The White House and Congress are gearing up for a fierce battle over President Trump’s pivotal nomination to the Supreme Court, which he is expected to announce Tuesday.
Sen. Jeff MerkleyJeff MerkleyDemocrats revive filibuster fight over voting rights bill Senate backers of new voting rights bill push for swift passage Stacey Abrams backs Senate Democrats' voting rights compromise MORE (D-Ore.) turned up the temperature on Monday, circulating a petition that argues his colleagues should block any nominee from Trump given the Senate GOP’s decision to not grant a vote or hearing to Merrick Garland, whom then-President Obama nominated to the court last year.
“This is the seat that [Senate Majority Leader] Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellCEOs urge Congress to raise debt limit or risk 'avoidable crisis' Capito grills EPA nominee on '#ResistCapitalism' tweet Hassan launches first ad of reelection bid focusing on veterans' issues MORE [R-Ky.] and [his] team have stolen from President Obama,” he said in an email to supporters. “I won’t be complicit in this theft.”
A spokeswoman for Merkley confirmed that the Oregon Democrat will block any nominee besides Garland, who is not on Trump’s list of potential picks, from winning Senate approval by a simple majority vote.
Trump has vowed to appoint a conservative jurist, and Senate Democratic Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerCEOs urge Congress to raise debt limit or risk 'avoidable crisis' If .5 trillion 'infrastructure' bill fails, it's bye-bye for an increasingly unpopular Biden The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by National Industries for the Blind - Schumer: Dem unity will happen eventually; Newsom prevails MORE (N.Y.) has threatened to block any nominee deemed outside the mainstream.
The pick will replace Antonin Scalia, the conservative justice who died in February 2016. Adding a conservative could give the right a working majority, though Justice Anthony Kennedy typically holds the court’s swing vote.
Only four filibusters have ever been launched against Supreme Court nominees, but the likelihood of a fifth is high given the tension surrounding the blocked Garland nomination.
Republicans hold 52 seats in the Senate. To defeat a filibuster, they would need eight Democrats to cross party lines.
The last filibuster against a Supreme Court nominee occurred when Democrats sought to block Samuel Alito’s nomination by President George W. Bush in 2006. It failed, and Alito was confirmed by a vote of 58-42.
Only one high court nominee, Abe Fortas, has been successfully filibustered. President Lyndon B. Johnson withdrew his nomination after the Senate voted against ending debate.
Merkley, one of his caucus’s most liberal senators and the only supporter in the Senate of Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersWarren, Daines introduce bill honoring 13 killed in Kabul attack trillion tax hike the opposite of 'good investment' Progressive groups call for Puerto Rico Fiscal Control Board to be abolished MORE’s (I-Vt.) presidential campaign last year, isn’t alone.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) is also pledging to use the Senate’s procedural hurdles to try to block Trump’s nominee if the individual is an “extremist.”
“I want to fill [an] open seat, but I will oppose — and will actively use every legal tool to block — an extremist, unqualified nominee,” said Blumenthal, a member of the Judiciary Committee.
Republicans are returning fire, arguing Democrats are ignoring the will of voters who handed Republicans their first unified government in roughly a decade.
“I think if you’re a Senate Democrat, you’ve got to wonder whether or not you’re getting outside of Washington enough,” White House press secretary Sean Spicer told reporters Monday.
McConnell has noted that Republicans did not filibuster Obama’s two first-term nominees. McConnell said Trump should get the same treatment.
“We have every right to expect the same courtesy from today’s minority when we receive this nomination tomorrow,” he said from the Senate floor.
The GOP also could opt for the “nuclear option” by changing Senate rules to get rid of the 60-vote threshold for Supreme Court nominees, something Trump has said should be done if Democrats block his pick. McConnell has repeatedly signaled he does not want to take that step, most recently in an interview with The Hill on Friday.
Spicer declined on Monday to weigh in on whether the Senate should change the rules.
It’s not clear whether Democrats would be able to sustain a filibuster on any Trump pick.
Schumer’s office declined to comment on whether he would move to require 60 votes for Trump’s picks.
He added during an interview on NBC’s “Today” show Monday that Democrats weren’t looking for “payback” over Garland’s treatment.
Complicating the fight are the 10 Democrats up for reelection in 2018 in states Trump won.
The Senate Leadership Fund, which has ties to McConnell, questioned whether Sens. Joe ManchinJoe ManchinDemocrats hope Biden can flip Manchin and Sinema On The Money — Presented by Wells Fargo — Democrats advance tax plan through hurdles House Democrat says she won't support reconciliation bill 'at this early stage' MORE (D-W.Va.), Heidi HeitkampMary (Heidi) Kathryn HeitkampProgressives prepare to launch counterattack in tax fight Business groups aim to divide Democrats on .5T spending bill On The Money: Powell signals Fed will soon cut stimulus MORE (D-N.D.), Jon TesterJonathan (Jon) TesterDemocrats say Biden must get more involved in budget fight Senate backers of new voting rights bill push for swift passage The Hill's 12:30 Report - Presented by Facebook - Polls open in California as Newsom fights for job MORE (D-Mont.) or Claire McCaskillClaire Conner McCaskillRepublicans may regret restricting reproductive rights Sunday shows preview: States deal with fallout of Ida; Texas abortion law takes effect Giuliani to stump for Greitens in Missouri MORE (D-Mo.), all up for reelection, would support Merkley’s filibuster.
The Judicial Crisis Network, a conservative group, plans to spend $10 million to confirm Trump’s nominee, while Tea Party Patriots plans to hold 1,000 house parties in the next 100 days to rally activists.
Carrie Severino, chief counsel and policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network, says her group will mount a pressure campaign targeting the 10 Democrats running for reelection in states that supported Trump.
“For the Democrats who are up for reelection in 2018, it’s going to mean choosing between the interests of their constituents and the interests of Democratic politicians,” she said.
On the left, organizers say hundreds of groups, including People for the American Way, the Alliance for Justice, MoveOn.org and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, are planning to flood Senate offices with phone calls and constituent visits.
“There will be a wall of opposition senators are going to find among their own constituents,” said Ben Winkler, Washington director of MoveOn.org.
Liberal groups won’t disclose the size of their budgets and concede that conservative groups will likely outspend them, but they say the money can be matched by grassroots activism.
“We’re gearing up. We’re ready to fight,” said Marge Baker, executive director of People for the American Way. “It’s going to be big. I’ve been here 14 years. This is huge. Partly because the events of the past week have shown how important the courts are.”