A group of more than 60 former lawmakers have joined a legal brief that encourages a federal judge to dismiss former President TrumpDonald TrumpBiden heading to Kansas City to promote infrastructure package Trump calls Milley a 'f---ing idiot' over Afghanistan withdrawal First rally for far-right French candidate Zemmour prompts protests, violence MORE’s claims of executive privilege as they relate to the investigation into the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.
The brief, as first reported by Politico, argues that Congress's need for documents related to the Jan. 6 riot takes precedence over any potential claim of executive privilege by Trump, especially considering the president is a target of the probe.
“Congress's power to do so here is not reduced — and is likely elevated — where the targets of the investigation include a former President and sitting Members of Congress,” the 21-page brief, which entered the D.C. federal district court docket on Friday, reads.
“Under these circumstances, no personal interests of Mr. Trump or disputed and unresolved questions of executive privilege could possibly tilt the scales against disclosing these records to the Select Committee,” the brief adds.
The coalition of 66 lawmakers — made up of 24 Republicans and 42 Democrats — argues that Trump played an “outsized role” in the lead up to the deadly attack.
“From what is publicly known, it is clear that (1) Donald Trump played an outsized — and likely central — role in orchestrating the events that gave rise to the January 6th attack,” the lawmakers wrote.
“And (2) the various means he used or contemplated are documented in the records the Committee seeks and are still not known,” they added.
The brief was filed under the purview of Protect Democracy, a nonprofit government watchdog.
Protect Democracy has contended that Congressional lawmakers need to completely understand what happened on Jan. 6 in order to adequately write legislation that responds to the attack, according to Politico.
Trump filed lawsuits against the House Jan. 6 select committee and the National Archives in an effort to prevent records from his time in the White House being released to the investigative panel.
The select committee and National Archives and Records Administration are scheduled to submit a response to the lawsuits by Friday, then U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan is set to hear the case next week, according to Politico.
Trump is arguing that his records are protected by executive privilege.
“As it relates to any materials being sought in situations like this, where fundamental privileges and constitutional issues are at stake and where a committee has declined to grant sufficient time to conduct a full review, there is a longstanding bipartisan tradition of protective assertions of executive privilege designed to ensure the ability to make a final assertion, if necessary, over some or all of the requested material,” the lawsuit reads.
The president has also argued that the request for documents from the committee is too large to be lawful, lacks a legislative justification and would decrease privilege protections for future presidents, according to Politico.
President BidenJoe BidenChina eyes military base on Africa's Atlantic coast: report Biden orders flags be flown at half-staff through Dec. 9 to honor Dole Biden heading to Kansas City to promote infrastructure package MORE, however, has already rejected a number of Trump’s claims of executive privilege, concluding that the former president’s assertion of privilege “is not justified.”
The former lawmakers also write in the brief that Trump’s authority to claim executive privilege should only be allowed for actions taken in his official presidential capacity, and not efforts he made that related to the campaign trail, according to Politico.
“And as Senate Minority Leader [Mitch] McConnell explained, the efforts to overturn the election were not the official acts of a President; they were ‘a disgraceful dereliction of duty,’” the brief reads. “The executive privilege does not apply, thus ending the inquiry and dooming the motion presently before the Court.”
Former Reps. Carlos CurbeloCarlos Luis CurbeloProtecting the freedom to vote should be a bipartisan issue Former lawmakers sign brief countering Trump's claims of executive privilege in Jan. 6 investigation A conservative's faith argument for supporting LGBTQ rights MORE (R-Fla.), Reid RibbleReid James RibbleFormer lawmakers sign brief countering Trump's claims of executive privilege in Jan. 6 investigation The Memo: What now for anti-Trump Republicans? Influential Republicans threaten to form new party MORE (R-Wis.), Henry WaxmanHenry Arnold WaxmanThe Hill's Top Lobbyists 2021 Former lawmakers sign brief countering Trump's claims of executive privilege in Jan. 6 investigation Democrats call for oil company executives to testify on disinformation campaign MORE (D-Calif.), Joseph Crowley (D-N.Y.), Barney Frank (D-Mass.), Bruce BraleyBruce Lowell BraleyFormer lawmakers sign brief countering Trump's claims of executive privilege in Jan. 6 investigation The Memo: Trump attacks on Harris risk backfiring 2020 caucuses pose biggest challenge yet for Iowa's top pollster MORE (D-Iowa), John BarrowJohn Jenkins BarrowFormer lawmakers sign brief countering Trump's claims of executive privilege in Jan. 6 investigation Draft Georgia congressional lines target McBath, shore up Bourdeaux On The Trail: The political losers of 2020 MORE (D-Ga.), Lois CappsLois Ragnhild CappsFormer lawmakers sign brief countering Trump's claims of executive privilege in Jan. 6 investigation Dem lawmaker wants federal laws rewritten with gender neutral terms Dems pressure Fiat Chrysler to support recalled rental ban MORE (D-Calif.) and Steve IsraelSteven (Steve) J. IsraelUnsubscribe! The tyranny of political fundraising emails Hamlin opens up on playing anthrax-era Tom Brokaw After victory, Biden seeks political rebound MORE (D-N.Y.) signed on to the brief, in addition to former Sen. Gary Hart (D-Colo.).
The Hill reached out to Trump for comment.
—Updated Oct. 29 at 5:24 p.m.