Ex-prosecutor praises Trump decision to waive executive privilege on Mueller report

Former federal prosecutor Gene Rossi on Thursday praised President TrumpDonald John TrumpMarine unit in Florida reportedly pushing to hold annual ball at Trump property Giuliani clashes with CNN's Cuomo, calls him a 'sellout' and the 'enemy' Giuliani says 'of course' he asked Ukraine to look into Biden seconds after denying it MORE's decision to waive executive privilege over special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) Swan MuellerLewandowski says Mueller report was 'very clear' in proving 'there was no obstruction,' despite having 'never' read it Fox's Cavuto roasts Trump over criticism of network Mueller report fades from political conversation MORE's findings.

"If Donald Trump waived executive privilege on the report, that's a big deal to me," Rossi told Hill.TV's Krystal Ball and Buck Sexton. 

"If I were the Trump people, [Rudy] Giuliani or Victoria [Toensing], they should pop the champagne because that's a big deal, executive privilege waived," he continued. "That really made me feel good."

Attorney General William BarrWilliam Pelham BarrDemocrats to seek ways to compel release of Trump whistleblower complaint Democrats press Nadler to hold Lewandowski in contempt The Hill's 12:30 Report: Questions swirl around Trump whistleblower complaint MORE confirmed in a press conference on Thursday that Trump declined to use executive privilege to keep portions of the report from Congress and the public after White House lawyers looked over a redacted version. 

Barr submitted Mueller's long-anticipated report to Congress on Thursday, making it available to the public. In the report, Mueller details the findings of his 22-month investigation, saying there was no evidence of collusion between Trump's campaign and Russian election meddling in 2016. Mueller also declined to take a position on whether Trump obstructed justice with the probe.

The report is redacted to hide grand jury material, classified information, details about ongoing investigations and information that could implicate the privacy of “peripheral” third parties.

— Julia Manchester