Dem lawmaker: GOP deliberately increased deficits through tax cuts in order to cut social programs

Rep. John YarmuthJohn Allen YarmuthBudget hawk warns 'Tax Cuts 2.0.' would balloon debt On The Money: Trump threatens 7B more in Chinese tariffs | Obama mocks GOP for taking credit for economy | US adds 201K jobs in strong August | Dems vow to get Trump's tax returns if they take the House Dems vow to grab Trump tax returns upon taking majority MORE, the highest-ranking Democrat on the House Budget Committee, accused Republicans Friday of deliberately inflating federal budget deficits through their tax cuts in order to increase public support for reductions to social safety net programs.

In an interview with "Rising," Hill.TV's morning news show, the Kentucky congressman said that his Republican rivals continually push for "deep tax cuts that benefit mostly the wealthiest Americans and corporations and then scream about the deficits that are being created."

The GOP then uses concern about deficits to "go after Medicare and Medicaid and programs that help middle Americans and struggling Americans," he asserted.

Yarmuth made his remarks in reference to the federal budget resolution that passed the budget committee on Thursday in a party-line vote.


"That's exactly what this budget does. Two trillion dollars worth of cuts to Medicare and Medicaid and other health programs," he said. "Funding levels for almost all the non-defense, discretionary part of the budget that go back 20 years."

Despite these spending reductions, Yarmuth said, the GOP budget will increase the national debt by $5 trillion over the next 10 years.

While charging that the GOP "always" followed this fiscal strategy, Yarmuth singled out Speaker Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanElection Countdown: Trump confident about midterms in Hill.TV interview | Kavanaugh controversy tests candidates | Sanders, Warren ponder if both can run | Super PACs spending big | Two states open general election voting Friday | Latest Senate polls On The Money: Midterms to shake up House finance panel | Chamber chief says US not in trade war | Mulvaney moving CFPB unit out of DC | Conservatives frustrated over big spending bills Nancy Pelosi: Will she remain the ‘Face of the Franchise’? MORE (R-Wis.) for particular blame.

"This really goes back to Paul Ryan when he was chairman of the budget committee. He put forth the Ryan budget, which, when he was running for vice president, Mitt RomneyWillard (Mitt) Mitt RomneyPoll: House GOP candidate leads in California swing district Super PACs spend big in high-stakes midterms Kavanaugh and the 'boys will be boys' sentiment is a poor excuse for bad behavior MORE had to disavow because it was so unpopular."

On Thursday, Rep. Steve WomackStephen (Steve) Allen WomackBudget chairs press appropriators on veterans spending Senate chairman urges move to two-year budgetary process On The Money: Senate passes first 2019 spending bill | Trump hits Harley-Davidson in tariffs fight | Mnuchin rips report of investment restrictions | Justices side with American Express in antitrust case MORE (R-Ark.), the committee's chairman, raised concern about the national debt in his opening statement for the two-day budget markup process.

"The largest looming shadow of doubt on America’s future is, quite simply, the extent of the nation’s debt," he said.

In his interview with Hill.TV, Yarmuth said that he wanted Republicans to focus on increasing federal revenues in addition to promoting spending reductions.

"The budget doesn't just have one side. That there is a revenue side and there's an expenditure side. The Republicans want to deal only with the spending side. And they never want to touch the revenue side except to reduce it."

According to Yarmuth, Republicans should consider eliminating or scaling back some federal tax deduction programs, including the home mortgage deduction, if they are serious about reducing the national debt. He also cited a 2013 report from the Congressional Budget Office which estimated that granting legal status to currently undocumented immigrants would increase federal revenues since many such workers do not pay income taxes in order to avoid contact with law enforcement.

—Matthew Sheffield