DC attorney general subpoenas Trump Inaugural Committee: report

Washington, D.C.'s attorney general has issued a subpoena for documents relating to President TrumpDonald John TrumpPompeo changes staff for Russia meeting after concerns raised about top negotiator's ties: report House unravels with rise of 'Les Enfants Terrible' Ben Carson: Trump is not a racist and his comments were not racist MORE's inaugural committee, The New York Times reported Wednesday. 

The latest subpoena marks the third governmental authority seeking documents related to how the committee reportedly raised $107 million and used that money to fund Trump’s inauguration, the Times reported. Federal prosecutors in New York and New Jersey's attorney general have also reportedly subpoenaed committee documents.

Washington Attorney General Karl Racine is probing whether funds “were wasted, mismanaged and/or improperly provided private benefit, causing the committee to exceed or abuse its authority or act contrary to its nonprofit purpose,” according to the Times.

ADVERTISEMENT

The subpoena also requests documents related to payments to the Trump Organization or the Trump International Hotel, the Times reported. The hotel was reportedly given $1.5 million for food, rooms and ballroom use.

Prosecutors are also seeking information on whether Ivanka TrumpIvana (Ivanka) Marie TrumpLiberal think tank: GOP paid parental leave proposals are too narrow Ivanka Trump's women's initiative unveils million in new grants The Hill's Morning Report - House Democrats clash over next steps at border MORE, Donald Trump Jr.Donald (Don) John TrumpThe Hill's Morning Report — Trump retreats on census citizenship question Trump set to host controversial social media summit Trump associate Felix Sater grilled by House Intel MORE or Eric TrumpEric Frederick TrumpEric Trump: '95 percent of this country' is behind Trump's message Trump Jr. blasts reports of Kushner feud: 'More fake news bulls---' Chicago mayor says waitress crossed 'the line' by spitting on Eric Trump MORE had a role on the committee and whether there were any payments to committee officials or their companies.

A spokesman for Racine declined to comment on whether a subpoena was issued.

"It is our general practice to not confirm, deny, or comment on confidential enforcement activity," he said in an email to The Hill.

A spokesperson for the committee told the Times that they were in communication with Racine's office.