Blair's departure leaves Obama with difficult Intel. position to fill

The office has turned over four times in five years, with retired U.S. Navy Admiral Dennis Blair on Thursday becoming the last person to resign from the post.

Blair quit under pressure after a string of failures by U.S. spy agencies to detect terrorist plots. But he also resigned amid several turf wars with other administration officials, a problem that also bedeviled his predecessors.

Blair’s departure has renewed debate over the role and powers of the position first created in 
response to recommendations by the 9/11 Commission, which sought to 
tear down walls between domestic and international intelligence 
gathering and information sharing.


Congress, however, failed to give the DNI full budget and personnel
 authority over the massive bureaucracy the position is supposed to 
lead, or clear lines of oversight over the 16 U.S. intelligence
 agencies. Key lawmakers are already weighing whether new legislation
 should be passed to give the position more power while former
 intelligence officials and leaders of the 9/11 Commission argue that 
it’s the president’s responsibility to give the position the heft and
 authority it needs.

Whoever Obama picks to fill the post will face new pressure to redefine the job’s authority and power even while they navigate a difficult Congressional confirmation process.

The White House on Friday pledged to name a new director soon, and
 administration officials say James Clapper, the Pentagon’s top
 intelligence official, is the leading candidate to fill the post.
 Another candidate is Mike Vickers, the Pentagon’s assistant secretary 
for special operations.

Those names are already generating criticism among vocal Republican
 critics of the administration’s national security policy.

Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.), the ranking member of the Senate intelligence
 committee, said the position requires independence from other 
intelligence and defense agencies, gravitas and political strength. 
The only person Bond sees as having all of these qualities is CIA 
Director Leon Panetta, who likely would not want to leave to help 
restructure the DNI considering the position’s rocky history.

Bond never supported the creation of the DNI and argues that history 
shows that it cannot be tasked with all of the responsibility and no
 authority. He has also accused the Obama administration of giving
 Attorney General Eric HolderEric Himpton HolderState courts become battlegrounds in redistricting fights New Hampshire Republicans advance map with substantially redrawn districts Michigan redistricting spat exposes competing interests in Democratic coalition MORE too much control over national 
security decisions, which he believes must stop in order for the DNI 
to assume its proper role.

“Bond’s position has been that it doesn’t matter who takes the job if
 the nation’s terror-fighting strategy is still being run out of the
 Department of Justice,” said Bond spokeswoman Shana Marchio. “Also,
 Congress must act to give the new DNI the authority to do the job.”

Homeland Security Committee Chairman Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Sen.
Susan CollinsSusan Margaret Collins'All or nothing' won't bolster American democracy: Reform the filibuster and Electoral Count Act Voting rights, Trump's Big Lie, and Republicans' problem with minorities More than 30 million families to lose child tax credit checks starting this weekend MORE (R-Maine), its ranking member, have said they are
 considering legislation that will give the DNI more budget authority 
and specific oversight authorities over all the intelligence agencies.

Lieberman has clashed with the administration’s counterterrorism
 policies, especially on its handling of the Fort Hood shooting by Army 
Maj. Nadal Malik Hasan, which left 13 dead. Lieberman issued a
 subpoena to the Justice Department last month for more documents
 related to the attack, but the agency so far has failed to produce the
 information requested.

Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.), the ranking member of the House
 intelligence panel, has been particularly vocal in his criticism of
 the administration’s decision to try 9/11 suspects in federal courts,
 rather than military commissions, as well as its attempt to shutter
 Guantanamo Bay and move remaining detainees to a prison facility in

If the Obama administration names Clapper to the position of DNI, it
 can expect harsh criticism from Hoesktra and other Republicans, Hoekstra indicated.

Hoesktra said Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) who sits on the Homeland 
Security panel, would be an ideal choice to fill the DNI post even
 though he and Harmon have policy differences.

“She knows the intelligence business very well and has respect for her
 colleagues on the Hill and would continue working with us,” he said.

At a House Homeland Security Committee hearing earlier this week
 before Blair’s resignation, Lee Hamilton, vice chairman of the 9/11
 Commission, emphasized the need for President Obama to clarify the 
role of the DNI, a point he’s been trying to hammer home during 
several recent appearances before Congressional Committees with

“The burden is on the president now to clarify who is in charge of the 
intelligence community, where the final authority lies on budget,
 personnel and other matters,” Hamilton said. “As long as you leave it
 to the inter-agency process without clear direction from the 
president, you are not going to have an integrated intelligence