Trump judicial nominee Neomi Rao seeks to clarify past remarks on date rape

President TrumpDonald John TrumpJustice Department preparing for Mueller report as soon as next week: reports Smollett lawyers declare 'Empire' star innocent Pelosi asks members to support resolution against emergency declaration MORE's D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals nominee Neomi Rao further clarified Monday her past remarks on date rape in a letter to the ranking members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Rao, who serves as Trump’s regulatory czar, was grilled last week by the committee about controversial writings that surfaced after her nomination, namely a 1994 opinion piece for The Yale Herald in which she appeared to argue that women are partially to blame for sexual assault.

ADVERTISEMENT

She wrote at the time that if a woman “drinks to the point where she can no longer choose, well, getting to that point was a part of her choice.”

Rao went into much more detail in her letter Monday than during the hearing last week.

"Upon reviewing a transcript of the hearing, and after conversations with members of the Committee, I concluded my testimony may not have adequately conveyed my current views on the subject," she wrote to Judiciary Chairman Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamFBI’s top lawyer believed Hillary Clinton should face charges, but was talked out of it Overnight Defense: Graham clashed with Pentagon chief over Syria | Talk grows that Trump will fire Coats | Coast Guard officer accused of domestic terrorism plot Graham cursed at acting DOD chief, declaring himself his 'adversary' MORE (R-S.C.) and ranking member Dianne FeinsteinDianne Emiel FeinsteinFeinstein says she thinks Biden will run after meeting with him Trump judicial nominee Neomi Rao seeks to clarify past remarks on date rape Bottom Line MORE (D-Calif.)

"While responding to events and debates on campus, I failed to recognize the hurt my words could cause a survivor of such crimes. I recognize now the arguments I made might discourage a victim from coming forward or seeking help. With little knowledge or experience, I lacked the perspective of how this might be perceived by others, particularly victims of sexual assault."

"If I were to address these issues now, I would have more empathy and perspective."

Rao is currently the administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, a subagency tasked with reviewing and approving agency actions.

In her role, she has led Trump’s push to roll back regulations, particularly those enacted during the Obama administration.

Democrats have expressed worry that those rules she helped repeal might end up being challenged in the D.C. court.

The regional appeals court is viewed as the nation’s second most powerful because to the cases presented to it. The court hears challenges to regulatory actions taken by the federal government.

Feinstein asked Rao to commit to recusing herself from all cases involving the Trump administration’s regulatory moves during last week's hearing. Rao responded that she would look into recusal standards and follow D.C. court precedent on the issue.