DOJ attorney looking into whether CIA withheld info during start of Russia probe: NYT

DOJ attorney looking into whether CIA withheld info during start of Russia probe: NYT
© Getty Images

Justice Department officials are investigating whether the CIA during the Obama administration withheld information in the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, according to The New York Times.

John H. Durham, the prosecutor examining the case, is reportedly pursuing a lead that former CIA director John BrennanJohn Owen BrennanEx-CIA chief calls Trump intel shakeup a 'virtual decapitation' of the intelligence community DOJ attorney looking into whether CIA withheld info during start of Russia probe: NYT Federal prosecutor looking into Brennan's role in Russian interference findings: report MORE was trying to steer the Russia investigation in a particular direction and withheld information from other agencies to achieve that goal.

Officials from the FBI and NSA, however, have told Durham that the theory is incorrect and misrepresents how the intelligence community functions, the Times reported. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Durham has not interviewed former FBI Director James ComeyJames Brien ComeyBill Barr is trying his best to be Trump's Roy Cohn Comey responds to Trump with Mariah Carey gif: 'Why are you so obsessed with me?' Trump punts on Stone pardon decision after sentencing MORE or former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabeAndrew George McCabeTrump allies assembled lists of officials considered disloyal to president: report Bill Barr is trying his best to be Trump's Roy Cohn Comey responds to Trump with Mariah Carey gif: 'Why are you so obsessed with me?' MORE. He also has not interviewed Brennan, though he has requested his emails, according to the Times.

“It’s kind of silly,” Brennan said on MSNBC’s "Hardball" Thursday evening. “Is there a criminal investigation now on analytic judgments and the activities of CIA in terms of trying to protect our national security? I’m certainly willing to talk to Mr. Durham or anybody else who has any questions about what we did during this period of 2016.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The report from Times comes after all four federal prosecutors involved in the case of Roger StoneRoger Jason StoneStone judge under pressure over calls for new trial Stone juror: Trump 'attacking citizens for performing their civic duty' The Hill's Morning Report - Sanders takes incoming during intense SC debate MORE, a convicted former Trump campaign adviser, left the case after their sentence recommendation was later reduced by the Justice Department.

“It clearly, I think, is another indication that Donald Trump is using the Department of Justice to go after his enemies any way he can,” Brennan added on MSNBC.

Trump has previously questioned the American intelligence community. In January 2017, after the intelligence community determined Russian agents interfered with the 2016 election, Trump said “I don’t see any reason why” Russia would have interfered in the election.

Retired Adm. Mike RogersMichael (Mike) Dennis RogersTwitter falling short on pledge to verify primary candidates Overnight Health Care — Presented by American Health Care Association — White House to request emergency coronavirus funds | Trump backs off plan to house virus patients in Alabama | Court sides with Trump in family planning case Trump backs off plan to house coronavirus patients in Alabama after GOP objections MORE, who was head of the NSA at the time, was interviewed last summer and last fall about a slight difference in opinion the NSA had with the other two agencies on Russian interference, the Times reported. Durham has since used that to poke a hole in the legitimacy of the investigation.

“I wouldn’t call it a discrepancy, I’d call it an honest difference of opinion between three different organizations, and, in the end, I made that call,” Rogers told the Senate in May 2017. “It didn’t have the same level of sourcing and the same level of multiple sources.”