Rep. Mo BrooksMorris (Mo) Jackson BrooksJudge questions Trump's claim of 'absolute immunity' in Jan. 6 lawsuits Alabama GOP gears up for fierce Senate primary clash Democratic super PAC ties Trump allies to Jan. 6 in new ad campaign MORE (R-Ala.) said he would not support Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellDemocrats make voting rights push ahead of Senate consideration Hogan won't say if he will file to run for Senate by Feb. 22 deadline Voting rights, Trump's Big Lie, and Republicans' problem with minorities MORE (R-Ky.) if he’s elected to the Senate.
In an interview with reporters Wednesday on immigration, Brooks took the opportunity to rail against McConnell's leadership and Sen. Luther Strange (R-Ala.), whom he is hoping to unseat in the Republican primary for former Sen. Jeff SessionsJefferson (Jeff) Beauregard SessionsPress: For Trump endorsement: The more sordid, the better Those predicting Facebook's demise are blowing smoke If bitcoin is 'digital gold,' it should be taxed like gold MORE’s spot in the chamber.
"Inside the Republican Conference, Mitch McConnell has got to go," Brooks said. "He is the head of the swamp in the U.S. Senate."
Brooks's distaste for McConnell likely stems from the fact that the majority leader has thrown his weight behind Strange, who was appointed to fill the seat vacated by the attorney general in the months before the special election.
McConnell has told groups such as the National Republican Senatorial Committee to treat Strange as the incumbent, a designation that gives him a major leg up on fundraising and organizational muscle, considering the NRSC has a policy to blacklist vendors that work with candidates challenging their incumbents.
The Senate Leadership Fund, the de facto super PAC of GOP Senate leadership, has already hammered Brooks with a $2.5 million ad campaign that brings up Brooks's criticisms of Trump during the 2016 GOP presidential primary. The group has budgeted up to $10 million for the race. And the NRSC has the green light to spend $350,000 on Strange's behalf.
Brooks has decried that push, seeking to frame the investments as Washington interests meddling in Alabama's elections. He's long blasted the SLF as "swamp critters" in hopes of echoing Trump's "drain the swamp" mantra.
"This primary, to sum it up succinctly, everybody in this room is familiar with Donald Trump, candidate, pledging that as President TrumpDonald TrumpWendy Sherman takes leading role as Biden's 'hard-nosed' Russia negotiator Senate needs to confirm Deborah Lipstadt as antisemitism envoy — Now Former acting Defense secretary under Trump met with Jan. 6 committee: report MORE he would try to drain the Washington swamp.
"In this Senate race, the swamp is fighting back, and the swamp’s candidate is Luther Strange," Brooks said.
He added that Strange was certain to support McConnell if reelected, as well as the Senate's 60-vote filibuster rule.
"This is a major battle. If the American people want to continue with the kind of frustration … we’ve seen over the last six months where the Republicans have the House and Senate and the White House and can’t address these major issues, the reason for it is the 60 percent rule in the Senate. That is a major definitional point between my campaign and Luther Strange’s," he said.
Brooks also questioned Trump's allegiance to his own campaign promises, zeroing in on the president's recent attacks on Sessions.
"It reminds me of the kinds of public statements we saw before [former FBI Director James] Comey was terminated," Brooks said.
"The respect for Jeff Sessions is so great that I’m sure if President Trump were to fire or embarrass Jeff Sessions into quitting, that a lot of President Trump voters, particularly in the primary, will have mixed feelings about what is going on," he added.
Earlier this week, Brooks released a controversial ad that uses audio from the June shooting that injured House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.).
Some in Scalise’s camp slammed the ad as an attempt to use the shooting for political gain, further widening the rift between Brooks and GOP leadership.