DC attorney general subpoenas Trump Inaugural Committee: report

Washington, D.C.'s attorney general has issued a subpoena for documents relating to President TrumpDonald John TrumpJimmy Carter: 'I hope there's an age limit' on presidency White House fires DHS general counsel: report Trump to cap California trip with visit to the border MORE's inaugural committee, The New York Times reported Wednesday. 

The latest subpoena marks the third governmental authority seeking documents related to how the committee reportedly raised $107 million and used that money to fund Trump’s inauguration, the Times reported. Federal prosecutors in New York and New Jersey's attorney general have also reportedly subpoenaed committee documents.

Washington Attorney General Karl Racine is probing whether funds “were wasted, mismanaged and/or improperly provided private benefit, causing the committee to exceed or abuse its authority or act contrary to its nonprofit purpose,” according to the Times.

ADVERTISEMENT

The subpoena also requests documents related to payments to the Trump Organization or the Trump International Hotel, the Times reported. The hotel was reportedly given $1.5 million for food, rooms and ballroom use.

Prosecutors are also seeking information on whether Ivanka TrumpIvana (Ivanka) Marie TrumpTrump awards Yankees legend Mariano Rivera the Medal of Freedom The Hill's Morning Report - Trump takes 2020 roadshow to New Mexico 2020 is not a family affair, for a change MORE, Donald Trump Jr.Donald (Don) John TrumpDemocrats introduce bill to block taxpayer-funded spending at Trump properties Trump dismisses NYT explanation on Kavanaugh correction The Hill's Morning Report - Trump takes 2020 roadshow to New Mexico MORE or Eric TrumpEric Frederick TrumpDemocrats introduce bill to block taxpayer-funded spending at Trump properties WaPo gives Eric Trump 4 Pinocchios after ObamaCare website claim Pompeo jokes about speaking at Trump hotel: 'The guy who owns it' is 'going to be successful' MORE had a role on the committee and whether there were any payments to committee officials or their companies.

A spokesman for Racine declined to comment on whether a subpoena was issued.

"It is our general practice to not confirm, deny, or comment on confidential enforcement activity," he said in an email to The Hill.

A spokesperson for the committee told the Times that they were in communication with Racine's office.