SPONSORED:

The Memo: Storm brewing after chaotic Berman firing

Shock over the Trump administration’s firing of a top government prosecutor is reverberating across the political world, but not even the president’s foes are confident he will face consequences.

Legal experts — especially those critical of what they see as President TrumpDonald TrumpGuardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa wins GOP primary in NYC mayor's race Garland dismisses broad review of politicization of DOJ under Trump Schumer vows next steps after 'ridiculous,' 'awful' GOP election bill filibuster MORE’s erosion of the independence of the justice system — are appalled at the firing of Geoffrey Berman in contentious circumstances.

Berman was spearheading a number of investigations that touched on the president and his circle in his role as the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY).

ADVERTISEMENT

“If the president fired Berman in order to forestall or prevent an ongoing investigation, then it is absolutely clear that fits the definition of obstruction of justice, and it is a crime,” said Claire Finkelstein, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School and the director of its Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law.

Referring to Berman, Finkelstein added, “He was obviously the lynchpin for a lot of important investigations.”

Among the matters currently under investigation by the SDNY is whether the president’s attorney, former New York City Mayor Rudy GiulianiRudy GiulianiGuardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa wins GOP primary in NYC mayor's race The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - Democrats await Manchin decision on voting rights bill Newsmax hires Jenna Ellis, Hogan Gidley as contributors MORE, violated laws on lobbying for foreign interests in relation to Ukraine.

To many observers, the ouster of Berman brought to mind the firing of FBI Director James ComeyJames Brien ComeyMystery surrounds Justice's pledge on journalist records NYT publisher: DOJ phone records seizure a 'dangerous incursion' on press freedom Trump DOJ seized phone records of New York Times reporters MORE in May 2017. The push against Comey led to the appointment of special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) MuellerSenate Democrats urge Garland not to fight court order to release Trump obstruction memo Why a special counsel is guaranteed if Biden chooses Yates, Cuomo or Jones as AG Barr taps attorney investigating Russia probe origins as special counsel MORE and put a cloud of suspicion over Trump that lasted roughly two years and was never conclusively dispelled.

A chaotic sequence of events over the weekend was sparked Friday evening when Barr announced that Berman had stepped down. Berman shot back with a statement that he had not resigned, nor did he have any intention of doing so.

On Saturday, Barr sent Berman a letter saying that Trump had officially fired him. The same day, Trump told reporters that he was “not involved” in the decision.

ADVERTISEMENT

On Monday, the White House sought to put further distance between Trump and the firing.

White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany told reporters at a briefing that the president had been involved only “in a sign-off capacity.”

“The attorney general was taking the lead on this matter. He did come to the president and report to him when Mr. Berman decided not to leave, and at that point is when the president agreed with the attorney general,” McEnany said.

Further complicating the political dynamics for Trump, no compelling rationale for the firing of Berman has been given. In addition, an effort to replace him with Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Jay Clayton appears to have run aground, at least for now.

Clayton would need to be approved by the Senate. But Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamThe Hill's Equilibrium — Presented by NextEra Energy — Tasmanian devil wipes out penguin population The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - Biden support, gas tax questions remain on infrastructure This week: Senate set for voting rights fight MORE (R-S.C.), usually a staunch Trump ally, has indicated he will not fight a de facto veto that Clayton’s home state senators can use against him. The senators in question are both New York Democrats: Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerWhite House draws ire of progressives amid voting rights defeat Murkowski to vote 'no' on voting rights bill Harris to preside over Senate for voting rights debate MORE and Sen. Kirsten GillibrandKirsten GillibrandPentagon chief backs change to military sexual assault prosecution Overnight Defense: Joint Chiefs warn against sweeping reform to military justice system | Senate panel plans July briefing on war authorization repeal | National Guard may have 'training issues' if not reimbursed Joint Chiefs warn against sweeping reform to military justice system MORE. Both have called on Clayton to withdraw his name from consideration for the post.

Berman’s interim replacement will be his former deputy, Audrey Strauss, a well-respected career prosecutor who virtually no one expects to take the SDNY’s foot off the gas in relation to any ongoing investigations.

Caroline Polisi, a criminal defense attorney and a partner at Armstrong Teasdale, described the idea of appointing Clayton, who has never been a federal prosecutor, as “absolutely ridiculous.”

Polisi described the latest episode as “shocking” but asserted that it was part of a pattern of behavior from the Trump administration.

“It just keeps happening, and each time it happens we all say we can’t believe that happened — and it just happens again,” she said.

The key question for many Trump critics is whether the president or Barr will face any adverse consequences as a result of Berman’s ouster.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold NadlerJerrold (Jerry) Lewis NadlerTech industry pushes for delay in antitrust legislation Senate on collision course over Trump DOJ subpoenas Black Democrats press leaders for reparations vote this month MORE (D-N.Y.) told CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday that any attempt to impeach Barr would be “a waste of time,” even though he suggested the attorney general deserved that fate.

Legal experts are more focused on whether any ongoing investigations will be constrained or abandoned — or whether Barr and Trump could in short order move to dismiss Strauss as well.

ADVERTISEMENT

The SDNY has been long known for its independence, and the fact that Manhattan falls within its jurisdiction raises the dangers for Trump, since that is where his businesses have long been headquartered.

“The stakes are higher because at this point Barr has pretty much tamed the entire department except for the SDNY,” said Harry Litman, a former U.S. attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania. “Because they are in Manhattan, there seem to be five, six, eight investigations into Trump that they are undertaking,”

Meanwhile, however, other Trump foes cast their minds back to Trump’s survival of the Comey firing and all the other allegations investigated by Mueller. They lament that the president feels unshackled as a result.

Richard Painter, a law professor at the University of Minnesota and a former Republican who is now a Trump critic, complained, “Trump got away with it, and he’s doing it again.”

 

The Memo is a reported column by Niall Stanage, primarily focused on Donald Trump’s presidency.