Lott on McConnell, Supreme Court: I probably would have handled it differently

Lott on McConnell, Supreme Court: I probably would have handled it differently
© Getty Images

Former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.) is suggesting that Republicans would have considered President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee if he still led the Senate.

In a new interview, Lott questions current Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellBitter fight over Barrett fuels calls to nix filibuster, expand court Trump blasts Obama speech for Biden as 'fake' after Obama hits Trump's tax payments White House hoping for COVID-19 relief deal 'within weeks': spokeswoman MORE’s (R-Ky.) pledge to block Obama’s pick in the Senate.


“I probably would've handled it differently,” Lott told former top Obama adviser David Axelrod in an episode of the “The Axe Files” podcast published Monday. 

“My attitude, particularly on the Supreme Court, was that elections do have consequences, sometimes bad, and I tried to lean towards being supportive of the president's nominees, Democrat or Republican,” added Lott. 

The Mississippi Republican, who led the Senate from 1996 to 2001, said he tended to support nominees who “were qualified by education, experience and demeanor and had no other side problem.”

Lott voted to confirm Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who was nominated by President Bill ClintonWilliam (Bill) Jefferson ClintonThe Hill's Campaign Report: Trump, Biden face off for last time on the debate stage Trump expected to bring Hunter Biden's former business partner to debate Davis: On eve of tonight's debate — we've seen this moment in history before MORE. But he voted against Clinton’s other nominee to the high court, Stephen Breyer. 

McConnell has come under withering criticism from Democrats for his handling of the vacancy left by the passing of Justice Antonin Scalia. 

The top Republican has promised not to hold hearings or votes for any nominee Obama puts forward, arguing it should be up to the next president to name Scalia’s successor. 

Obama and his Democratic allies have pointed to some Republicans, including Lott, who have second-guessed that approach. The president argues punting on a nomination would hurt the credibility of the court. 

While Democrats have painted McConnell’s stance as unreasonable, Lott said he understands the Kentucky Republican’s approach.

“The problem is in my opinion, and in the opinion of a lot of Republicans, and certainly in the opinion apparently of McConnell, so many of Obama's nominees have been so bad and so far left that the trust factor is not there,” he said. “Was it wise to jump out there the way the leader did? You know, time will tell."

“This is a very critical appointment,” he added. “This appointment could shift the balance of the Supreme Court from 5-4 one way to 5-4 the other way for years. And, you know, that is a problem.”

Lott said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck GrassleyCharles (Chuck) Ernest GrassleyBarrett confirmation stokes Democrats' fears over ObamaCare On The Money: Power players play chess match on COVID-19 aid | Pelosi bullish, Trump tempers optimism | Analysis: Nearly 1M have run out of jobless benefits Grassley: Voters should be skeptical of Biden's pledge to not raise middle class taxes MORE (R-Iowa) might be willing to go back on his promise not to hold hearings for Obama’s nominee once that person is named.

“If the president comes up with somebody that's credible and is a little bit more mainstream or moderate, I wouldn't be surprised to see Chuck give him a hearing,” he said.