Political analyst: Trump's attorneys 'should be disbarred' if they allow him to talk to Mueller

If President TrumpDonald John TrumpComey responds to Trump with Mariah Carey gif: 'Why are you so obsessed with me?' Congress to get election security briefing next month amid Intel drama New York man accused of making death threats against Schumer, Schiff MORE’s attorneys allow him to testify in Department of Justice special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) Swan MuellerCNN's Toobin warns McCabe is in 'perilous condition' with emboldened Trump CNN anchor rips Trump over Stone while evoking Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting The Hill's 12:30 Report: New Hampshire fallout MORE’s investigation into Russian election interference they will be guilty of legal malpractice, veteran political journalist Carl M. Cannon said Friday.

“A lawyer who let Trump talk to Mueller should be disbarred. In fact, just turn in your license [to practice law], don’t even bother being disbarred,” Cannon said during a panel discussion Friday on Hill.TV's “What America’s Thinking.” 

According to Cannon, the Washington Bureau Chief of RealClearPolitics, the president would be walking into a “perjury trap” by talking to Mueller, given the frequency with which he makes false statements.

“Donald Trump is not going to be able to be as precise as a prosecutor would like,” Cannon told Hill.TV host Joe Concha in response to whether Trump’s attorneys would allow him to testify for Mueller's probe.

Cannon said many Democrats denounced former independent counsel Kenneth Starr for constructing a “perjury trap” for then-President Bill ClintonWilliam (Bill) Jefferson ClintonMeghan McCain after Gaetz says Trump should pardon Roger Stone: 'Oh come on' Enlightening the pardon power The Hill's Morning Report - Democrats duke it out during Nevada debate MORE in the 1990s. Clinton was later impeached by the House for making false statements to a grand jury assembled by Starr.

Trump's attorneys have been in close negotiations with Mueller for months over whether to grant an interview to the special counsel and what parameters are allowed to be put on their conversation.

Earlier this month, the president’s legal team sent a letter requesting that the investigation be concluded by Sept. 1.

The letter, first reported on by The New York Times, details eight months of negotiations between Trump layers and the special counsel over the terms of a possible interview.

According to The Washington Post, the letter allows for the possibility of Trump answering some questions in writing.

In response to the letter, an unnamed Trump adviser told The Washington Post, "If you don’t want to accuse someone of perjury, you don’t need to have them answer questions under oath."

On Wednesday, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said his team would fight a potential subpoena from the special counsel all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

According to the Washington Post’s “Fact Checker” blog, through Aug. 1, Trump has made over 4,200 false or misleading claims since his inauguration.