Dem senator bashes Trump judicial nominee over hearing testimony: 'Hoo-boy'

A Democratic senator mocked one of President TrumpDonald John Trump Former US ambassador: 'Denmark is not a big fan of Donald Trump and his politics' Senate Democrats push for arms control language in defense policy bill Detroit county sheriff endorses Booker for president MORE's judicial nominees on Thursday, posting video of the nominee struggling to provide answers to a GOP senator's line of questioning.

Sen. Sheldon WhitehouseSheldon WhitehouseSenate Democrats push Trump to permanently shutter migrant detention facility To cash in on innovation, remove market barriers for advanced energy technologies Democrats give cold shoulder to Warren wealth tax MORE (D-R.I.) posted video of Matthew Spencer Petersen, a commissioner on the Federal Election Commission, facing questions during a hearing Wednesday on his nomination to become a district judge on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

Whitehouse touted the video as a "MUST WATCH," noting that the nominee was unable to answer "basic questions of law" after being asked by Sen. John KennedyJohn Neely KennedyMORE (R-La.) about legal procedure.

"Hoo-boy," Whitehouse tweeted.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

After asking Petersen and four other nominees in the video whether they had ever "tried a case to verdict," Kennedy narrowed his questioning to Petersen, who admitted he had not.

"Do you know what a motion in limine is?" Kennedy asked.

"I would probably not be able to give you a good definition," Petersen responded.

"Do you know what the Younger abstention doctrine is?" Kennedy continued.

"I've heard of it, but again," Petersen responded, trailing off.

"How about the Pullman abstention doctrine?" Kennedy added. Again, Petersen was unable to respond, shaking his head.

Petersen defended his inability to answer the questions in a brief statement, telling Kennedy that he is aware that his path to the nomination for a district judge was unorthodox.

"I haven't had to do a deep dive ... and I understand, and I appreciate this line of questioning, I understand the challenge that would be ahead of me if I were fortunate enough to be named a district court judge," he said.

"I understand that the path many successful district court judges has been a different one than I have taken," Petersen continued, adding that he believed that he was still qualified.

The White House announced this week it would withdraw two controversial judicial nominees opposed by Sen. Chuck GrassleyCharles (Chuck) Ernest GrassleyWhite House denies exploring payroll tax cut to offset worsening economy Schumer joins Pelosi in opposition to post-Brexit trade deal that risks Northern Ireland accord GOP senators call for Barr to release full results of Epstein investigation MORE (R-Iowa), who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee. Those nominees were under fire for controversial statements made in the past, and one had also practiced law for less than three years.