Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Warren11 senators urge House to pass .5T package before infrastructure bill Senate Democrats seeking information from SPACs, questioning 'misaligned incentives' UN secretary-general blasts space tourism MORE (D-Mass.) made impeaching President TrumpDonald TrumpTexas announces election audit in four counties after Trump demand Schumer sets Monday showdown on debt ceiling-government funding bill Pennsylvania AG sues to block GOP subpoenas in election probe MORE a key campaign issue when she became the first Democratic presidential candidate to call for it publicly.
Previously, the crowd of hopeful presidential nominees steered clear of the issue — and some still do, with multiple candidates deferring to Congress.
But Warren wading in after the release of the report on special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) MuellerSenate Democrats urge Garland not to fight court order to release Trump obstruction memo Why a special counsel is guaranteed if Biden chooses Yates, Cuomo or Jones as AG Barr taps attorney investigating Russia probe origins as special counsel MORE’s investigation into Russia's election interference reignited the debate over whether Democrats should pursue proceedings to impeach Trump.
Mueller's public comments on the report May 29 further pushed some Democratic candidates toward impeachment proceedings.
Here’s where they currently stand.
Warren was the first 2020 candidate to clearly call for proceedings on April 19, following the public release of Mueller’s report.
“The severity of this misconduct demands that elected officials in both parties set aside political considerations and do their constitutional duty,” she tweeted on Friday. “That means the House should initiate impeachment proceedings against the President of the United States.”
The severity of this misconduct demands that elected officials in both parties set aside political considerations and do their constitutional duty. That means the House should initiate impeachment proceedings against the President of the United States.— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) April 19, 2019
Sen. Kamala HarrisKamala HarrisBiden taps big bank skeptic to for top regulatory post Harris unveils 0M commitment to new global health fund Senate advances Biden consumer bureau pick after panel logjam MORE (D-Calif.) initially said that more information is needed before making a decision, but advocated for impeachment in a town hall on April 22.
"We have very good reason to believe that there is an investigation that has been conducted which has produced evidence that tells us that this president and his administration engaged in obstruction of justice. I believe Congress should take the steps toward impeachment," Harris said at a CNN town hall in New Hampshire.
Sen. Cory BookerCory BookerThe Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Alibaba - Biden jumps into frenzied Dem spending talks Biden employs flurry of meetings to unite warring factions Biden says he will review executive actions after police reform talks fail MORE (D-N.J.) announced his support for impeachment proceedings on May 29 following a press conference from Mueller, the special counsel’s first public comments since being appointed.
“Robert Mueller’s statement makes it clear: Congress has a legal and moral obligation to begin impeachment proceedings immediately,” Booker tweeted.
“I’ve been asking for Mueller’s testimony—today he made his views clear. This Administration has continued to stonewall Congress’s oversight. Beginning impeachment proceedings is the only path forward.”
Following Mueller’s press conference on May 29, Sen. Kirsten GillibrandKirsten Gillibrand11 senators urge House to pass .5T package before infrastructure bill Hochul tells Facebook to 'clean up the act' on abortion misinformation after Texas law Democratic senators request probe into Amazon's treatment of pregnant employees MORE (D-N.Y.) switched her position to backing impeachment proceedings.
“It's time for Congress to begin impeachment hearings and follow the facts. Robert Mueller clearly expects Congress to exercise its constitutional authority and take steps that he could not,” she tweeted. “We can't let the president defy basic accountability measures built into our Constitution.”
She had previously called for a decision to be delayed until the public heard from Mueller.
Democratic hopeful Beto O’Rourke on May 4 changed his initial position on impeachment, deferral to Congress, to supporting it.
“We're finally learning the truth about this president. And yes, there has to be consequences. Yes, there has to be accountability. Yes, I think there's enough evidence now for the House of Representatives to move forward with impeachment,” he said in an interview with The Dallas Morning News.
“This is our country, and this is the one chance that we get to ensure that it remains a democracy and that no man, regardless of his position, is above the law.”
Former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro was the first 2020 candidate to back proceedings.
Castro told CNN's Anderson Cooper on April 19 that it would “perfectly reasonable” for Congress to open impeachment proceedings.
“It’s clear that Bob Mueller in his report left that in the hands of Congress,” he added.
On the issue of obstruction of justice, Mueller’s team investigated 10 potential instances, including Trump's firing of FBI Director James ComeyJames Brien ComeyGiuliani told investigators it was OK to 'throw a fake' during campaign DOJ watchdog unable to determine if FBI fed Giuliani information ahead of 2016 election Biden sister has book deal, set to publish in April MORE and efforts to deny that he ordered then-White House counsel Don McGahn to demand the special counsel be removed.
After laying out the cases, the special counsel did not reach a conclusion in his report, but did mention that Congress has the authority to conduct obstruction of justice investigations.
Former Colorado Gov. John HickenlooperJohn HickenlooperRep. Tim Ryan becomes latest COVID-19 breakthrough case in Congress NY Democrat tests positive for COVID-19 in latest House breakthrough case Florida Democrat becomes latest breakthrough COVID-19 case in House MORE on May 30 said he had been swayed by Mueller’s press conference and now supports impeachment proceedings.
“After listening to Mueller, and I wanted to hear what he had to say, I think of myself as an extreme moderate, but I think he laid the responsibility clearly at the doorstep of Congress. I think we have to begin an impeachment inquiry. That doesn’t mean we’re going to impeach President Trump tomorrow or maybe ever. But I do think we have an obligation to follow where the facts lead,” Hickenlooper said on CNN.
Rep. Seth MoultonSeth MoultonHow lawmakers aided the Afghan evacuation GOP lawmaker says he did not threaten US Embassy staff in Tajikistan House panel approves B boost for defense budget MORE (D-Mass.) tweeted on May 29 after Mueller’s press conference that impeachment hearings should begin "tomorrow."
"The Mueller investigation has provided the evidence. It’s up to Congress to examine that evidence and pursue justice to its conclusion, whatever that may be, regardless of the political consequences," Moulton said in an email to supporters.
Miramar, Fla., Mayor Wayne MessamWayne Martin MessamKey moments in the 2020 Democratic presidential race so far Wayne Messam suspends Democratic presidential campaign 2020 primary debate guide: Everything you need to know ahead of the November forum MORE (D) told The Hill he supports impeachment proceedings based on the evidence available.
"Based on what is available I believe the President should be placed under impeachment proceedings and let the weight of the full report carry out the justice the American people deserve," Messam said in an April 22 statement.
"The redacted Mueller Report provides alarming and damning evidence of the Trump Campaign's interactions with Russians. Special counsel Mueller provided evidence that would determine if impeachment proceedings should take place. The full special counsel report without redaction should be released to congress for review to determine If evidence is sufficient to impeach Trump. Congress has the constitutional authority of oversight and must be given the full report," he said.
Rep. Tim RyanTimothy (Tim) RyanOhio Republican tests positive for breakthrough COVID-19 case The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Alibaba - Government shutdown fears increase as leaders dig in Rep. Tim Ryan becomes latest COVID-19 breakthrough case in Congress MORE (D-Ohio) on June 2 called for impeachment proceedings to be initiated.
“When you think that the President has committed comes - and I’ve read the Mueller report and think he obstructed (justice) on multiple occasions - we have a responsibility,” he said during a CNN town hall.
Ryan cited Mueller’s press conference earlier in the week, saying he wanted to know whether Trump's status as president was the only reason why the special counsel chose not to indict.
He had previously deferred to the Judiciary Committee on the issue of impeachment.
Rep. Eric SwalwellEric Michael SwalwellOvernight Defense & National Security — Milley becomes lightning rod The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by National Industries for the Blind - Schumer: Dem unity will happen eventually; Newsom prevails How lawmakers aided the Afghan evacuation MORE on June 13 called for an impeachment inquiry to be launched against Trump, citing an interview from a day prior where the president wouldn't commit to calling the FBI if a foreign power offered damaging information on a political opponent.
He had previously said he was waiting for Mueller to testify before making a decision.
Sen. Amy KlobucharAmy KlobucharHillicon Valley — Presented by Xerox — Officials want action on cyberattacks Senate panel advances antitrust bill that eyes Google, Facebook This week: Democrats face mounting headaches MORE (D-Minn.) first publicly backed impeachment proceedings on June 14, citing Trump’s interview with ABC News earlier that week in which he suggested that if a foreign government offered information he would “take it.”
Trump also would not commit to calling the FBI if a foreign power offered damaging information on a political opponent.
“I would support impeachment proceedings beginning now, but I also understand that they may want to be doing investigations leading up to it and I think they should be given the time to do that,” Klobuchar said on CNN’s “New Day.”
She had previously declined to take a position on the issue, saying senators are meant to be the jury on impeachment.
New York City Mayor Bill de BlasioBill de BlasioMeghan, Prince Harry visit One World Trade Center Google to purchase Manhattan building for .1 billion New York to start weekly COVID-19 testing in schools MORE called for impeachment proceedings on June 14, becoming the third candidate to do so following Trump’s interview in which he wouldn't commit to calling the FBI if a foreign power offered damaging information on a political opponent.
"It was an invitation to make a deal. You get me dirt on my opponents and we’ll take care of you, and we’ve seen no better example than with Russia and Putin where whatever Putin does he gets an affirmation from Donald Trump, and now more and more it looks like in exchange for electoral favors," de Blasio told MSNBC's "Morning Joe."
De Blasio had said before that Democrats should focus on defeating Trump in the 2020 election, rather than on beginning impeachment proceedings.
Not backing impeachment
South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete ButtigiegPete ButtigiegDOJ sues to block JetBlue-American Airlines partnership On The Money — Presented by Wells Fargo — Pelosi plows full speed ahead on jam-packed agenda Blumenthal calls on Buttigieg to investigate American Airlines-JetBlue partnership MORE said in late May that "of course" he supports impeachment proceedings, but stopped short of saying whether the House should begin the process.
On May 29, he inched closer to supporting impeachment when he tweeted that Mueller's comments on his investigation were "as close to an impeachment referral as it gets," adding that Congress "alone can act."
This is as close to an impeachment referral as it gets. Robert Mueller could not clear the president, nor could he charge him — so he has handed the matter to Congress, which alone can act to deliver due process and accountability.— Pete Buttigieg (@PeteButtigieg) May 29, 2019
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) declined to take a position on impeachment, saying senators are meant to be the jury on impeachment.
“Our job is to be jury, so I’ve been really careful talking about if an impeachment is brought before us,” she told MSNBC's Chris Hayes on April 19.
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio (D) on May 29 declined to endorse impeachment, but did say Congress should continue investigations.
“Congress must continue to investigate #ConDon & his cronies,” he tweeted. “I'm focused on beating @RealDonaldTrump in 2020. As a New Yorker, I know all of his tricks and am tough enough to take him on.”
Washington Gov. Jay InsleeJay Robert Inslee Washington state extends eviction protections through end of October Washington governor to Idaho officials: Stop 'clogging up my hospitals' Seattle area to require COVID-19 vaccine to enter indoor venues MORE said “impeachment should not be off the table,” deferring to Congress on April 19.
It is clear that the president tried and tried and tried to stop the Mueller investigation. Congress needs to get to the bottom of what's going on here. Impeachment should not be off the table.https://t.co/ScPHa6eW6N— Jay Inslee (@JayInslee) April 19, 2019
Self-help author Marianne WilliamsonMarianne WilliamsonMarianne Williamson calls federal judge's handling of Steven Donziger case 'unconstitutional' Marianne Williamson calls on Biden to drop efforts to extradite Assange Susan Sarandon and Marianne Williamson call for justice in Steven Donziger case MORE said on April 14 that said Trump’s “fascist leanings” justify impeachment, but left the decision over proceedings to Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).
“As long as the Republicans… are in charge of the Senate, they wouldn’t remove him anyway, so I leave that to Nancy Pelosi,” she said in a CNN town hall. “I think she’s got it together on this issue and I’m sure she understands the quandary very, very well.”
Colorado Sen. Michael BennetMichael Farrand BennetBuild Back Better Act must include funding to restore forests, make communities resilient and create jobs Interior reverses Trump, moves BLM headquarters back to DC Conservation group says it will only endorse Democrats who support .5T spending plan MORE (D) said on May 14 that he was not ready to call for impeachment.
“I’m not ready to say the president should be impeached,” Bennet said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”
“I think it looks from the report as though he’s committed impeachable offenses. I think there is every reason why the investigation in the Congress should continue and then we should make an assessment of where it leads.”
Rep. Tulsi GabbardTulsi GabbardProgressives breathe sigh of relief after Afghan withdrawal Hillicon Valley: US has made progress on cyber but more needed, report says | Democrat urges changes for 'problematic' crypto language in infrastructure bill | Facebook may be forced to unwind Giphy acquisition YouTube rival Rumble strikes deals with Tulsi Gabbard, Glenn Greenwald MORE (D-Hawaii) said Democrats need to move on from the Mueller report on April 21.
"I don't think that we should defeat Donald Trump through impeachment,” she told Fox News. “I think it's really important for us, in this country, to come together and have the American people vote to take Donald Trump out of office in 2020."
Entrepreneur Andrew YangAndrew YangYang's new party will be called 'The Forward Party' Andrew Yang planning to launch third party: report Poll: 73 percent of Democratic voters would consider voting for Biden in the 2024 primary MORE suggested in an April 18 tweet that the decision over impeachment should be left to 2020 voters.
"I am glad that the Mueller Report has been made public. It's important to the American people. My focus is on beating Donald Trump at the ballot box and solving the problems that got him elected in the first place," Yang said.
I am glad that the Mueller Report has been made public. It’s important to the American people. My focus is on beating Donald Trump at the ballot box and solving the problems that got him elected in the first place.— Andrew Yang (@AndrewYang) April 18, 2019
Former Sen. Mike Gravel (Alaska), who is running with the intention of introducing issues on the debate stage, explicitly said on April 18 that he was not interested in responding to Mueller’s report.
“we won't be doing tweets about the mueller report because it's pointless,” his account tweeted.
we won't be doing tweets about the mueller report because it's pointless— Mike Gravel (@MikeGravel) April 18, 2019
Former Rep. John DelaneyJohn DelaneyDirect air capture is a crucial bipartisan climate policy Lobbying world Coronavirus Report: The Hill's Steve Clemons interviews Rep. Rodney Davis MORE (D-Md.) released a statement April 18 suggesting that responding through the ballot box is the appropriate response to the Mueller report.
“The one conclusion that every American should reach from the Mueller report is that we are better than this,” he tweeted. “We deserve a President free on conflicts, conducting themselves with honor and integrity, and possessing a moral compass that guides their actions. We have to win in 2020.”
The one conclusion that every American should reach from the Mueller report is that we are better than this. We deserve a President free on conflicts, conducting themselves with honor and integrity, and possessing a moral compass that guides their actions. We have to win in 2020.— John Delaney (@JohnDelaney) April 18, 2019
Montana Gov. Steve BullockSteve Bullock65 former governors, mayors back bipartisan infrastructure deal Arkansas, New Jersey governors to head National Governors Association Biden 'allies' painting him into a corner MORE released a statement on May 29 following Mueller’s press conference backing oversight, but not impeachment.
"Congress should fulfill its constitutionally empowered oversight of this Administration, and the President and his staff have an obligation to be responsive to those investigations," Bullock said. "As a former Attorney General, I know that no individual is above the law."
– Updated June 14 at 11:06 a.m.