Health clubs press for membership tax break

Health-club owners are on Capitol Hill this week to drum up support for a measure that would allow companies to get a tax deduction for their employees’ gym memberships.

The legislation, known as the Workforce Health Improvement (WHIP) Act, would drive up membership rolls at health clubs and promote physical fitness for inactive and overweight Americans, the gym owners argue.

“We know that physical exercise is an acknowledged, proven and cost-effective therapy in the prevention and treatment of a significant number of diseases — from cancer to depression, from diabetes to heart disease,” said John McCarthy, executive director of the International Health, Racquet and Sportsclub Association (IHRSA). “The WHIP Act, and our efforts here in Washington this week, are part of our ongoing efforts to help remove the barriers to exercise.”

Sens. John CornynJohn CornynTrump scramble to rack up accomplishments gives conservatives heartburn On The Money: Trump, China announce 'Phase One' trade deal | Supreme Court takes up fight over Trump financial records | House panel schedules hearing, vote on new NAFTA deal On The Money: Lawmakers strike spending deal | US, China reach limited trade deal ahead of tariff deadline | Lighthizer fails to quell GOP angst over new NAFTA MORE (R-Texas) and Tom HarkinThomas (Tom) Richard HarkinNew Hampshire parochialism, not whiteness, bedevils Democrats Democrats must question possible political surveillance Wisconsin lawmaker gets buzz-cut after vowing not to cut hair until sign language bill passed MORE (D-Iowa) and Reps. Zach Wamp (R-Tenn.) and Mark UdallMark Emery UdallDemocrats will win back the Senate majority in 2020, all thanks to President Trump Poll: Trump trails three Democrats by 10 points in Colorado The Hill's Morning Report — Trump and the new Israel-'squad' controversy MORE (D-Colo.) have sponsored Senate and House versions of the legislation.

Similar bills introduced in the 108th Congress gained modest support.

The proposed legislation would allow companies to treat off-site gym memberships as employee benefits, a potential boon to independent gym owners. It would also prevent those benefits from being counted as taxable income for employees. Current law allows only onsite, employer-provided fitness facilities to be classified as benefits.

Obesity and inactivity in Americans have received scant attention from Congress in recent years. Last year, the House passed the so-called “Cheeseburger Bill,” which would have shielded fast-food chains from lawsuits charging that the restaurants’ hefty offerings contributed to customers’ expanding waistlines and subsequent health problems.

Lawmakers themselves have complimentary fitness facilities onsite on Capitol Hill. A number of lawmakers enjoy staying in shape. Sen. Max BaucusMax Sieben BaucusBottom line Overnight Defense: McCain honored in Capitol ceremony | Mattis extends border deployment | Trump to embark on four-country trip after midterms Congress gives McCain the highest honor MORE (D-Mont.) regularly runs in ultramarathons, which are races longer than the standard marathon distance of 26 miles. Many members of Congress, including Sens. Chuck HagelCharles (Chuck) Timothy HagelAlmost 100 former officials, members of Congress urge Senate action on election security GOP Senate candidate said Republicans have 'dual loyalties' to Israel White House aide moves to lobbying firm MORE (R-Neb.) and John Sununu (R-N.H.), took part in a three-mile run last weekend sponsored by the American Council of Life Insurers.

Some legislators have struggled with obesity. Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) had gastric bypass surgery in 2002 in a successful effort to bring his weight under 300 pounds.

Aside from the gym owners, many other interest groups have been drawing their members to Washington in recent months to lobby on various issues. Spring is a prime season for such legislative “fly-ins,” as they are sometimes known, because Congress is in session and new legislation is just beginning to get off the ground.

This year, however, the Senate battle over filibustering judicial nominees may hamper debate in the Senate and prevent the chamber from considering other business.