexanderAndrew (Lamar) Lamar AlexanderGrassley to test GOP on lowering drug prices McConnell blocks House bill to reopen government for second time Senators restart shutdown talks — and quickly hit roadblocks MORE (R-Tenn.) and Patty MurrayPatricia (Patty) Lynn MurraySen. Murray says Washington behavior reminds her of former preschool students Senate rejects government-wide ban on abortion funding Overnight Health Care: Dem chair plans hearing on Medicare for all | Senate GOP talks drug prices with Trump health chief | PhRMA CEO hopeful Trump reverses course on controversial pricing proposal MORE (D-Wash.) would fund the key ObamaCare insurer payments called cost-sharing reductions (CSRs), which reimburse insurers for giving discounted deductibles and copays to low-income patients. 

But influential anti-abortion groups like the Susan B. Anthony List and National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) say the bill shouldn't be passed unless it is amended to stipulate that the funding can't go toward plans that cover abortion. 

Such restrictions already exist in Medicaid and other programs under the Department of Health and Human Services through the Hyde Amendment, which bars the use of federal funds to pay for abortion, with some exceptions. 

"Any member voting for the Alexander-Murray proposal, or other ObamaCare stabilization legislation not covered by the Hyde amendment, would not only be voting to sustain what many have called the largest expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade, but would also be voting to directly appropriate taxpayer dollars for insurance that includes abortion," Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B. Anthony List, wrote in a letter to members of Congress this week. 

The Affordable Care Act says that CSRs can't be used for plans that cover abortions, but pro-life groups have long argued that the language isn't sufficient.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellBudowsky: Pelosi can break shutdown stalemate GOP seeks to change narrative in shutdown fight On The Money: Shutdown Day 32 | Senate to vote on dueling funding measures | GOP looks to change narrative | Dems press Trump on recalled workers | Kudlow predicts economy will 'snap back' after shutdown MORE has said he supports passing the Alexander-Murray bill before the end of the year. He made the promise to Sen. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsGOP seeks to change narrative in shutdown fight Trump pitches new plan to reopen government amid Dem pushback The Memo: Concern over shutdown grows in Trump World MORE (R-Maine), who asked for its passage in exchange for her vote on the GOP's tax bill. 

Collins has said she expects Alexander-Murray to be attached to the year-end spending deal.  

But there's concern that the Senate will try to jam the House with the spending bill, and with it, the Alexander-Murray bill with no "pro-life" protections. 

That could pose a problem because Republicans are facing increased pressure from anti-abortion groups. 

"Simply put, it is a stone-cold non-starter without the Hyde language as all conservatives will feel pressure to oppose," said a House GOP Appropriations aide.

"Leadership might be able to peel off some opposition by adding the language." 

NRLC went a step further and said Hyde protections must be added to a reinsurance bill sponsored by Collins and Sen. Bill NelsonClarence (Bill) William NelsonFlorida lawmaker diagnosed with pancreatic cancer Rick Scott threw party at Florida governor’s mansion after DeSantis and family had moved in: report Restoration of voting rights by felons marks shift in Florida MORE (D-Fla.) 

NRLC warns that votes for Alexander-Murray and Collins-Nelson, or any appropriations measure that contains the bills, will be included in its scorecard of key "right-to-life" votes of the 115th Congress. 

"We strongly urge Congress not to continue this unprotected appropriation of money to prop up plans that cover abortion," the group wrote in a letter to lawmakers. 

"NRLC respectfully urges you to vote to reject the Alexander-Murray and Collins-Nelson proposals unless they are amended to exclude payments to cover abortion on demand." 

The Family Research Council also said it would score against the spending deal if Alexander-Murray and Collins-Nelson weren't amended to include the funding restrictions. 

They note that a similar bill introduced earlier this year from Sen. Orrin HatchOrrin Grant HatchPhRMA CEO 'hopeful' Trump officials will back down on drug pricing move Live coverage: Trump AG pick grilled on Mueller probe at confirmation hearing Trump praises RNC chairwoman after she criticizes her uncle Mitt Romney MORE (R-Utah) and Rep. Kevin BradyKevin Patrick BradyTexas governor, top lawmakers tell Trump not to use hurricane relief funds to build border wall Trump on declaring national emergency: 'Not going to do it so fast' Dems look to chip away at Trump tax reform law MORE (R-Texas) would fund the CSRs "while also providing Hyde-like pro-life protections that restrict these funds from being used to subsidize plans that cover elective abortion."