Nunes: Dem memo doesn't change anything, proves intel abuse occurred

Nunes: Dem memo doesn't change anything, proves intel abuse occurred
© Getty Images

Rep. Devin NunesDevin Gerald NunesLIVE COVERAGE: Ways and Means begins Day 2 on .5T package Biden faces unfinished mission of evacuating Americans Nunes sues MSNBC, alleging Rachel Maddow defamed him MORE (R-Calif.) said on Saturday that a Democratic rebuttal to a GOP memo released earlier this month alleging abuses by the FBI and Justice Department will not affect the substance of the document.

"What you’re not going to see is anything that actually rejects what was actually in our memo," Nunes, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said at the Conservative Political Action Conference.

The first memo, released by Republicans on the Intelligence Committee, accused FBI and Justice Department officials of abusing their authority to obtain a surveillance warrant against a former Trump campaign adviser. 

ADVERTISEMENT

But Democrats on the panel raised concerns about the GOP document, which they said omitted key facts that would help put the memo's contents into the proper context.

Committee Democrats sought to release their own memo rebutting the GOP document, but the White House initially denied that request, citing concerns from the FBI and Justice Department that it would reveal classified information. 

A redacted version of that memo was released Saturday. 

Nunes said that Republicans on the Intelligence Committee wanted the Democratic memo to be released because it would provide evidence that Democrats were working with the FBI and Justice Department to undermine President TrumpDonald TrumpKinzinger says Trump 'winning' because so many Republicans 'have remained silent' Our remote warfare counterterrorism strategy is more risk than reward Far-right rally draws small crowd, large police presence at Capitol MORE and his campaign.

"What you basically will read in the Democratic memo is they are advocating that it is okay for the FBI and [Justice Department] to use political dirt paid for by one campaign and use it against the other campaign," he said.