2020 Dems slam Trump over census citizenship question

2020 Dems slam Trump over census citizenship question
© iStock

A slate of 2020 Democratic presidential candidates hammered President TrumpDonald John TrumpHarris bashes Kavanaugh's 'sham' nomination process, calls for his impeachment after sexual misconduct allegation Celebrating 'Hispanic Heritage Month' in the Age of Trump Let's not play Charlie Brown to Iran's Lucy MORE Friday for his administration’s efforts to add a citizenship question to the census. 

Speaking at the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO) Presidential Campaign Forum hosted by Telemundo, the candidates panned the question as an effort to undercount immigrant communities and possibly reduce their resources and representation in Congress.

ADVERTISEMENT

The census will help determine the number of congressional seats and electoral votes each state gets, making it critical to how votes will be counted in the decade after it is taken.

The prospect of a citizenship question’s addition is making its way through the courts. 

“Well, I think for a start, even before we worry about what I do after I'm president, we should talk about what might be able to be done in the next several months. And that is, the Congress has the ability to pass language which says, ‘We will not fund something unless something is eliminated.’ And I've done that over the years,” Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersGun control: Campaigning vs. legislating Booker defends middle-ground health care approach: 'We're going to fight to get there' Sunday shows preview: Democratic candidates make the rounds after debate MORE (I-Vt.) said. 

“And I think it was a damn good idea to say that we're not gonna fund money for the census unless that absolutely bigoted language is taken out of the census. So I think we might wanna jump in before.” 

The candidates suggested an array of actions, from scrapping the question in their administrations to taking action now in Congress to allowing the Supreme Court to reach a verdict.

But all agreed that there were partisan interests at play in the question.

“I would immediately, as president, in my first 100 days get rid of that citizenship question, if it is still on there. That's the number one. Number two, we will have to have a recount, if the Supreme Court persists in including this question on there,” Sen. Amy KlobucharAmy Jean KlobucharSunday shows - Guns dominate after Democratic debate Klobuchar: Investigation into Kavanaugh 'a sham' Sunday shows preview: Democratic candidates make the rounds after debate MORE (D-Minn.) said. 

“Let's let the Supreme Court make a decision. But do understand this: If the Supreme Court decides to go forward and let that question be added and it's — and we know it will suppress the response, I've been thinking hard about this. And I will have a plan to deal with it. But this is really important,” Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Ann WarrenGun control: Campaigning vs. legislating Booker defends middle-ground health care approach: 'We're going to fight to get there' Democrats spar over electoral appeal of 'Medicare for All' MORE (D-Mass.) said.

“If we don't properly count the people living in our community, then the people living in our community will be shortchanged in a thousand ways that rely on the census. And so, this is vitally important for communities like ours. Plus, we know from evidence in some of these court proceedings that this manipulation of the census has been motivated racially and politically. It is wrong. And we must resist that,” South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete ButtigiegPeter (Pete) Paul ButtigiegO'Rourke responds to Buttigieg's gun criticism: 'That calculation and fear is what got us here in the first place' Buttigieg: Biden gave 'bad' debate answer on slavery's legacy O'Rourke's debate moment reignites gun debate on Sunday shows MORE said. 

He added, “There are certainly measures, on a forward-looking basis, that the next president can undertake, beginning with enshrining, in law, the principle that you cannot manipulate the census for political advantage and that you would never introduce a question that is likely to distort or diminish the accuracy of the census.”

“We'll recount it if we have to. We'll count it until we get it right. Every person will be counted in America if I'm president,” Rep. Eric SwalwellEric Michael SwalwellYoung insurgents aren't rushing to Kennedy's side in Markey fight The Hill's Campaign Report: Democrats clash over future of party in heated debate 5 takeaways from fiery Democratic debate MORE (D-Calif.) vowed. “The new American majority is going to be a Latino majority. The president knows this and he's trying to hold us back. But we're not powerless. So in the Congress right now, we're not gonna fund discriminatory census practices.”

“My hope is that we're gonna get a decision soon from the Supreme Court that is positive and that this question will not go on the census. If it does, then — and I'm elected president, I will do everything that I can to make sure that we do an accurate count,” former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro said. 

He continued, “This is important because it's estimated that up to 4 million people could be undercounted if this question goes on the census. And a lot of those are gonna be Latinos. And you know what the game is. The game, even if this never happens, is to scare people into not participating. I will remedy that if I'm president.”

“Well, I think that this entire process of trying to put on, you know, questions like the citizenship question, which is clearly designed to get certain parts of our population not to come forward and be counted in the census, is corrupt and illegal,” former Democratic Gov. John HickenlooperJohn HickenlooperLeft off debate stage, Bullock all-in on Iowa Yang says he would not run as a third-party candidate The Hill's Morning Report - Hurricane Dorian devastates the Bahamas, creeps along Florida coast MORE (Colo.) said. “If it goes forward, I would use every congressional method to make sure that the count is reverified.” 

“In my administration, there will be no citizenship question on the census. We will make sure that, if there has been an undercount in 2020, that we get back out there and count every single American whose voice and whose story needs to be part of the national conversation,” former Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas) said. “It’s intended to suppress the vote of Latinos, of people of color, those whose country of national origin was some other place, who came here to contribute to our greatness. Let's make sure that they can by counting every single one of them.”

Advocacy groups challenging the citizenship question in court said last week that documents found in the files of a Republican strategist show he was in communication with a top official involved with the census, saying the talks are evidence that there are partisan motivations behind the possible census change.

Strategist Thomas Hofeller was revealed last month to have allegedly conducted a study in 2015 that found that asking about citizenship would help Republicans and white communities while hurting Democrats and Latino communities. 

The Justice Department has denied in court that Hofeller played a role in getting a citizenship question on the 2020 census.