Saagar Enjeti laments use of identity politics in 2020 Democratic race

Opinion by: Saagar Enjeti

One of the most satisfying things about the 2020 presidential campaign is watching the identity politics obsessed elite wing of the Democratic party have their hopes dashed before their very eyes with the dying campaigns of Kamala HarrisKamala HarrisSenate GOP's campaign arm rakes in M as Georgia runoffs heat up Biden, Harris to sit with CNN's Tapper in first post-election joint interview The Hill's 12:30 Report — Presented by Capital One — Giuliani denies discussing preemptive pardon with Trump MORE, Cory BookerCory BookerBiden budget pick sparks battle with GOP Senate Policy center calls for new lawmakers to make diverse hires Dangerously fast slaughter speeds are putting animals, people at greater risk during COVID-19 crisis MORE, and I’m sure Deval PatrickDeval PatrickThe Hill's Morning Report - Presented by the UAE Embassy in Washington, DC - Calls mount to start transition as Biden readies Cabinet picks Merrick Garland on list to be Biden's attorney general: report Ralph Gants, chief justice of Massachusetts supreme court, dies at 65 MORE.

The New York Times, a work organization itself, couldn’t quite figure out exactly why black people weren’t voting based purely on racial identity lines like they would expect, so they sent a reporter to South Carolina and elsewhere to figure it out in a story titled: black voters to black candidates: representation is not enough.”

The Times interviewed two dozen black voters in Atlanta and across South Carolina where they found miraculously that black voters are just like everybody else, in that they vote for whichever candidate best represents their interests rather than somebody who just happens to look like them. The Times writes that “many articulated a particular disenchantment with the idea that racial representation equated to change, and that they should automatically back a candidate who looked like them.”

I was cracking up at this particular quote from a voter who told the Times, “If I had a Kamala Harris or a Cory Booker that sounded like Bernie SandersBernie SandersDeVos knocks free college push as 'socialist takeover of higher education' The Hill's 12:30 Report — Presented by Capital One — Giuliani denies discussing preemptive pardon with Trump Manchin: Ocasio-Cortez 'more active on Twitter than anything else' MORE of course I would choose them, because they’re closer to my lived experience. But the Kamala’s and the Corys aren’t discussing the issues he’s discussing.” This voter in particular expressed disappointment with Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaObama chief economist responds to McConnell quoting him on Senate floor: He missed 'a critical part' Amazon reports .8B in weekend sales from independent businesses on its platform Ossoff features Obama in TV ad ahead of in Georgia run-off MORE saying “we heard social justice talk, but he protected Wall Street, not mainstreet. And that I’m not falling for that again.”

The Times also observed of younger voters in particular that they have “embraced the idea that supporting a candidate who is willing to upend unjust systems is more important than choosing one from their community.” That in a sentence is the story of black voters in 2020, evangelical voters in 2016, and many more communities in an increasingly class divided world. The reason so many people in the media can’t understand that is because they belong to the elite class where everything is working out for them.

Poll after poll reveals to us that the people most likely to view politics through the frame of racial politics are not people of color themselves, but upper middle class white people who have passed through the elite university system. These are the people who populate our newsrooms, populate the professional managerial class, and have far too much of an impact on our contemporary political discourse and these are exactly the people who pushed the idea that a Deval Patrick, Kamala Harris, or Cory Booker was really what black voters want or need.

This is dangerous for everybody. Not only does it push a false racial politics narrative that people of color in this country don’t even want, but it allows for excuse making by bad politicians. Like this from Kamala Harris a few weeks ago when she blamed race and gender for why she is failing in the Democratic primary. Let’s take a listen:

Kamala Harris: Essentially is America ready for a woman and a woman of color to be President of the United States.
Axios Reporter: America was ready for a black man to be President of the United States. Kamala Harris: And this conversation happened for him. There is a lack of ability or difficulty in imagining that someone we have never seen can do a job that has been done 45 times by someone who is not that person.

This type of excuse making blames voters for accurately seeing that Kamala Harris is not offering either an electable case to the American public like Joe BidenJoe BidenTrump alludes to possible 2024 run in White House remarks Tiger King's attorney believes they're close to getting pardon from Trump Cruz urges Supreme Court to take up Pennsylvania election challenge MORE, or a transformational case for change like Bernie Sanders and to some extent, Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenOn The Money: McConnell offering new coronavirus relief bill | Biden introduces economic team, vows swift action on relief | Rare Mnuchin-Powell spat takes center stage at COVID-19 hearing Biden introduces economic team, vows swift action on struggling economy Louisville mayor declares racism a public health crisis MORE.

The polling results of today and the life support candidacies of Kamala Harris and Cory Booker are a great corrective to the identity politics obsessed political class that wonders how an AOC could endorse Bernie Sanders, how older black voters could support Joe Biden, or how younger black women could support an Elizabeth Warren. As the media found out in 2016, people vote for somebody who will best advocate for their interests. It just turns out that most people don’t view their interests in purely racial terms

And in a multi-ethnic, multi-racial, multi-religious democracy like ours, that is a profoundly comforting and optimistic development.