Republicans in and out of Congress are urging GOP leaders to move quickly on immigration reform in response to President Obama’s executive actions.
The GOP voices say Republican lawmakers should take the reins of the immigration debate with new legislation, both to bolster their party ahead of the 2016 elections and to push back against Obama.
“The best way to criticize governing through fiat is to offer an alternative,” said Republican activist Grover Norquist.
“What appears to be the smart move, and what they’re going to do, is do immigration reform through normal legislative [channels],” said Norquist, the president of Americans for Tax Reform. “Do it in a way that Republicans find acceptable, meaning take the border seriously [and] think of America’s economic needs. Move forward on that and let him [Obama] be over in the corner stamping his feet.”
Speaker John BoehnerJohn Andrew BoehnerLobbying world A new kind of hero? Last week's emotional TV may be a sign GOP up in arms over Cheney, Kinzinger MORE (R-Ohio) has tried previously to move immigration reform, but opposition from his conservative wing cut those efforts short.
Incoming Senator Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellOn The Money — Democrats rush to finish off infrastructure Biden employs flurry of meetings to unite warring factions GOP senators say Biden COVID-19 strategy has 'exacerbated vaccine hesitancy' MORE (R-Ky.) backed then-President George W. Bush’s push for reform in 2006, voting in favor of a comprehensive bill that year. The bill never became law, however, and McConnell voted against a similar measure the following year.
When 68 senators, including 14 Republicans, voted in favor of reform last year, McConnell was one of 32 “nays.”
Both BoehnerJohn Andrew BoehnerLobbying world A new kind of hero? Last week's emotional TV may be a sign GOP up in arms over Cheney, Kinzinger MORE and McConnell are now under pressure to wage the immigration battle by denying funding for the agencies overseeing Obama’s executive actions, which will shelter as many as 5 million illegal immigrants from deportation and offer them the chance to work in the country legally. Conservatives are also pressing their leaders to expand the GOP’s lawsuit against the White House on ObamaCare to include immigration policy.
But a number of Republicans see both of those strategies as losers.
Alfonso Aguilar, who headed the Office of Citizenship under President George W. Bush, said there’s “no way” the defunding route would work because the key agency — the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) — operates on a fee basis, in lieu of congressional appropriations. The same concern has been raised by House Appropriations Committee Chairman Hal Rogers (R-Ky.).
As for the lawsuit tactic, Aguilar, now head of the American Principles in Action's Latino Partnership, argued simply that that approach would fail.
“The case law is not on the Republican side,” he said.
Republicans calling for legislation say there is plenty of low-hanging fruit to pick, and that doing so would help the party in 2016, when it hopes to retake the White House and keep the Senate while defending a hefty 24 seats.
Doing nothing risks alienating Hispanics and other immigrant voters ahead of those high-stakes elections.
“We have an obligation to do something — the ball is in our court — and in spite of whatever political considerations there may be on this, the public is ultimately going to judge us on whether we’ve found a solution to this problem or not,” said Al Cardenas, former head of the American Conservative Union, who’s now pushing Republicans in Congress for reforms.
Still, there are significant obstacles, including conservative lawmakers, activists and talk-show hosts who are wary of efforts to provide legalization and citizenship for illegal immigrants, which the critics consider “amnesty.”
They are sure to push 2016 Republican presidential front-runners to move hard right on immigration.
With that in mind, GOP immigration reformers are calling for more focused reforms, rather than one big package.
Proposals to expand visas for high-tech workers, streamline a guest-worker program for the nation’s farms, establish a mandatory E-verify system for businesses and create an exit-visa registry to rein in overstays could all pass both chambers with bipartisan support, the GOP reform advocates said.
“It’s a losing issue for the Democrats if the Republicans just take this step-by-step,” Norquist said.
Obama and the Democrats have largely opposed that piecemeal approach for fear that passing the more popular elements of immigration reform would make it all but impossible to move more contentious provisions, particularly the creation of a pathway to citizenship.
But influential Republicans say the president would be hard-pressed to veto legislation that hit his desk with Democrats on board.
“Republicans can pass these in the House and Senate and the president’s going to have to veto or sign it — put up or shut up,” Norquist said. “He can’t play this game, ‘How come you guys won’t do X?’ We just did X, buster.”
Some GOP committee heads are already making moves to address the issue.
Rep. Mike McCaul (Texas), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, is crafting legislation to bolster border enforcement.
McCaul’s proposal is in its early stages, but his office said it will be “stronger” than the bipartisan bill he passed through the committee with unanimous support last year.
Rep. Bob GoodlatteRobert (Bob) William GoodlatteThe job of shielding journalists is not finished Bottom line No documents? Hoping for legalization? Be wary of Joe Biden MORE (Va.), head of the House Judiciary Committee, is another Republican with immigration on his radar. On Tuesday, the Virginia Republican is staging a hearing to examine Obama’s “overreach” on deportation policy.
Sen. Chuck GrassleyChuck GrassleyBiden confronts sinking poll numbers Congress needs to push for more accountability in gymnasts' tragic sex abuse Franken targets senators from both parties in new comedy tour MORE (R-Iowa), the incoming chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Republicans are considering “a number of things” on immigration, including proposals “to nullify” Obama’s recent executive action. But Grassley also warned that “any legislation beyond that faces new hurdles largely because President Obama missed a big opportunity to work with a new Congress.”
McConnell and Boehner have vowed action in the wake of Obama’s move, but neither has given any indication what they plan to do, or when.
Boehner tried to move immigration legislation this year, floating a series of reform “principles” designed to guide the discussion. But a revolt from conservative lawmakers angry over a legalization provision forced him to shelve the plan almost immediately.
With that episode in mind, some Republican immigration reformers are looking for the Senate to take the lead on the issue next year. Aguilar described Boehner’s record on the issue as “pathetic.”
“He has a hard time dealing with his conservative members. He doesn’t talk to them,” Aguilar said. “I just don’t see him leading.”
McConnell, for his part, will be newly empowered to lead the Senate, but his primary goal is to retain the upper chamber in 2016. And moving anything on immigration would be risky.
Additionally, three conservative members — Sens. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulGOP political operatives indicted over illegal campaign contribution from Russian national in 2016 White House debates vaccines for air travel Senate lawmakers let frustration show with Blinken MORE (Ky.), Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzMatthew McConaughey on potential political run: 'I'm measuring it' Professor tells Cruz that Texas's voter ID law is racist Schumer moves to break GOP blockade on Biden's State picks MORE (Texas) and Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioDemocrats face bleak outlook in Florida The Hill's 12:30 Report - Presented by Facebook - Dems attempt to tie government funding, Ida relief to debt limit Poll: Trump dominates 2024 Republican primary field MORE (Fla.) — are mulling potential runs at the White House, which could complicate matters for McConnell.
With those dynamics in mind, Aguilar said success will hinge on the efforts of rank-and-file conservatives. He cited lawmakers such as Paul, Sen. Mike LeeMichael (Mike) Shumway LeeThe Hill's 12:30 Report - Presented by Facebook - Dems attempt to tie government funding, Ida relief to debt limit Trump lawyer offered six-point plan for Pence to overturn election: book Graham found Trump election fraud arguments suitable for 'third grade': Woodward book MORE (R-Utah) and Rep. Raúl Labrador (R-Idaho), who have expressed an interest in reforms and can sway fellow conservatives to back them. Support from traditional reform champions such as Sens. John McCainJohn Sidney McCainCollins to endorse LePage in Maine governor comeback bid Meghan McCain: Country has not 'healed' from Trump under Biden Biden steps onto global stage with high-stakes UN speech MORE (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamThe Hill's 12:30 Report - Presented by Facebook - Biden meets with lawmakers amid domestic agenda panic The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Alibaba - House Democrats plagued by Biden agenda troubles Graham tries to help Trump and McConnell bury the hatchet MORE (R-S.C.), he added, simply won’t be enough.
“This cannot be just led by moderates or by leadership,” Aguilar said. “You’re going to need conservative players who have good conservative credentials, in line with the Tea Party, to push this.”
Democrats, meanwhile, are also hoping the Republicans’ anger over Obama’s order translates into action.
Rep. Nydia Velázquez (N.Y.), the top Democrat on the House Small Business Committee, said Obama’s move “will bring the Republicans to act.” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said she’s hoping “there will be a rethinking … by the Republicans … that we should have comprehensive immigration reform.” And Obama is practically begging GOP leaders to pass reforms that will make his executive steps dispensable.
“The day I sign that bill into law,” Obama said in announcing the new policies, “the actions I take will no longer be necessary.”