Intraparty rift bursts through in latest Democratic debate

Intraparty rift bursts through in latest Democratic debate
© UPI Photo

DETROIT – The long-simmering tensions between the Democratic presidential field’s progressive standard-bearers and moderate hopefuls burst out into the open during the second primary debate on Tuesday night, as candidates from both flanks challenged one another on issues central to the race.

From the outset, a confrontation between the competing factions appeared imminent. John DelaneyJohn Kevin DelaneyDelaney to take message to Iowa voters on Sunday with infomercial Bloomberg run should push Warren to the center — but won't The Hill's 12:30 Report: Impeachment fight enters new stage MORE, a former Maryland congressman who is among the primary field’s lower-tier candidates, delivered a direct rebuke of the contest’s leading progressives, Sen. Bernie SandersBernie Sanders2020 Democrats make play for veterans' votes 2020 Dems put focus on stemming veteran suicides The Memo: Democrats confront prospect of long primary MORE (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Ann WarrenWarren goes local in race to build 2020 movement 2020 Democrats make play for veterans' votes 2020 Dems put focus on stemming veteran suicides MORE (D-Mass.), in his opening remarks, warning that the two would lead the Democratic Party down a poorly charted path.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We can’t go down the road that Sen. Sanders and Sen. Warren want to take us, which is with bad policy like 'Medicare for All,'” Delaney said. 

That touched off a series of similar comments from the primary field’s centrist candidates. Former Colorado Gov. John HickenlooperJohn HickenlooperKrystal Ball dismisses Rahm Emanuel's 'Medicare for All' criticism as a 'corporatist mantra' Trump says remark about Colorado border wall was made 'kiddingly' Colorado governor mocks Trump for saying he's building wall there MORE insisted that he was a progressive, but was “a little more pragmatic” than those in the contest’s liberal lane.

Instead of clashing as some political observers had predicted, Warren and Sanders banded together in a sort-of unified front, defending many of the liberal positions that have defined their respective presidential campaigns, as well as the overarching notion that transformational proposals will be the most powerful tool in Democrats’ efforts to defeat President TrumpDonald John TrumpGOP senators balk at lengthy impeachment trial Warren goes local in race to build 2020 movement 2020 Democrats make play for veterans' votes MORE.

"I don't understand why anybody goes to all the trouble of running for president of the United States just to talk about what we really can't do and shouldn't fight for," Warren quipped after Delaney referenced the “fairy tale” proposals put forth by progressives. 

The debate was the clearest display to date of the choice Democrats face in selecting their next presidential nominee. 

The party’s ascendant progressive wing has pointed to establishment-minded Democrats’ failure to woo voters with substantial and sweeping policy proposals as part of the reason for former Secretary of State Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham Clinton2020 Democrats make play for veterans' votes The Memo: Democrats confront prospect of long primary Manafort sought to hurt Clinton 2016 campaign efforts in key states: NYT MORE’s defeat in 2016. By contrast, they argue, disaffected voters cast their ballots for Trump because of his apparent willingness to blow up political norms.

More moderate Democrats, however, hold that voters are more eager to return to regular order in Washington and elect politicians willing to work across the aisle to bring about incremental change. That faction has so far been helmed in the presidential field by former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenGOP senators balk at lengthy impeachment trial 2020 Democrats make play for veterans' votes 2020 Dems put focus on stemming veteran suicides MORE, the current front-runner in the race.

Montana Gov. Steve BullockSteve BullockBiden, Buttigieg condemn rocket attacks on Israel Press: Another billionaire need not apply Obama's former chief economist advising Buttigieg MORE, a centrist who was on the debate stage for the first time on Tuesday, was quick to mention that he was the only candidate in the race who had won a statewide election in a state that Trump won by 20 points in 2016. 

It was that record, he argued, that would propel him to victory in 2020. 

“I’m a pro-choice, pro-union populist Democrat that won three elections in a red state, not by compromising our values but by getting stuff done,” Bullock said.

Sen. Amy KlobucharAmy Jean KlobucharHillicon Valley: Federal inquiry opened into Google health data deal | Facebook reports millions of post takedowns | Microsoft shakes up privacy debate | Disney plus tops 10M sign-ups in first day Federal inquiry opened into Google health data deal Google sparks new privacy fears over health care data MORE (D-Minn.) said as much, casting herself as capable of appealing to voters in crucial Midwestern states with her embrace of bipartisanship.

And another moderate, Rep. Tim RyanTimothy (Tim) RyanTim Ryan endorses Biden for president Strategists say Warren 'Medicare for All' plan could appeal to centrists Trump mocks O'Rourke after Democrat drops out of race MORE (D-Ohio), ignited a heated exchange with Sanders on the issue of health care, arguing that the Vermont senator’s proposed single-payer system would rip high-quality insurance away from the very union workers that Sanders has courted aggressively in his presidential bid.

“This plan that's being offered by Sen. Warren and Sen. Sanders will tell those union members who gave away wages in order to get good health care that they're going to lose their health care because Washington's going to come in and tell them they got a better plan,” Ryan said.

When Sanders said that Medicare for All would offer more comprehensive health care than private, employer-based insurance, Ryan insisted that the senator did not, in fact, know that to be the case.

“I do know it,” Sanders sniped in response. “I wrote the damn bill.”

While the divisions among Democrats were put on display on Tuesday, Warren and Sanders were remarkably united. 

The two occupy similar lanes in the primary field, and most recent polls show the two vying neck and neck for second place behind Biden. That competition prompted speculation ahead of the debate that the progressive senators may be on a crash course towards a confrontation. 

By the end of the night, however, that anticipated clash never materialized.

Some candidates warned that, in adopting far-left positions on everything from health care to immigration to gun control, progressives risked being branded socialists by Republicans, who have already seized on that label as part of their election strategy for 2020. 

At one point, South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete ButtigiegPeter (Pete) Paul Buttigieg2020 Democrats make play for veterans' votes 2020 Dems put focus on stemming veteran suicides The Memo: Democrats confront prospect of long primary MORE pushed back against that critique. Democrats, he said, should “stop worrying what the Republicans will say.”

"Let's just stand up for the right policy and go out there and defend it," Buttigieg said.

Ten other Democratic presidential candidates are slated to take the stage on Wednesday night, including Biden and Sen. Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisWarren goes local in race to build 2020 movement 2020 Dems put focus on stemming veteran suicides The Memo: Democrats confront prospect of long primary MORE (D-Calif.), who’s fierce exchange over school busing in the first debate last month has raised speculation of another confrontation