DC attorney general subpoenas Trump Inaugural Committee: report

Washington, D.C.'s attorney general has issued a subpoena for documents relating to President TrumpDonald John TrumpNASA exec leading moon mission quits weeks after appointment The Hill's Morning Report — After contentious week, Trump heads for Japan Frustration boils over with Senate's 'legislative graveyard' MORE's inaugural committee, The New York Times reported Wednesday. 

The latest subpoena marks the third governmental authority seeking documents related to how the committee reportedly raised $107 million and used that money to fund Trump’s inauguration, the Times reported. Federal prosecutors in New York and New Jersey's attorney general have also reportedly subpoenaed committee documents.

Washington Attorney General Karl Racine is probing whether funds “were wasted, mismanaged and/or improperly provided private benefit, causing the committee to exceed or abuse its authority or act contrary to its nonprofit purpose,” according to the Times.

ADVERTISEMENT

The subpoena also requests documents related to payments to the Trump Organization or the Trump International Hotel, the Times reported. The hotel was reportedly given $1.5 million for food, rooms and ballroom use.

Prosecutors are also seeking information on whether Ivanka TrumpIvana (Ivanka) Marie TrumpTrump family members will join state visit to UK The Hill's 12:30 Report: Trump blows up meeting after Pelosi 'cover up' remarks Trump adviser expected to leave White House, join Juul MORE, Donald Trump Jr.Donald (Don) John TrumpTrump Jr. slams Republican committee chairman: 'Too weak to stand up to the Democrats' #TrumpTantrum spreads on Twitter after impromptu press conference Trump family members will join state visit to UK MORE or Eric TrumpEric Frederick TrumpTrump family members will join state visit to UK New financial disclosure forms provide glimpses of Trump's wealth De Blasio blasts Trump as he launches 2020 bid: 'Every New Yorker knows he's a con artist' MORE had a role on the committee and whether there were any payments to committee officials or their companies.

A spokesman for Racine declined to comment on whether a subpoena was issued.

"It is our general practice to not confirm, deny, or comment on confidential enforcement activity," he said in an email to The Hill.

A spokesperson for the committee told the Times that they were in communication with Racine's office.