Lawmakers push crackdown on foreign lobbyists

Lawmakers push crackdown on foreign lobbyists
© Stefani Reynolds

Lawmakers are seizing on momentum to crack down on unregistered foreign lobbying in the new Congress, after special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) Swan MuellerFox News legal analyst says Trump call with Ukraine leader could be 'more serious' than what Mueller 'dragged up' Lewandowski says Mueller report was 'very clear' in proving 'there was no obstruction,' despite having 'never' read it Fox's Cavuto roasts Trump over criticism of network MORE’s investigation put a spotlight on the issue.

Sen. Chuck GrassleyCharles (Chuck) Ernest GrassleyGOP braces for impeachment brawl PhRMA CEO warns Pelosi bill to lower drug prices would be 'devastating' for industry GOP requests update on criminal referrals prompted by 2018 Kavanaugh probe MORE (R-Iowa) is aiming to reintroduce legislation that would close loopholes in the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) that critics say allow lobbyists who work for foreign entities to conceal their work.

Grassley has made it clear that updating the decades-old law and toughening enforcement is a top concern, pressing President TrumpDonald John TrumpBusiness school deans call for lifting country-specific visa caps Bolton told ex-Trump aide to call White House lawyers about Ukraine pressure campaign: report Federal prosecutors in New York examining Giuliani business dealings with Ukraine: report MORE’s attorney general nominee, William Barr, on the matter during his confirmation hearing on Jan. 15.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Do you agree that the Foreign Agents Registration Act is a critical national security and public accountability tool, and if confirmed, will you commit to make sure that that act is a top priority?” Grassley asked.

Barr said he agreed.

Foreign lobbying has been in the national spotlight since Mueller obtained guilty pleas under the law from two prominent Trump 2016 campaign aides, Paul ManafortPaul John ManafortRand Paul calls for probe of Democrats over Ukraine letter He who must not be named: How Hunter Biden became a conversation-stopper Schiff should consider using RICO framework to organize impeachment MORE and Richard Gates, over their lobbying work on behalf of pro-Russian forces in Ukraine.

FARA dates back to the era of the Second World War, when the nation was worried about the influence of foreign propaganda. But decades later, lawmakers from both sides of the aisle find the law outdated, weak and filled with loopholes.

The law’s complexities often bring controversy. Recently, former Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) faced pressure from watchdog groups to register as a foreign lobbyist for the Chinese telecom firm ZTE. The company is under pressure from lawmakers and the administration over national security concerns because of its ties with the Chinese government. Amid pressure, Lieberman in January officially registered as a lobbyist for the company.

Lawmakers have tried to change the law in the past, especially since President Trump took office, but those efforts have fallen short.

Grassley introduced the Disclosing Foreign Influence Act in late 2017 with Rep. Mike JohnsonJames (Mike) Michael JohnsonHouse Democrat calls it 'unconstitutional' to cite God in hearing oaths Conservatives call on Pelosi to cancel August recess Nadler shuts down Republican point of order after impeachment question MORE (R-La.). Grassley said at the Barr hearing that he wants to try again to pass the bill, and Johnson said it would be reintroduced this Congress. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The bill would correct loopholes that lobbyists who work with foreign entities use to avoid disclosing their work through FARA. Currently, non-U.S. companies can register through the Lobbying Disclosure Act, which is the domestic lobbying law, if they are representing foreign entities that are not governments.

But disclosing through the Lobbying Disclosure Act instead of FARA allows companies to avoid sharing advisory services and public relations work.

The House Judiciary Committee passed the Grassley-Johnson bill in January 2018. It was introduced in the Senate and referred to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, where it stalled.

“We feel like it’s a great solution to the problem. It addresses the main deficiencies of FARA without going too far,” Johnson told The Hill. “It’s best tailored to really solve the problem [that] has been going on for decades ... [a] problem that is not going away anytime soon.”

The congressman said he thinks lawmakers and stakeholders across the political spectrum believe FARA needs a fix but there are outside forces pushing Congress to keep the status quo.

But some are calling for caution as lawmakers push to change the law. 

The Organization for International Investment, a trade association comprised of the U.S. subsidiaries of international companies, believes FARA reforms could complicate matters for their members. The group cited Nestle, a member based in Switzerland that has operations in the U.S.

“There should be a very bright line between somebody working for the Russian government versus Americans working for a Dutch grocery story or a Canadian auto parts company,” the organization’s president and CEO, Nancy McLernon, told The Hill.

“On the FARA issue, we’ve been working quite a bit with our companies going up to Capitol Hill and trying to educate on how these companies that are in their state and in their district are getting caught in the crosshairs,” McLernon added.

The organization is working on revising the law and tightening its requirements to ensure those representing foreign governments thoroughly disclose their activities, without hurting member businesses.

Lobbyists who work with foreign entities are insistent they follow the rules and wouldn’t fall into the trap that two D.C. firms that Manafort recruited to lobby on behalf of former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych in the United States did: the now-defunct Podesta Group and Mercury Public Affairs.

Neither firm registered under FARA for lobbying work but instead registered under the Lobbying Disclosure Act. 

“I think most of the big firms have very skilled ethics counsel so they would have been registered,” a lobbyist told The Hill. But the lobbyist acknowledged that “even the ones that were in-line with registration and FARA are going to have to reconsider it now.”

There will be no shortage of proposals for reforming FARA as lawmakers look to seize on momentum.

Sen. Michael BennetMichael Farrand Bennet2020 primary debate guide: Everything you need to know ahead of the October showdown The Hill's Campaign Report: Impeachment fight to take center stage at Dem debate 2020 Presidential Candidates MORE (D-Colo.) and Rep. John SarbanesJohn Peter Spyros SarbanesHouse to vote this month on legislation to combat foreign interference in elections Hillicon Valley: Zuckerberg to testify on Libra | Extremists find home on Telegram app | Warren blasts Facebook for not removing anti-Biden ad | California outlaws facial recognition in police body cameras | China rips US tech sanctions House Democrats introduce new legislation to combat foreign election interference MORE (D-Md.) had a bill last Congress, the Curtailing Lobbyists and Empowering Americans for a New Politics Act. It’s unclear if they will reintroduce it this Congress. 

The bill would change the 20 percent rule, which requires people to register as lobbyists only if they spend at least 20 percent of their time lobbying.

Sarbanes is the chairman of the Democracy Reform Task Force, which is behind Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiPelosi says Trump sanctions package on Turkey 'falls very short' Graham throws support behind Trump's Turkey sanctions Feehery: Trump may be down, but he's not out yet MORE’s (D-Calif.) House Resolution 1.

Among the many ethics reform measures H.R. 1 aims to implement are closing loopholes for lobbyists and foreign agents and ensuring watchdogs have resources to enforce the law.

Others have indicated they also intend to jump into the debate, some with even more draconian proposals.

Sen. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulRand Paul calls for probe of Democrats over Ukraine letter Sunday Show Preview: Trump's allies and administration defend decision on Syria Ana Navarro clashes with Rand Paul in fiery exchange: 'Don't mansplain!' MORE (R-Ky.) called lobbying for foreign governments “unseemly” in an interview with Fox News in December.

“I’m toying with the idea ... of whether or not we should just make a law that you can’t do lobbying for foreign governments because it really does appear to be divided loyalty whether you’re in government or not,” he said.

With Grassley taking a lead in the Senate and with Democrats also highlighting the issue as a priority under Pelosi, an effort to rein in the activity of foreign agents could have bipartisan legs.

Democrats got a road map for handling the issue from former President Obama.

Obama listed ending foreign lobbying as a “good new idea” during a speech in September at the University of Illinois.

“Democrats aren’t just running on good old ideas like requiring presidential candidates to release their tax returns and barring lobbyists from making campaign contributions, but on good new ideas like barring lobbyists from getting paid by foreign governments,” he said.

But it is unclear if that momentum will translate into floor action. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellFury over Trump Syria decision grows Overnight Defense — Presented by Boeing — Trump to slap sanctions on Turkey for Syria offensive | Trump calls on Turkey to broker ceasefire | Pelosi, Graham seek deal on sanctions | Ex-Trump aide testifies in impeachment probe Trump: Let Assad, Russia or China protect the Kurds MORE (R-Ky.) failed to address it as a top priority at the start of the new Congress.

Although it has broad bipartisan support, a bill to crack down on foreign lobbying may not see the Senate floor this year, with GOP leaders focused on other priorities.

“It’s one of the few issues in Washington that seemingly virtually everyone agrees,” Johnson told The Hill. “We just need to have the political courage.”